Oh, I don't have beef with you. I just think it's great how you beg people to pay your monthly bills to keep the lights on so you can spend 16 hours a day strawmanning liberals.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Printable View
Oh, I don't have beef with you. I just think it's great how you beg people to pay your monthly bills to keep the lights on so you can spend 16 hours a day strawmanning liberals.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Admitted pedophile Astray weighs in his worthless opinion.Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
LOLQuote:
Originally Posted by Taernath
Oh I know Dreaven isn't AFK during them. Agreed. They'd have to be turbo petty to try to get him on the botting/trigger thing, by script checking every one of his guys at once and then dinging him if any didn't meet their response time or something. It isn't in their best interest to try to mess with him that way. He has nothing to worry about unless sellstuff1 becomes a GM!Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
Rofl, he got banned from Discord. They aren't gonna let him anywhere near a position of power. Unless he steals an account but none of that information is public so... nothing he can do. Except be a triggered angry boy.Quote:
Originally Posted by audioserf
Par the course.
Sure ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by sellstuff1
He doesn't have a beef with me either!Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
This is just how he is apparently.Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
How many six year olds did you fuck today to make up for how shit you are dark souls, loser?Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
He doesn't actually need to be AFK to be in violation of policy 18. The mere fact that you can tap any number of his characters to receive service is in violation of the policy, that's the thing. The way that policy is written, witnessing a pattern of a character providing a service in response to a verb is all that is needed for him to be in violation.Quote:
Originally Posted by audioserf
So report him. As said, the GMs know damn well what he does.Quote:
Originally Posted by sellstuff1
Agreed, it is by far the biggest dick move. But not very surprising.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
He still posts from time to time. No need to bring up old shit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
Ah, alright. Got it.Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCranium
http://forum.gsplayers.com/member.php?30-ParkbanditQuote:
Originally Posted by sellstuff1
Also: You sure do have some sort of obsession with homosexuality, pedophilia and racism. Sounds like you might be projecting your desires upon others here. I'd say seek some mental help.. but let's be honest: there's not much there to help.
Obviously right leaning news.Quote:
Originally Posted by sellstuff1
Unlike you, I'm able to see obvious bias.
I thought you said you quit? Why are you STILL grinding on about it? A GM laughed at you and it hurt your fee fees?Quote:
Originally Posted by sellstuff1
I thought it was a penis shaped pond??Quote:
Originally Posted by Taernath
130 Republicans in the House joined Democrats to oppose Trump lifting sanctions on Derapaska. I doubt it will happen but hopefully the R's in the Senate will see this has broad bi-partisan support and revisit it.
And the Belarus model that was imprisoned in Thailand, the one that said she had proof of Russia helping Trump win in the 2016 election, was immediately detained at the Moscow airport after being deported there by Thai authorities. Can't say I didn't see that coming a hundred miles away.
True, true. Thread tags updated.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Hey! Stupid is back!Quote:
Originally Posted by time4fun
New job? New PhD? MORE MONEY?
Tell us Time4fun!!!! Were all just dying to fulfill your narcissism!!!
That series is ghey. Stop being so ghey.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
I laughed, I laughed some more.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fortybox
President Donald Trump directed his longtime attorney Michael Cohen to lie to Congress about negotiations to build a Trump Tower in Moscow, according to two federal law enforcement officials involved in an investigation of the matter.
Trump also supported a plan, set up by Cohen, to visit Russia during the presidential campaign, in order to personally meet President Vladimir Putin and jump-start the tower negotiations. “Make it happen,” the sources said Trump told Cohen.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/amphtml...mpression=true
Thanks for the source.
Senator Klobuchar asked Barr during his confirmation hearing if a President asking someone to commit perjury would be tantamount to obstruction of justice. Barr said yes.
https://imgur.com/a/rTHh5Q4
OMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGQuote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
More importantly, America's own Littlefinger, Lindsey Graham asked him again to confirm the point.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
OMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGQuote:
Originally Posted by peam
Imagine hating your country this much.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrathbringer
Imagine being this retarded.Quote:
Originally Posted by peam
Lindsey Graham: Thank you. I'll just take a couple seconds to see if I can help clarify this. Because I think it's been a very interesting hearing. So if there was some reason to believe that the president tried to coach somebody not to testify or testify falsely, that could be obstruction of justice.Quote:
Originally Posted by peam
William Barr: Yes.
