I don't think you're seeing the difference here.
Forcing a baker to write something = removing the baker's freedom of speech
Removing free speech Twitter doesn't approve of = removing said user's free speech
In both cases it is an attack on free speech, yet you somehow equate forcing a baker to do something against his will to a supposed "free speech platform" censoring speech the platform doesn't like.
https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/...67/362/f3c.gif