You think it's an insult to say that I want to have gay sex with Trump.
You're not too bright. But I guess you're safe from time4fun's wrath as long as you don't use THE F WORD!!!!
Printable View
What?
This has never, ever been the case. Ever.
Ashliana gets incredibly triggered. Have you not been paying attention? It is STILL upset over red rep comments I left It a decade ago.
Ashliana has always had paper thin skin... which allows me to trigger It so easily.
What the fuck is wrong with you!?
Call me crazy but I don't think Ashlianna really gives a shit about your use of the word faggot. If they did there's a clear discrepancy in the acceptance and use of words aimed at harming gay people. Which isn't the case because 'butt boy', despite being hate speech, is brushed off by them. Which means their reaction to your use of the word 'faggot' is reactionary but in an attempt to have a higher moral ground, to virtue signal if you will, you get the reception of their vitriol. In all its limp glory.
I hope that clears things up. If not, I'm out.
She lost a ton of weight in the last decade. She's super skinny now. Still not really what you would call super hot, but she's not big anymore.
http://image.masslive.com/home/mass-...f7a4dfc9d4.jpg
That said, the first I saw of Amy Schumer, at one of the Comedy Central roasts, I found her hot. Here she is from that:
http://www.contactmusic.com/pics/le/...er_3505554.jpg
And while I'm on a roll, I'll just randomly throw in that I find Nikki Glaser and Sarah Silverman hot also.
Cohen says Mueller has a substantial amount of evidence to back up everything he's testified about. :popcorn:
OMGOMGOMGOMGOMG GUUUUYYYYYYSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!11 IT'S FUCKING HAPPENING GUYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! IT'S FINALLY STARTING TO HEAT UP!!!!!111 FOR REAL THIS TIME YOU GUYS!!!!!!111 TRUMP IS GOING TO PRISON MAYBE EVEN BE EXECUTED AND HILLARY IS GOING TO FINALLY BE PRESIDENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111111111111111 IIIITTTTT'S HAPPPPPPEENNNINNNGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111
The most severe punishment to man awaits him.
https://i.imgur.com/7muJspG.gif
Yes, because if someone is untrustworthy one moment, the instant they begin to depose someone you dislike does not exonerate them from previous skepticism. If anything you should be more critical of whatever he might've found for the reason and purpose that they might be saying things just to gain back favor.
It's one of the oldest tricks in the playbook and you fell for it.
I'm not saying Cohen should be exonerated, and his past lies will certainly be weighed against him. I'm saying if what he has said is backed up by evidence and testimony from other people then it's certainly worth listening to. This is how the court system works in this country.
Trump's all star lawyer Rudy Colludy said no one was murdered so this crime is not a big deal. Good job with that amazing defense. Also good of you to admit Trump committed a crime.
Worst. Lawyer. Ever.
I played Madden 19 and moved the Chargers back to San Diego.
Journalists were kept away from a secret federal appeals court hearing on Friday in Washington, D.C., as officials sealed off an entire floor for arguments in a mysterious grand jury case which some believe could be related to the Special Counsel investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 elections.
The case – known officially as “In re: Grand Jury Subpoena” – has been sealed in its entirety when it comes to public records, as it moved from the district court to the appeals court level in recent months.
Reporters at the courthouse – which is just down the hill from the U.S. Capitol – at first tried to gather outside the courtroom where the secret arguments were going to take place, but then security officials sealed off the entire fifth floor of the building, making it nearly impossible to find out who was involved in the matter.
Well, copying and pasting stuff from your quote didn't work. I tried "secret federal appeals court" first, which came up with nothing, then In re: Grand Jury Subpoena, which came up with several dozen cases ranging from 1995 to now but nothing recent. That led me to believe that this "mysterious" and "secret" case is something that is really not all that out of the ordinary. Coupled with the fact that you are notoriously bad at fact checking your own sources, I decided to come back here and put the burden of proof on you instead of wasting more time.
learn2google
https://i.imgur.com/OIPkbRm.png
I believe most of pk's "sources" for "news" come from the National Enquirer so you might start there. If no luck, move down the totem pole of "trusted" news sources until you get near the bottom to cnn then check there. A lot of pk's stuff is from their "butthurt liberal opinions and wishes" section. Maybe a mod can sticky this post for others who are wondering where he gets all his inaccurate crap. You're welcome.