My favorite closeted homosexual Republican senator from South Carolina.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Ah the left, the part of progressives.Quote:
Originally Posted by peam
Also apparently the party of LOL UR GAY!!!!!!!!
I wasn't laughing. I genuinely enjoy Lindsey Graham's hijinks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
fixedQuote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Seriously, what is it about gay people using gay as an insult to straight men?Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
Gotta get ahead of that Buzzfeed story this morning.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...52588088082432
Jesus, what a shit-show.
Here's where you went wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by peam
You're probably better off finding out Which Hogwarts House Do You Belong In: https://www.buzzfeed.com/guillermode...t?origin=nofil
the only shit show is pk and the tard of the hour (currently you) constantly getting off on baseless fake news trump bashing together.Quote:
Originally Posted by peam
Tell us more about those $5m per month Blizzard servers that you pulled from your favorite place, the first google result, and weren't being sarcastic about.Quote:
Originally Posted by time4fun
The two guys that wrote this piece are top tier journalists. Cormier won a pulitzer in 2016 and Leopold was a pulitzer finalist in 2018. And they confirmed what I said previously that Mueller didn't just rely on Cohen's testimony. They have testimony from other Trump Organization officials as well as emails, recordings, and documents to back it up.
There you go projecting again.Quote:
Originally Posted by sellstuff1
https://media.giphy.com/media/l4Ki2o...WhFe/giphy.gif
OMG SICK BURN GOOD LUCK RECOVERING FROM THIS ONE ASTRAY RIP!!!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Praetor
https://media.giphy.com/media/GJVpbMjfT2Ftm/giphy.gif
The desperation :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by peam
The odds of Trump not making it through the year just increased significantly
I know the internet moves fast and it's probably difficult for you to understand, but Buzzfeed the shitty meme site and Buzzfeed News are essentially two separate entities with the latter doing a lot of good work.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/don...-about-n960156
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wire..._headlines_hed
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-h...ject-buzzfeed/
https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/pol...PDI/story.html
https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-...118-story.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...=.6591c10a6adc
I'm sure all those newsorgs picked it up on a whim because they have Trump Derangement Syndrome.
Jesus, even the trashfire that is the Washington Examiner picked up the story:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...-russia-report
Even Fox News was talking about it.Quote:
Originally Posted by peam
Washington Examiner's running it too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
OMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGQuote:
Originally Posted by peam
This was said in 2017.Quote:
Originally Posted by time4fun
This was said in 2018.
This was said in 2019.
I imagine it'll be said in 2020.
I imagine it'll be said in 2021.
I imagine it'll be said in 2022.
I imagine it'll be said in 2023.
I imagine it'll be said in 2024.
If you say it in 2025, YOU WOULD FINALLY BE CORRECT!!!!
wtf is the Penis Pool Incident? Closest thing I can remember is Tabor's cock & balls pond, but that wasn't a meltdown.Quote:
Originally Posted by Taernath
NEVERMIND THEN!!!!!!!!!111Quote:
Originally Posted by Taernath
I actually ran into him on Facebook a couple years ago. He's either an actual doctor now, or is still lying about being one IIRC.
OMGOMGOMGOMGOMG! THIS IS IT THEN!!!!!!!!!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by peam
LOL. Such triggering. Hopefully President Trump does something today that will just put you into a downward spiral you won't be able to get out of.
The biggest meltdown I can remember is probably time4fun post 2016 presidential election till now, but especially right after the election when she was certain Trump himself was coming to deport her illegal alien brother she won't help get citizenship because she'd rather buy text.
