Exactly.
Printable View
Yes. Only low IQ retards with 0 self awareness, such as yourself, would think otherwise.
Do you think that low IQ is a good thing?
This is a massively retarded question that doesn't deserve an answer, but I'll answer anyway. If it's something genetic, then no, that's not their fault. That still doesn't mean being low IQ is a good thing.Quote:
Do you think that a person who you think has low IQ is themselves at fault for having low IQ?
That said, in most cases, it's really just lazy and/or ignorant people who are willfully choosing to remain that way, who probably aren't "real" low IQ, they're just stupid by choice.
You are a perfect example of this. Or maybe you really are just a legit low IQ via genetics, but you have at least enough brain power to understand a clusterfuck like Gemstone, so that has to be good for something.
These are all retarded questions, but I'll bite anyway because I'm bored...punished as in how? Be specific as to what sort of "punishment" you're referring to.Quote:
Do you think that a person that you think has low IQ should be punished for it?
Is a low IQ not being hired for a job they're literally too stupid to handle it a form of "punishment" to you, for example? Don't confuse that with someone just not being educated in XYZ field. There's a big diference.
Brain dead low IQs who can't think for themselves, like you, shouldn't have an equal vote as people who don't live with their heads up their asses and don't just blindly believe everything their TV tells them to.
But they do, and that's not going to change, which is why everything is getting progressively more and more retarded, to the point that defining what is a "man" and a "woman" is a mainstream debate now. Even though it's a 90/10 issue, it was a 100/0 issue for centuries until recently, with the 10 consisting of retards. That's because of retards like you, regardless of whether it's due to legit low IQ, or just being a lazy and gullible dumbass.
There are retarded low IQ people like this on both the left and right, before you get all upset and start crying. There are just a lot more on the left these days.
if you think I'm wrong, then tell me which side can't define what a woman is.
Hint: It's not the right.
TLDR: Low IQ people shouldn't be catered to at the expense of normal people.
And since you're going to ignore it from the beginning of my post, I'll ask again here: Do you think that low IQ is a good thing?
People that are born with mental handicaps or suffered a traumatic brain injury, no it’s not a bad thing & I don’t believe they should be ridiculed.
People who are retarded by choice (IE the willfully ignorant): Yes it’s bad, yes it’s ultimately their fault, and yes they should be punished & ridiculed for being a dumbass.
Actually I concede Methais makes a good point. Low IQ is a bad thing and we don’t want a big population of low IQ. I can’t blame someone that genuinely has down syndrome or is actually mentally retarded/handicapped/whatever is the medical term, but it’s not a good thing.
People that choose to be retarded, and yes for most stupid people I believe that is a choice, deserve to be mocked and ridiculed.
Sadly, long term pot use has been linked to losing as much as 10 IQ points over a decade. With the rise of pot use significantly correlated with the rise in Leftism in the US (my assertion but the timeline sure seems to click) perhaps it's more than an a coincidence.
Here is one such paper on the pot use so the morons can't cry about me making stuff up.
https://neurosciencenews.com/cannabis-cognition-19945
I was a habitual pot smoker until just a few years ago. Usually I’d smoke 1 bowl in the evenings on work nights and maybe a little more than that on weekend. I consider that light but you be the judge. I decided to quit a few years ago mainly because the buddy I got it from moved across the state, and it just wasn’t doing anything for me anymore.
I hate pot culture. It’s definitely associated with the left. I don’t think smoking it causes people to lean left, but the whole culture originating from 60s hippies and such is there & owned by the left.
Not scientific but I do believe me smoking for 20+ years did longterm damage to my short term memory. It’s not terrible, but not what it used to be. Could just be me getting older.
I think in general marijuana is a lot less damaging than alcohol or most other drugs, but certainly not good for you.
The problem I have with pot is 2 fold. First, we know exactly how bad alcohol is since we have real research. We are just beginning to learn about pot. Also, pot, like tobacco can be messed with, alcohol is alcohol. Second issue, no one gets drunk or experiences alcohol use side effects from alcohol sitting in a container on a table. When you smoke, it's not contained, you, whoever is near you, kids, dogs, whatever, all get it. That's my issues.
I blaze every day after work. I could blaze at work too, but then that just makes me not want to deal with work, but I can still handle it just fine if I had to.
Pot culture is retarded though, I agree, and there's no lack of right leaning people who are potheads. The most likely difference is leftist potheads are probably statistically more fitting of the pothead stereotype, but even if they weren't potheads, they'd still be chronically broke and unemployed losers. Smoking weed didn't make them that way, but I will concede that a lot of "the right," though less than even 10-20 years ago, need to get the fuck over it. Hardcore anti-weed conservatives are their own stereotype, and if anything would "push" people to the left regarding weed, it would be those types who are hardcore anti-weed.
Yes.Quote:
I think in general marijuana is a lot less damaging than alcohol or most other drugs...
I'll go so far as to say that at least most of the "not good for you" things about it are from the actual smoking part, because smoking anything isn't good for anyone.Quote:
but certainly not good for you.