Grand Jury hearings are always secret. Closing off the press from the area is not earth shattering. If we're making guesses about what it is though, I'd like to throw my hat in with the equally likely assumption as yours that this is about Hillary Clinton being indicted for improper email server upkeep.
Have you literally already forgotten that in your quote you stated that the case is known as "In re Grand Jury Hearing"? Would you like me to quote you for you?
Grand Jury hearings, and things that pertain to them, are sealed, and secret. It is not earth shattering to keep the press out of it, because that's exactly how it's always been done.
Dreeben and Ahmed were speculated to be the OSC lawyers present, which makes me think it's Pence that's challenging the subpoena. Ahmed specializes in Middle Eastern graft and that would tie in with the investigation surrounding Trump's inauguration committee.
He ever recover from that coma he was in?
What are you basing that on? Which Grand jury subpoena are you talking about? And most importantly, how is it unrelated to a grand jury case, whose records and proceedings and things pertaining to the aforementioned are secret, and sealed?
Please cite a source.
Spoiler alert: You can't.
Asking you to cite your sources is not a bitch fit. It's a pretty acceptable request, especially from someone with as poor a track record as yours. I'm still waiting for your source from my previous question, by the way. The source that doesn't actually exist.
Be on whichever side of the political spectrum you like; just stop making others on that side look bad by not paying attention to whether or not what you're posting is true. You're not fooling anyone here or anywhere by claiming your own narrative on stories that don't support it.
I just put 926 yards on the Bengals
Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) told The New Yorker that he plans to subpoena information on President Trump's personal business transactions from Deutsche Bank regarding allegations that the president's financial interests in Russia are affecting his foreign policy positions.
Schiff, who will chair the House Intelligence Committee come January, said he believes answers to whether Trump was involved in money laundering with Russia lie in records held by the German-owned bank, which Trump banked with extensively during the 1990s.
“Is that why Trump is so pro-Russian? Is his financial interest guiding his foreign policy?” Schiff asked in an interview with the magazine.
“We are going to be looking at the issue of possible money laundering by the Trump Organization, and Deutsche Bank is one obvious place to start,” he continued.
His efforts have the support of House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who told The New Yorker that Schiff's takeover of the Intelligence panel would restore credibility to the body.
Mexico's new government is cracking down on illegal immigration, closing illegal points of entry on their border with Guatemala. No word yet from CNN as to whether Mexico's new president is a racist or not.
Wow. A house Democrat is going to subpoena some of Trump's business transactions to try and find some nugget of information that could hopefully be stretched (really, really stretched) into "See? Trump colluded!"
I'm shocked, shocked I tell you. Just never saw that coming.
This is the same bank that gave Trump hundreds of millions of dollars in loans when US banks refused to give Trump anything. This is the same bank that was found to be laundering hundreds of millions for Russians. The very same bank that was recently raided.
But yeah, I'm sure you're right and this is a giant nothingburger :)
Fuck, Brees just got injured.
Out for 3 weeks. I got Teddy Bridgewater Jr in now. He us foing good.
My bad.
Stupid af. I'm 16-0 to the Superbowl, my opponent is the Jacksonville Jaguars at 8-8.
A judge ruled that Obamacare is unconstitutional now because the penalty for not having insurance has been removed.
This will be interesting if the supreme court agrees. It will be like Obama's presidency never even happened.
Elizabeth Warren FINALLY admitted she's not a person of color.
So still no mention of a YouTube video just like I said? Yet you’re doing your retarded victory dance anyway.
This is why we laugh at you.
Where does it say a protest over a YouTube video?Quote:
Originally Posted by retard’s incoming response
You’re stupid.
Stop being a dipshit.
Feels like it's been weeks since everyone was screaming about how "Individual 1" was going to jail. What's taking SDNY so long to charge Trump with a crime since they have oh so much evidence that he committed one?