You're retarded.Quote:
Originally Posted by time4fun
toobz plz come backQuote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Surely you've reported him in game for this and/or contacted feedback then, right? If not, why? And if so, what did they say?Quote:
Originally Posted by sellstuff1
Can't say I'm surprised there.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Quoted to preserve retardedness.Quote:
Originally Posted by time4fun
She'll just be like "I'll be shocked if Trump makes it to Inaguration Day for the new president!"Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
So the authors of that Buzz Feed "news" article relied on supposedly two anonymous sources who claim they have seen the evidence, yet the people who wrote the article haven't seen any actual evidence yet.
Think I'll hold off on judgement until I see the evidence. I know that makes me the crazy one in the age of Trump Derangement Syndrome.
It really doesn't make much sense why Trump would direct his lawyer to commit perjury over plans to build a tower in Moscow. Contrary to what the people with Trump Derangement Syndrome believe, there is no crime against doing business in Russia.
It was a pond, I've since corrected my original allegation.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
It was definitely a meltdown. After being exposed as an entomology student instead of an MD, living with his wife's parents instead of building two houses, and using his sick daughter to solicit donations, the dude deleted his posts and never posted again. A lot of people quoted his posts before he deleted them, though, they were an entertaining read. Really there are a lot of parallels between Tabor and a certain other Problem Child.
http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthrea...n-Hall-of-FameQuote:
Originally Posted by Wrathbringer
Apparently I made a thread like this before this thread, but I can't find it.
I did, however, find this:
https://youtu.be/9rNUTzlDYlw
Hahaha oh yeah, I forgot all about the scrubbing part. I remember the pond and sick kid and all that. I may have been confusing this one with the Tabor voter card thread. Which also contained an immeasurable amount of fail, but somewhat certain it didn't reach meltdown status.Quote:
Originally Posted by Taernath
According to pk logic, Tabor never said those things.
What the shit have you just unleashed?Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Washington (CNN) President Donald Trump was startled Tuesday as he watched television coverage of his nominee for attorney general describing a warm relationship with the special counsel Robert Mueller in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee, according to three people familiar with the matter.
While Barr said during his hearing that Trump "was interested" in hearing about the friendship, the details that emerged this week caught the President off guard, the three sources said. He bristled at Barr's description of the close relationship, complaining to aides he didn't realize how much their work overlapped or that they were so close.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/17/polit...ler/index.html
The headline for this article is brilliant. "Cozy Barr"
We should just rename this entire thread to "Anonymous sources say..."
I agree. I'm not a Trump fan by any means, but I'm withholding my judgement until there's actual evidence.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Clearly you're an alt-right Nazi then.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
And now Trump is threatening Cohen's father in law. Just one more example of witness tampering to add to that ever growing list of crimes.
http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthrea...um-Uproar-EverQuote:
Originally Posted by Methais
https://i.imgur.com/01pVKIT.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by RichardCranium
When you're as retarded as hemorrhoidpk, you have to seriously respond to your own posts because no one else is going to take them seriously enough to do that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
I give him some credit for at least not having a second account to agree with himself over though.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrathbringer
Now his credit score is 1.
There’s only been one idiot that we know who needed to do that...Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
But, in It’s defense.. he didn’t dox anyone and threaten to get them fired.
So it’s a tie.
Presidential historian Jon Meacham on Friday resurfaced the first article of impeachment brought against former President Nixon in a discussion following a bombshell report that President Trump directed his former longtime lawyer Michael Cohen to lie to Congress.
“The first article of impeachment against Nixon was just this: obstruction by directing others to lie,” Meacham tweeted early Friday morning. “This is not hysteria or hyperventilating. It’s history.”
OMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOM GOMG IT'S GOING TO START HEATING UP FOR REAL NOW GUYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111111111111 OMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGQuote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
His poll numbers are rapidly drying up. They've never once gone over 50%. He has no political capital and he's weaker than ever. At this point I'm no longer worried that he isn't going to be held accountable.
