So rather than try to understand how your statement seemed ignorant with the words you used not to mention the factual evidence proving it bizarrely incorrect you decide to irrationally bash a faceless group of people in an attempt to justify it?
Printable View
Exactly like I was thinking. It made zero sense.
Your lack of tears makes me sad. Why can't you post like Briarfox? That guy knows how to turn on the waterworks!Quote:
The biggest take away and only real mandate in this election, (which I said before), is that Americans are tired of business as usual in Washington and want change. They want results. It's easy to forget that the Dems were only 3% points from having an outsider candidate as well. It will be interesting to see what the response is. The real difficulty is that a lot of people who want change aren't really sure what they want, they just know what they don't want, while an even bigger issue is that the ideals are piling up to the far right and the far left, with little viable middle ground. Guess we'll all see what happens.
Wait..
so in your head, if Johnson wasn't on the ballot, the people who voted for him would have stayed home.. but if Stein wasn't on the ballet, those people would have ALL voted for Clinton?
You should run your logic by an adult before posting.. you might look less retarded.
It's how they rationalize that Nader cost Gore the election with a whole 2% of the vote, but Perot didn't cost Bush the election even though Perot got something like 20% of the vote.
In usual Democrat fashion they look for ANY excuse to say why their candidate lost, other than, you know, their candidate just being the worse candidate.
Kind of like they will scream at the top of their lungs that we don't need voter ID laws because our elections are all open and fair and there isn't a need for voter ID laws but then they will turn around and insist the only reason the Republicans have maintained a majority in the House for so long is because Republicans have cheated via gerrymandering.