Almost as if they don't really have any evidence of a crime and instead used an indictment against Cohen to push a narrative they wanted the mindless lemmings to repeat. And hey look at that, our most well known lemming Androidpk was right there to do their bidding.
What a brave resister!
Not to mention the tweet doesn't even make sense.
Manafort and Gates were charged with crimes that had nothing to do with Trump, most of which took place before Trump even ran for president.
Flynn pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI, which is not a crime he "did for" Trump.
I could go through the rest of the nonsense but why even bother. It's obvious the tweet was thrown out as chum for the likes of morons such as Ashliana and Androidpk who don't care about silly things such as facts, they just want to read as much Trump bashing as they can get their hands on.
Because you, Tgo, bastion of good faith, are actually asking someone to respond to your "inquiry"? Right. Here you go, then.
You not understanding the speed of the justice system isn't a reflection on the justice system -- it's a reflection on you, of your ignorance. The investigations into (and prosecutions of) the Trump clan have been fast and resulted in numerous convictions. If you think all this momentum -- and Trump's ongoing meltdown on Twitter -- isn't indicative of what's to come, and this is the point it's all going to stop, I've got a bridge to sell you in Alaska.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Yeah, they had no evidence ... from that search warrant they executed on the counsel of the president of the United States .. that he was hysterically raving about the death of attorney/client privilege about on Twitter. And despite that, it's just totally weird that they -- according to brilliant legal scholar Tgo01 -- have "no evidence," despite securing his guilty plea to a dozen charges.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Breitbart or Fox should hire you for your expert opinion. You're at least as skilled as Tomi Lahren.
Your failure to read the news reflects only on you. Manafort was subject to two ongoing investigations and prosecutions, one about his past tax evasion and failure to report foreign holdings -- those are the charges he was mostly found guilty on, and the one open Trump supporter caused a hung jury on the others. Manafort decided to plead guilty and cooperate regarding the second prosecution, specifically that related to the campaign and conspiracy to defraud the US, and making false Foreign Agent Registration Act filings. Then, in the past two weeks, the special counsel certified in federal court that they had evidence Manafort violated his plea agreement ... by colluding with known Russian spies ... and the Trump administration ... up until now. In 2018.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Gates' guilty plea lays out his involvement in conspiring with Manafort -- which, we know according to the special counsel's filing in court, that involved conspiring with known Russian intelligence agents.
Even Fox's top legal analyst is saying he expects Trump to get indicted. But, uhh, stay tuned and keep hoping that your willful ignorance somehow plays out for Trump. Never change, Tgo.
And you have the audacity to claim I don't know what I'm talking about. The conspiracy to defraud the US charge has NOTHING to do with Trump's campaign. That specifically refers to his supposed money laundering, not reporting his foreign financial deals, and for failing to register as a foreign agent. Again all of which took place before Trump even ran for president.
Now do what you do best, ignore me correcting you and deflect to some other such nonsense. Perhaps you can pull up another tweet or two for you and Androidpk can jack each other off to.
You still think this is a vast left wing conspiracy, so no, you don't know what you're talking about.
I'll go ahead and just take your word for it because I don't really care enough to see if you're telling the truth. So by crimes these people "did for" Trump, we are talking about shit they did AFTER Trump already won and was president, and not like during the campaign during supposed Russian collusion?
See this is why you morons shouldn't get your talking points about politics from a "comedian's" twitter feed, because you come off looking like a bunch of ill-informed lemmings.
All Flynn had to do was be a good little boy scout and just wait for his sentencing hearing but now his antics might see him locked up after all :lol:
There was a slight change made in Flynn's sentencing memo from saying no jail time to saying give the lower end of the guideline.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dus6Hv7VYAAwN0Z.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dus8aNPU8AAzH37.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dus-Pf-UcAAfBoZ.jpg
If they haven't found a tape of Russian prostitutes urinating on Trump, then they should call off the whole investigation.
Fox News legal analyst Napolitano speculates Trump may have already been indicted in secret to get around the statutes of limitations issue.