Keep living in your fantasy world.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Its called reality, come and join us.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
No, I'm living in the reality where Trump is the President of the US.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
https://www.npr.org/2019/01/17/68553...lips-with-baseQuote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
You said he has no political capital, which he definitely does.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Would love to see you prove he has capital or that he's not a Russian agent and a Benedict Arnold all rolled into one.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
Good, maybe you'll stop spamming every folder 24/7 with your Trump butthurt. Even though we know you won't, because this is your whole life.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/...03/802/918.pngQuote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Prove he is, because if he is a Russian agent he is doing a very bad fucking job. Threatening to punish countries that agree to gas deals with Russia?Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
So you can't, shocker. I never would have figured you for a fan of Benedict Arnold.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
And you can't prove he is, shocker.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
I don't know how exactly you expect someone to prove someone isn't doing something. Like... He isn't doing it. You need to prove he IS doing something.
I don't need to, the OSC and FBI are doing that for us.
You’re as deluded about this as you were about the Hillary emails. Like everything else, you aren’t good at this.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
I mean, you're asking me to prove he isn't a Russian agent... How the fuck would I even do that? Get a log of everything he has ever done? I couldn't disprove that you are a Russian Agent if that was the standard that was required. Either way, I see you are also backing out of proving he is a Russian Agent, so there we are.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Says the guy that also believed Hillary broke the law. GGQuote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Again I'll ask you straight up:Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Do you now believe Hillary was 100% innocent in the whole email server thing?
You're so sure he's innocent. You aren't even the slightest bit concerned he may be compromised.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
I don't think the FBI should have dropped the case, it wasn't up to Comey to do that. They should have presented what they found to the DOJ and let them decide to prosecute or not. With Lynch recusing herself a special counsel should have been appointed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Like I said, if he is a Russian Agent, he is the worst one ever. And no, I'm pretty sure he isn't. Further, if Mueller had found any compelling evidence that he was, I imagine he would have acted quickly to have that information brought to light, rather than letting a Russian Agent remain as the Commander in Chief of the US.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
When you have a counter intelligence case against the POTUS don't you think it should be handled carefully so they make sure they have plenty of evidence to support the case? Correct me if I'm wrong but this is uncharted territory for the CIA and FBI.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
You're uber retarded.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
If you have compelling evidence you need to act, especially given that this is a very public investigation. If it was quiet and no one knew about, sure, but it isn't. This just rings to me that there is no compelling evidence that Trump himself is in any way under the thumb of Putin. Of course, there was also a secret FBI investigation launched against Trump checking for it also, after he fired Comey. That one came up with nothing as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
If they have no evidence why did they just extend the grand jury another 6 months? If Trump is so innocent why does he keep obstructing the investigation? And why do you keep saying the FBI came up with nothing? They never said that and they never closed the case, they only handed it off to Mueller when he was appointed, which was shortly after the FBI opened their investigation.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
I said evidence against Trump. There could always be other people they are looking at.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Which they are, so it's not really a surprise that the grand jury got the extension.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
Thanks for admitting that as far as you know they have nothing and you're just prognosticating, at which you're demonstrably bad.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Of course there are other people, how many indictments do we have so far? 34 or something.. Ultimately Trump is the target and he's still refusing to sit down with Mueller. You'd think he would want to clear his name if he was truly innocent instead of dumping gas on the fire and repeating Russian propaganda.
No, I think he gets off on the publicity. He'll probably do it eventually and make everyone look retarded.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Before or after he's legally forced to?Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
I doubt he is ever legally forced to do anything.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
:lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
This is pretty much every pk argument in history in a nutshell.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
You can't prove a negative, and you're a fucking tard and a half.
That was never in question. Everyone including you knows she did.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
You were 100% she was going to be indicted, and IIRC PB said she probably wouldn't be because Hillary.
You're really bad at this. Which is nothing new.
MAYBE MUELLER IS A RUSSIAN AGENT TOO AND IS REALLY TRUMP'S ACE IN THE HOLEQuote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
THOSE GUYS TOOQuote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
Considering he still blocks people on Twitter through official communications, he's not great at complying with rulings against him.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
At this point he's either oblivious to the world around him or he's a part of it. Not sure which is better.