LOLOLOLOLOLOL OMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMG GUYS!!!!!!! TRUMP IS GETTING INDICTED AND JAILED AND THEN EXECUTED AND THEN HILLARY WILL FINALLY BE PRESIDENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 IT'S JUST ALL BEING DONE IN SECRET SO WE DON'T KNOW ABOUT IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I TOLD YOU IT WAS GOING TO HEAT UP, NOW IT IS, BUT WE DON'T HAVE A THERMOMETER TO TEST IT BECAUSE IT'S SECRET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111111111111
It was sounding like the cantankerous old judge at Flynn's sentencing hearing today was just about to send him to jail. Flynn's lawyers and the special counsel lawyers quickly suggested that the judge postpone the sentencing until 2019 when the judge would be better able to see how useful Flynn had been.
Trump attacking our free press again with these two tweets!
Quote:
One disappointment about DC is the gossip that masquerades as “reporting.” This story has: - Not a SINGLE named or verifiable source - Only ONE on-the-record comment, which is a denial. My dad had a name for junk articles like this: “Birdcage lining.”
Naww just kidding, that's actually the left's latest and greatest star saying those things, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Strangely enough no one has called her out for attacking our free press or said she's trying to destroy our democracy, even though she's saying THE EXACT SAME THING Trump has often attacked the press for. So weird.Quote:
For the record, this is the second @politico article about me in a short period of time with *0* named sources to back claims containing false information. Their articles are printed + distributed to **Congressional offices** - w/ no named sources. It’s really unfortunate.
Been hauling gold all day. Almost done, then I can upgrade to an Adder and haul more stuff in less time.
Everyone was wondering who it was that's fighting Mueller's grand jury subpoena. Turns out it isn't a person, it's a corporation, owned by a currently unnamed country.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Duu0EyPXgAAGtSz.jpg
My money is on it being Rosneft.
And holy crap, I can carry so much cargo now.
Now to save up 31m for a Type 7.
Kinda wanna grind out for an Imperial Cutter. That rep though.
In the span of just a few days Rudy Colludi has gone from saying Trump never signed a letter of intent for Trump Tower Moscow to saying ok he signed a letter of intent but it's not a big deal. :lol:
I bet Androidpgay stayed up for a week coming up with "Rudy Colludi" and thinks it's the most clever most creative thing in the history of all clever and creative things.
What a stupid loser. :lol:
Taking bets on how long it takes for Trump to flip on colludy and tries to take credit for coming up with that zinger
Of course Trump is eventually going to turn on Rudy and try to pin the blame on him. It's why the former WH counselor McGahn went to Mueller and testified for over 30 hours, because he feared Trump was going to try and shift the blame to him. Rudy, unfortunately, is too fucking stupid to realize this.
A small part of me hopes Trump gets removed from office just so we can see the ultratards lose their shit when they realize Hillary still won't be president. Because those people really do exist that think if Trump gets removed then Hillary will be president.
Also, I've reported myself to Simu for my recent microaggression against you in the form of time4correction.
I'm on the edge of my seat wondering if Mike Pence turns out to also be a Russian Spy! Or maybe it'll get changed up and they'll start asking for his Kenyan birth certificate. This stupid teeter totter our politics function on now is getting old.
I hate Trump. I think he's done damage to the economy that affects both businesses and the everyday person, but those policies will be reversed at latest when he's out of office, and likely before that. Yes, Trump is narcissitic, impulsive, and his actions reflect poorly on the country on the world stage, but these are things that the entire world knew decades before he was elected.
The sky has not fallen. Civilization has not degenerated into roving bands of grunting neo nazis tearing down statues of Abraham Lincoln. Mexicans are not being riddled with .50 caliber rounds when approaching the border.
None of these things happened any more than Obama sent stormtroopers into everyone's homes to take all their guns.
Too much of politics has devolved into people frothing at the mouth and screaming "The end is nigh!"
I refer to far leftists because there are some good leftists on the board who aren't raging racist, sexist idiots like yourself there. Taernath is a good example. I would just say "leftists" but I don't want to lump the good ones in with the bad ones so I refer to them as "far leftists."
Understand now, far leftist?
Trump is so tough on Russia that sanctions, which have been delayed for almost an entire year, have been lifted on certain Russian assets. GG!
Ohhh nooo...you mean we're not going to have troops in the middle of a giant clusterfuck in the Middle East anymore? The sky is falling!
If there's one thing I know, it's that sending troops to mess with the Middle East has always been a good idea, every single time it's been done throughout history. It has never once exacerbated the issue.
I'm pretty sure we're good with Russia because of a big red button.
I'm pretty surprised you haven't revealed that all of your knowledge of the President of the United States being a Russian sleeper agent was revealed to you by aliens while you were in your bunker hiding from government mind control chemtrails. Excuse me. Sorry. Russian government mind control chemtrails.
If there was still any doubt that the judge in the Flynn case is nothing but a left leaning partisan hack this should go ahead and make it crystal clear: He has now ordered the federal government to return asylum seekers to the US who have already been deported. I have never heard of such a ruling before. Seriously has anyone ever heard of a judge ordering the federal government to bring back people to the US it has already deported? This is some amazing work by this so called impartial judge.
If the decision to deport them was ruled as incorrect, then why wouldn't they be brought back? Some of Trump's changes were specifically targeted to make the deportation process quicker. Were you thinking that it was like football, where if you get the next play off, you can't challenge? The courts don't work that way, whether or not you agree with the ruling.
Why would the federal government be forced to bring them back? Grant them new asylum applications, sure. Give them new hearings, fantastic. Actually telling the federal government to arrange to have the people brought back to the US until their new asylum applications work through the court system? That's just the most absurd thing I've ever heard of. No, wait, I take that last part back, I'm about to read two posts from Androidpk.
What? I specifically was referring to your post about us pulling troops out of Syria, I even quoted it. The only person who mentions sanctions with you. Honestly are you suffering from a stroke at the moment? It's the only thing that would explain your more-retarded-than-usual posts.
You mean the judge who was appointed to his current position by Clinton? Let me guess, you had no clue he was a Clinton appointee and were relying on some bullshit CNN article you read that left that part out right?
The Federal government was the one that moved them out. They now have the financial responsibility to move them back in. If a towing company illegally tows your car, it's not your financial responsibility to have it returned if the courts rule in your favor. It's the towing company's.
We're not talking about my fucking car, we are talking about people coming to this country illegally then saying "Oh...uhh asylum!" Then our government saying "Nope, doesn't look like a legit asylum case, back you go." Then a federal judge saying "Naww dawg, you grant them new asylum cases and bring them back to the US until their cases work through the system, should only take a few years."
You don't have much experience with towing companies do you? If you car is towed illegally, they just don't charge you to let it out, they aren't going to bring it back to you. If you want extra money you have to go ahead and sue them. Just like each and every single person effected by this would need to sue the US Government to come back, because they aren't going to go looking for them.
No. We're not talking about people coming to this country illegally. We're talking about a ruling stating that their reason for being here was not illegal, and wrongly called illegal.
To my understanding, when a deportation removal happens, the deported is sent back to their country of origin. When a deportation is ruled as having been illegal, the response should be what? "lol jk. walk here from Guyana again and try a second time."? If that were the case you could just fast track all deportations and send them as far away as possible. Problem solved? No more immigration?
Yes, I mentioned sanctions then you stupidly brought up war with Russia for no reason. Are YOU having a stroke?
His initial federal judge position was because of Reagan you twit. Being appointed to the current position he has by Bill Clinton isn't exactly a super big secret. Keep being a mouth breathing Alex Jones wannabe, thinking everyone is a deep state agent of the Clintons. :lol:Quote:
You mean the judge who was appointed to his current position by Clinton? Let me guess, you had no clue he was a Clinton appointee and were relying on some bullshit CNN article you read that left that part out right?
Looks like Mark Zuckerburg perjured himself. Let's heat this Russian Investigation up and get Mueller on him.