Yeah I'm sure giving ammunition to someone specifically trying to find reasons to indict you is a great idea.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
From a left leaning source: https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/m...ution-survival
A Law Professor Explains Why You Should Never Talk to Police
"James Duane doesn't think you should ever talk to the police. Not just, "Don't talk to the police if you're accused of a crime," or, "Don't talk to the police in an interrogation setting"—never talk to the cops, period. If you are found doing something suspicious by an officer (say, breaking into your own house because you locked yourself outside), you are legally obligated to tell the cop your name and what you're doing at that very moment.
Other than that, Duane says, you should fall back on four short words: "I want a lawyer."
In 2008, Duane, a professor at Virginia's Regent Law School, gave a lecture about the risks of talking to police that was filmed and posted to YouTube. It's since been viewed millions of times, enjoying a new viral boost after the Netflix documentary Making a Murderer spurred interest in false confessions. His argument, which he's since expanded into a new book called You Have the Right to Remain Innocent, is that even if you haven't committed a crime, it's dangerous to tell the police any information. You might make mistakes when explaining where you were at the time of a crime that the police interpret as lies; the officer talking to you could misremember what you say much later; you may be tricked into saying the wrong things by cops under no obligation to tell you the truth; and your statements to police could, in combination with faulty eyewitness accounts, shoddy "expert" testimony, and sheer bad luck, lead to you being convicted of a serious crime."
And from a right leaning source: https://www.learnliberty.org/blog/ad...-talk-to-cops/
Hillary talked to the FBI.
Pretty sure the FBI had the highest suicide by double bullets to the back of the head that year.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
RiiiiightQuote:
Originally Posted by Astray
It's a joke. Probably.
I'd be more concerned with the Russians and polonium tea parties.Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
So.. in your head.. you believe that Donald Trump is a Russian agent here to infiltrate our government?Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
You can't just be high with this.. are you smoking bath salts too?
If Trump isn't compromised by Russia, why the everliving fuck is he trying to repeal sanctions on Putin's ally?Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Oh right. You haven't thought that far ahead. If Trump does something, it's obviously for the betterment of the country, not because Russia has blackmailed the president of the united states.
The CIA and FBI think so.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
So, that is your "proof" that Donald Trump is a Russian agent?Quote:
Originally Posted by sellstuff1
Cite a source that isn't as full of shit as you are?Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Or is this what your super secret sources are telling you??
https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/...39/110/8a8.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Did they open a CI case because Hillary told them? Is that what you actually believe?Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Hey look at that, the stock market is up almost 15% since it suddenly became Trump's stock market and economy and he was going to personally destroy the entire economy because of his orange skin. It's also only 2000 points away from reaching yet another all time high.
Where all the whiners at? Suddenly the economy isn't too important to talk about when it's doing well, but when there is a slight, minor, very temporary lull in the economy suddenly it's Trump's fault and it's all we can talk about 24/7. Weird how that works.
Oh by the way these are all facts sourced from actual people who aren't afraid to put their names behind the information, these are not anonymous sources. See how that works too?
So, no source to cite that says "The CIA and FBI believe that Donald Trump is a Russian Agent".Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Didn't see this coming.
At all......
It's like androidpk read the articles where they stated the CIA investigated whether he was an agent and jumped to the conclusion that snow investigation means he is?
Wtf man.
Ahhh, so they DID open a CI investigation only because Hillary told them to. Glad you could clear that up for us, buddy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Trying to decipher what happens in Androidpk's head is impossible.. unless you are high as fuck and living on someone's couch.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
You made the claim that the CIA and FBI believe that Donald Trump is a Russian agent. I'm merely asking you to provide a cite source.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
But as usual.. you can't because it's just in your head.
SPOILER: You do realize that people get investigated for things that turn out to be false.. right?
I'm not a lawyer, can someone tell me if suborning perjury counts as high crimes and misdemeanors that the Constitution talks about in regards to impeaching POTUS?
So you still can't admit they opened a CI investigation against Trump because they were concerned he may be acting on Putin's behalf. Shocker. You're going to stick to the ridiculous story that it's all a vast left wing conspiracy :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Androidpk is already talking about impeachment based on a news article which is based on anonymous sources and of which the authors of said article have seen no evidence as of yet.
Oh yeah and one of the authors of the article has a long history of lying, plagiarizing, and flat out making up sources. One of those sources he made up claimed Karl Rove was going to be indicted. He wasn't of course.
"But I SO want this to be true!"
"I so want to believe Trump is the chosen one!"
Awww, PB and Tgo are such a CUTE couple!
Something tells me Androidpk wasn't aware that one of his new favorite reporters has been a known liar for almost 2 decades now. In fact wasn't he earlier claiming what great journalists they are and shit?
It's okay, Androidpk. Everyone gets fooled every once in a while, but you've been fooled enough to fill hundreds of lifetimes. Maybe it's time to vet the "news" you read a bit better there, buddy.
Do you and PB share your strategies for trolling the PC as you paint each other's toe nails? Adorable.
That clause isn't well defined. Basically there's no actual limit on what you can impeach someone for.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
But, for the record, this is part of what Nixon got impeached for. It was the first article of impeachment, I believe.
Aww, look at the adorable baby. He thinks facts is trolling and citing articles based on anonymous sources from a writer who has been a known liar for almost 20 years is considered real news and evidence that Trump is a Russian asset and needs to be impeached.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
You do time4fun proud. I bet she even allowed you to wash the couch cushions today.
Republicans are the last people on earth to go on about accuracy when it comes to sources. Fox News is your bible, an edutainment channel.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Know how you can tell when a far leftist is losing an argument? They go straight to Fox News. Never fails.
Coming from the troll that always goes after the source. Every. Single. Time. You and PB are two peas in a pod.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Everyone involved in this shit show is a known liar. That's what's so crazy about this. Reporters. Guiliani. Cohen. Manafort. Fuck. Trump can't even buy hamburgers without lying about how many are out there.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Then you gave idiots jumping to a conclusion on both sides because they're believing the lies. I'm waiting for the evidence.
Androidpk had all the evidence he would ever need 940 pages ago (read: none). Once again he made a false claim, failed to provide his nonexistent sources, and is now calling everyone involved in calling out his BS trolls.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
So...normal Friday I guess.
What false claim did I make exactly?
Speculating in politics is half the fun!Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Source?Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Speculating is fine. You've been convinced Trump was a Russian asset from day 1 based on next to nothing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
I never said they didn't. I simply asked you to provide a cite source for your claim that the CIA and FBI believe that Donald Trump is a Russian agent.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Why not just ask the attorney you were going to get to subpoena Kranar for the IP addresses of some people who post here?Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Did you sound that word out in your head and guess at it?Quote:
Originally Posted by sellstuff1
I lied about something that has been plastered all over the news? I know fortybox called you a Mitt Romney but at least Mitt occasionally displays a spine.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stumplicker
Really? Define day 1..Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Look how Androidpk goes straight to the homoerotic when he's been caught being stupid again.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
You've said multiple times this investigation is only because Hillary made up a lie about Trump. Is that why a counter intelligence investigation was started?Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
That the CIA and FBI believe that Donald Trump is a Russian agent.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Also, even if you go back and scrub to pretend you weren't dumb enough to post it.. it's been quoted.
Is that why you're always going straight to the homoerotic material? Because you're always feeling stupid? Don't be ashamed, embrace your homosexuality!Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
In Androidpk's defense.. he didn't have his mental breakdown until August 2017. I'm assuming that was the time period he moved into someone's couch and was given explicit instructions that in lieu of rent, he needs to come here and post like a brain dead retard.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
So why was a CI case opened? I keep asking you why and you keep wildly deflecting.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Let's get back to your claim that the CIA and FBI believe that Donald Trump is a Russian agent. Do you have a cite source on that yet? If you just admit you made that up, we can continue with your question.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthrea...74#post2078174Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
I await your admission. It's free.. it's not like you have any self respect at this point. Not sure why you can't just come clean.
Like I said, wildly deflecting. I'm assuming because you're finally starting to realize that you babbling that this is still a Clinton conspiracy is making you look as unhinged as rocktar.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
On what planet now am I the one deflecting here? YOU made the claim that the CIA and FBI believe that Donald Trump is a Russian agent. I asked you to cite a source that says that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
You've been deflecting like this since:
https://www.reactiongifs.com/r/dflct.gif
Hell, I even gave you an out... admit you simply made it up and we can move forward.
Until then, keep doing what you always do when you are cornered like this:
https://www.reactiongifs.com/r/dflct.gifhttps://www.reactiongifs.com/r/dflct.gifhttps://www.reactiongifs.com/r/dflct.gif
So you still can't admit the CIA/FBI opened up an CI investigation on Trump because of Russia and not simply because Hillary told them to. Shocker. Don't worry, your BF Tgo will come along shortly to help you deflect some more.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
I've never spoken about the CIA / FBI opening up an investigation. Strawman much?Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Now, stop deflecting and just admit you fucked up.
It's simple... and it's free, so you don't have to panhandle again tonight.
This is so fake. She blinks when she is deflecting.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Wonder Woman is FAKEEEEEEEE. But so is PK - so great analogy.
You only mentioned all of this is because Hillary lied about Russia. So admit that you're a partisan hack that doesn't care about facts. Or just deflect some more because you got nothing else. My guess though is you'll just continue to troll and deflect some more.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Agreed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
So.. still no cite source.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Shocking... really.
One.
Trick.
Pony.
Still can't cite anything showing this is all a conspiracy started by Hillary. Shocker. Still deflecting and trolling. Shocker. You're really bad at this, like really bad.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Mueller's team just ran a very rare statement disputing the BuzzFeed Article. Though it wasn't specific about which parts.
They wouldn't have issued that statement for no reason.
I see time4fun beat me to posting that Mueller's team basically said the Buzzfeed story is fake news.
Good job, Androidpk. Keep chasing them ghosts.
Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report that Trump directed Michael Cohen to lie to CongressQuote:
Originally Posted by peam
This post didn't age well at all, and it's not even 24 hours old.
Which is crazy considering how little information they've released publicly.
That's not what they said actually. They were characteristically vague.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
BuzzFeed is standing by their reporting here. They're trying to figure out what exactly the OSC is disputing.
It's an interesting situation.
Vague? This is what they said, according to CNN:Quote:
Originally Posted by time4fun
"BuzzFeed's description of specific statements to the Special Counsel's Office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen's Congressional testimony are not accurate," said Peter Carr, a spokesman for Mueller's office, in a statement.
I don't know how much more specific they can get. They are saying statements, documents, and testimony claimed in the Buzzfeed article are not accurate, a nice way of saying fake news.
Just because the authors of the story are digging their heels in doesn't mean what the special counsel's office said is vague.
Probably because the Democrats were already talking about impeachment based on this report and Mueller's office didn't want them to be called in to provide evidence that didn't exist.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
I suppose there is a small chance that time4fun is alluding to that Mueller's office really does have this evidence but they don't want to have to reveal their evidence just quite yet because they are working on gathering more evidence. But if that were the case I would imagine Mueller's office would have been actually vague, saying something like "There are some inaccuracies in the story." But they specifically called out the specifics of just about the whole story as being inaccurate.
I wonder what the response from people calling for Trump to resign over the Buzzfeed article is now. Likely the same.
It's amazing watching the spin unfold in real time. People are already saying that the statement from Mueller's office basically means nothing because he never used the word "false" but instead said "inaccurate" meaning the entire story overall is true, but some parts of the story are merely "inaccurate."Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
Or that Mueller's office was somehow vague to leave open the possibility that only some parts of the story are inaccurate (but not false!) but regardless Mueller still has the evidence.
Some of the more realistic ones are sort of accepting the Buzzfeed article might be false but it doesn't matter because Mueller has oh so much other evidence on Trump that he will still be impeached.
It's amazing watching people actually believe a Buzzfeed article OVER MUELLER HIMSELF.
Let me recap for those who are not quite caught up.
Buzzfeed: Orange man bad. He committed crime.
Far left: Impeach! Impeach!
Mueller: Buzzfeed is wrong.
Buzzfeed: I'm pretty sure we know more about your investigation than you do, but thanks anyways.
Far left: Wait, is Mueller right?
Buzzfeed: Of course not, the sky is still yellow right?
Far left: Oh yeah, right! Impeach! Impeach!
It's not a Buzzfeed article, it's a Buzzfeed news article. Buzzfeed news has been nominated for a Pulitzer for their journalism work in 2018, and maintains no less than THREE Pulitzer prize-winning journalists.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Your news source is legitimately Fox & Friends. The only awards they've won is the Order of the Red Banner.
Your reading comprehension deficits are showing, as usual.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Mueller's team could have released a statement that said: The OSC has not determined that that President Trump directed Cohen to alter his Congressional testimony. Instead, they released this incredibly vague statement that focused on specific pieces of evidence, not the actual conclusion of the article.
It's almost guaranteed that the sources here were *not* from Mueller's team. The BuzzFeed article positions them specifically as not being a part of the OSC. So this is probably information from one of the other investigations- likely this is from SDNY (who raided Cohen's office).
Secondly- there are already numerous Court filings that more or less support the notion that Cohen was working with people in the Trump orbit to prepare for his Congressional testimony.
Finally- the OSC's release doesn't say that Buzzfeed's conclusion is inaccurate- it's calling into question what the OSC has specifically been told and the characterization of their documents. It actually very much leaves open the possibility that Cohen told SDNY all of this, and *they* relayed it to OSC, for example. It also leaves open the possibility that the culmination of various pieces of evidence lead to this conclusion, but that the OSC doesn't have any single piece of evidence that ties it all together.
I'm not saying that BuzzFeed's article isn't currently in question. I'm saying that the OSC's statement has some really interesting language here, and that's worth paying attention to. We don't know the motivation behind the statement.
If you look at the statements, people were generally very careful to say "IF the article is true, THEN the following should happen".Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
TR;DRQuote:
Originally Posted by time4fun
There are others who omitted the 'if' entirely and simply demanded resignation. While others may have taken the reasonable and fair route, not everyone had.Quote:
Originally Posted by time4fun
My wondering remains specifically with those individuals.
Look at this denial right here on the PC. Isn't it glorious?Quote:
Originally Posted by sellstuff1
Even more denial! Where do you people get your marching orders from? Barely been two hours since Mueller's office themselves said Buzzfeed's article is wrong and you all are already repeating the same shit no matter where I go on the internet.Quote:
Originally Posted by time4fun
“BuzzFeed’s description of SPECIFIC statements TO THE SPECIAL COUNSEL'S OFFICE, and CHARACTERIZATION of documents and testimony OBTAINED BY THIS OFFICE, regarding Michael Cohen’s Congressional testimony are not ACCURATE.”Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Your reading comprehension is about at the fifth grade level if you think that statement completely nullifies the Buzzfeednews report.
The sources for the article are most certainly SDNY. Mueller's folks don't leak.Quote:
Originally Posted by time4fun
He already has his marching orders from alt right websites.Quote:
Originally Posted by sellstuff1
Maybe because Buzzfeed is wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by time4fun
Go away.
Look at the radical far leftists of the board taking this defeat as some sort of victory.
Buzzfeed says the sky is yellow and they believe it.
Projection.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
What defeat exactly? Individual 1 is still a criminal and you're still a useless troll. Don't let me interrupt your meltdown though :lol2:Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
The funniest fucking part of this is the conservatives scrambling to suck Meuller's dick now after calling him a traitor for the past four months.
Are you saying we shouldn’t listen to what Mueller says? Not sure you thought this one through.Quote:
Originally Posted by sellstuff1
Lefties!Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Far lefties!
Radical far lefties!
Extremist radical lefties!
Who would have figured that you being outed as an alt right white supremacist would trigger you so much. :lol:
Alleged criminal.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
PK's daily pavlovian reaction is reaching the level of epic.
Ding!
Stumps doesn’t have one.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Neither do you.
You're retarded.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk