Nice to see you being completely incapable of rebutting my points and resorting to ad hominem. GG, brosephina.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Printable View
Nice to see you being completely incapable of rebutting my points and resorting to ad hominem. GG, brosephina.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
From today:
Also from today:Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
http://forum.gsplayers.com/member.php?4828-KierpheQuote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
https://media.giphy.com/media/10tpZi2Ged3s8E/giphy.gif
Also, oxys are still around? Guess you would be the one to know, you depressed mongoloid.
Absolutely nobody is surprised that your reading comprehension is so poor that you need this spelled out for you:Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
A) "Kranar has full permission to confirm this is my only account" isn't mutually exclusive with
B) the notion that I ever, in days long since past, had more than one account.
Very convincing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
How is "Kranar can confirm I only have one account" not mutually exclusive with the fact that you have at least 2 accounts on here?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
I like how your go to response for everything when you get called out for being full of shit is "Something something reading comprehension something something" while proving the point being made against you, yet being too dumb to realize it, and then you double down on your stupid even more.
Since you probably didn't understand any of that, I'll dumb it down some for you:
Your other account, Kierphe, still exists, right here on the PC. Therefore you have more than one account. Whether you still post on it or not is irrelevant, as is the fact that you apparently scrubbed all the posts made from it like a dumb twatto. :lol:
I know basic thinking is hard for you, especially since you already live in a fantasy world as it is, but 2 > 1.
https://i.imgur.com/pmsKX9Y.png
^ Is this not your other account brings your account total to at least 2, which is still more than 1? Yes. Yes it is.
I've stated multiple times, over multiple years, when you retards have baselessly accused other people of secretly being me, that Kranar has full permission to verify that I'm not the other person. Does that other account I posted on a decade ago still exist? Yes, because there isn't (or at least, I'm not aware) of an option in vBulletin to delete an account. Have I participated in contentious topics, like in the politics folder, on any other account? Nope.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
"I've only posted from one account here in the last decade" isn't functionally different from "I have only one account." You're being literal to the point of being intellectually disingenuous -- or your reading comprehension is comically poor, because you don't understand what colloquial speech is, or you're responding in bad faith. Neither would be surprising. Both make you a jackass.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
My bad, I didn't realize that we're adding stipulations and moving the goal post now. Otherwise feel free to quote where you previously made this stipulation today in your string of outraged depressed loser posts. You won't, because you can't, because you didn't, and now you're trying to move the goal posts. Classic Ashliana.Quote:
Have I participated in contentious topics, like in the politics folder, on any other account? Nope.
You: I only have one account! Kranar can confirm this!
Me: You have at least two accounts, everyone knows this
You: No I don't! Reading comprehension!
Me: Here's proof, which everyone including you is already aware of. Stop being a liar.
You: I mean I only have one account that I post in the politics folder with, DUH! Reading comprehension! You're being too literal even though I waited until just now to state this part!
Also you:
https://media1.tenor.com/images/8311...e7bd/tenor.gif
I have several accounts on here that I haven't logged into in years.
Know what that means? It means I still have more than one account.
You not understanding (or pretending not to understand) colloquial speech doesn't somehow constitute an argument. Nor does doubling down on it. Even humoring you, "I literally have access to only one account" -- the nonsensically literal stance you've taken in order to be a jackass -- changes to the functionally identical "Have I participated in contentious topics, like in the politics folder, on any other account? Nope."Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
You're exactly as retarded as I think you are if you think that you being forced out of desperation to resort to belligerently word lawyering (because you couldn't find a way to respond substantively) is somehow a win for you.
Feel free to quote the post(s) from today where you stipulated either "I only post in politics from this account!" or "I don't even have access to my other account!" as opposed to shrieking about how Kranar can confirm you only have 1 account and pretty much noting else. Excluding the post I'm quoting now as well as the one before it, because you're retarded enough to quote those and be like "See it's right here!" like a dickwipe.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Kranar would just simply confirm that both accounts belong to you. Kranar also doesn't know which passwords you remember or don't remember. Nor would he give a fuck about any of this in the first place.
You must have increased your estrogen doses, as you seem to think everyone should just know what you're thinking without needing to actually say it.
Keep doubling down on being a massive retard though. It's pretty great.
Again: you ignoring the context in which I spoke to as narrowly define it as possible in order to win internet word lawyering points doesn't actually constitute an argument. The point being that I've never been any of the people the hysterical conservatives on here have accused me of being, which Kranar can confirm.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
You thinking getting me to clarify from one position to the other as an enormous "win" for you is funny, but sad. Take your victories where you can get them, I suppose.
If you can quote the post from today that provides all this context you claim to have offered, I will formally apologize to you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Otherwise, none of what you're saying changes the fact that:
- You said that you only have one account, with no "...that I post in politics with!" or "...that I remember my login for!" context accompanying it.
- You have more than one account
- You're notorious for being delusional and full of shit and moving goal posts and doubling down on your ultra retardedness.
But like I said, quote/link the post from today where you provided all this context and I'll be happy to apologize.
This also isn't a win/lose situation. It's
^ Greatest post ever.
Holy shit.
All the context is in the first post you replied to: "Oh, joy. The seventh (or is it eighth?) person a hysterical conservative has incorrectly accused me of being now? Once again, Kranar has full permission to confirm this is my only account."Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
One could read that mean either "this is the only account I use" or "Ashliana is claiming that he literally has access to only one account." Given the context that you know at one point I used the other account, as do the other frequent posters on the folder, and the people participating in this conversation, which do you think is more likely? Ding, ding, ding, ding!
So, like I said, you've resorted to being deliberately intellectually disingenuous or you're, in actuality, retarded as shit. Take your pick.
It's funny, you far left mongoloids have been saying pretty much this exact same thing about each and every person who was associated with Trump or his campaign...until that is Mueller threatened any of them with perjury or another crime and they took a plea deal and suddenly they are the most honest person to have ever lived.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
I consider myself to have one account. But in technical legal terms, I have two. I barely used this other account and haven't posted in it for well over a decade. I have lost the password and the email address I used to create the other account was deleted years ago. So I have no access to the other account.
So if I were to say "I have one account" and someone else were to accuse me of lying and having two accounts, I would laugh at that person.
That’s some fucking crazy woman logic there. You must be proud of yourself to have reached such a level of tardness, especially given your history of being delusional and full of shit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Also since I forgot to ask earlier...
Which account did you mean to reply with when this happened?Quote:
You might want to work on that reading comprehension. And beeteedubs, I never claimed that the second account accidentally agreed with myself. The only "accident" was replying with the wrong account, which is how I was found out. How else do you imagine that happened? Perhaps if you're going to desperately cling to decade-old forum drama, you should get the basic elements right. You might want to lay off the oxycontin for a few days, let your brain catch up
http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e6...3/Assliana.jpg
You basically just said you meant to agree with Kierphe as Kierphe, but accidentally agreed with yourself as Ashliana instead.
Both make you a jackass.
Have you ever been caught agreeing with yourself on an alt account and/or have a history of being delusional and full of shit though?Quote:
Originally Posted by Candor
This is all aside from the fact that Kranar can fix any “I don’t have that email anymore and I forgot my password!” issues within minutes anyway.
Hey Ashliana, maybe when you ask Kranar to confirm that you only have one account, you could also ask him to fix the login issues for your second account. Sounds like a swell plan, no?
EVERQuote:
Originally Posted by Stanley Burrell
OOFQuote:
Originally Posted by Methais
I knew someone had that screenshotted. Even scrubbing post history can't save you.
You keep saying the same thing over and over and over again. Why not just copy/paste your stupidity?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
You actually believe I was somehow hitting on you.. that's as fucking hilarious as the first day you tried to pass that off as reality.
Dude.. you can't get a date in real life.. stick to catfishing over the Internet. It's literally the only way someone would ever consider it.
Or go pay for it.
Here's the stupidity excuse rearing up it's ugly head once again.Quote:
You might want to work on that reading comprehension. And beeteedubs, I never claimed that the second account accidentally agreed with myself. The only "accident" was replying with the wrong account, which is how I was found out. How else do you imagine that happened? Perhaps if you're going to desperately cling to decade-old forum drama, you should get the basic elements right. You might want to lay off the oxycontin for a few days, let your brain catch up.
Let's get this "straight" once and for all. Your excuse is: You accidentally logged into the wrong account to quote your other account? So.. you really wanted to log into Kiephre account to quote a post from Kiephre saying you agreed with Kiephre?
I would say you could come up with a better excuse.. one that could actually make sense... but let's be honest: You're a fucking retard.
I KNEW someone would save this! I searched the forums and only found a tiny one.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
THANK YOU METHAIS! It would be ashamed to have this level of epic fucking failure to be lost for future generations.
I wish I could take credit, but Google is the real hero today.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
https://i.imgur.com/9ecmovw.png
Right at the top, same place time4fun gets all her research from. :lol:
Which leads to this post
http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthrea...ments/page1061
Doctorate in information technology right there.
I have a degree in boxing now too from playing Creed VR.Quote:
Originally Posted by Taernath
You don’t wanna throw hands with this.
"I'm in the red because ParkBandit feels the need to give me a -2000 rep..."Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
LOLOL
Taken another way, you right-wing troglodytes have been sure that the people surrounding Trump are innocent as pie, and Mueller is railroading them --- until they start cooperating and the floodgates of disclosures start flowing. Then they're magically transformed from "great guys" to "barely involved coffee boys."Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Kudos on your logic getting called out by a totally unrelated poster and then, without missing a beat, acting like your deliberate bullshit isn't dishonest without batting an eye. You should work for Trump - perfect fit with Kellyanne Conway. Send your resume in.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Again, you don't seem to, erm, exactly remember the details ... of the thing 10 years ago .. that you're salivating over. PB made that image, but it wasn't of the moment I got revealed. I mean, you're not so much of an inbred, oxy-addicted redneck that you understand that, right -- what words in your native language mean?Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Uh, no. You literally don't even get what's being discussed. Again, you seem to not understand that that picture isn't of the moment I let the cat out of the bag. Despite trying to bring it up to score points. Classic Methais.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Almost literally everything you wrote in that entire shat-out post was based on your poor reading comprehension or completely invented. Seriously.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
You literally made that. I mean, I'm usually joking when I say you have Alzheimer's, but.. uh.. You might want to see a doctor.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
:rofl: I did copy and paste that. Check my post history and you'll find it a few pages back, the last time you brought it up. And no, I never said you were "hitting on me" -- I said you spent huge amounts of time dreaming up angry, sexualized imagery to send other men. What drove you to do it -- your mental illness, homophobia, repressed urges, etc., is a matter of speculation and is your own personal demon to figure out.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Also, be sure to spend the five seconds it would take (sorry, 30 minutes -- you're in your 60's now and don't know how to use the Internet) to learn what "catfishing" actually means.
Your reading comprehension is off the charts poor. You, like Methais, don't seem to be able to comprehend -- or at least, recall -- that the moment I fucked it up wasn't the moment in that image. Apparently that's the only thing you remember, despite spending literally a decade reminiscing about it. The moment you (or whoever it was) "found out" was when I replied to myself on one of the two accounts, mistakenly referring to myself as the same name, and you (or one of the other board conservatives) caught on. I deleted the fuck up post like 10 seconds after I fucked it up, and you've been erroneously mischaracterizing the few things you do remember (or have invented) since. Then, when you brought it up again years later, you, like now, got the details wrong and were all pissy that I wouldn't help you remember the details. Absolutely none of this is "an excuse," as you're retardedly claiming here. You literally don't remember what happened. Your failure to remember you've been jerking off about since is your problem, dude. Whether or not you remember the details doesn't mean I wasn't a stupid kid in my early 20's.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
The difference between you and I is that I spent like a 10 day period posting as that account, a handful of times, in a harmless conversation about Sarah Palin. You, on other hand, as a fifty year old man, spent literally more than a decade sending other men furious, sexual imagery you dreamed up, full of your trademarked impotent rage.
So, yeah. Let's be honest. You're a fucking retard -- and further, in desperate need of psychiatric care.
Hey replying with "NOU!" is Androidpk's thing and it's literally the only thing he has ever done well in his entire life. Don't think you're gonna come along and steal his spotlight.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
We need a thread where we google random pc shit and post the results.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Like
https://i.imgur.com/Ysgc4ad.png
Why are all the posts scrubbed?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Wow, I look and see how much the forum blew up in the past 24 hours or so and bingo, Ashliana is back. And better yet, it is telling people that they suffer from mental illness. That is like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez telling someone they don't understand economics. Seriously, you are fun to watch with all your spewings sometimes and this is just too far. Give it a rest and move on to some other deflection or method of denial.
Taken another way, you alt-left-wing retards have been sure that the people surrounding Trump are guilty as sin and Mueller is going to get them --- until they start cooperating and the floodgates of disclosures start flowing. Then they're magically transformed from "terrible people who are too dumb to know anything" to "patriotic Americans who are bravely standing up to President Trump"Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
I was going to go through the rest of your nonsense post.. but the stupidity is too much to deal with in a rational way.
Needless to say, I am very happy you are STILL upset about the red rep you've received from me. It had the exact reaction I knew it would.
Thank you for playing the role of queer puppet... it's a role you've mastered.
The sentencing memorandum and its highly redacted addendum cause me to believe that there are still many more shoes to drop. The memorandum refers to an entire criminal investigation that is totally redacted, apparently unrelated to the Russia collusion investigation, and apparently being conducted by a prosecution team other than the special counsel investigation that is headed by Mueller. I can't imagine any reason for so many redactions unless other indictments are expected.
:rofl: All but that final one was up, for years. They were deleted in like 2012 when PB lost his mind over Romney losing and completely gave up the pretense of trying to defend his retarded "positions" and brought it up like 4 times in a 6 week period.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Oh, look! The dingbat troll who's so insane even the other dingbats avoid him has something to say! Tell me more about QAnon and Alex Jones.Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~
That makes no sense, but as we know -- almost nothing you do says. They're guilty as sin. Most of them have started cooperating when the writing's been on the wall -- imagine, a right-wing stooge that's comically corrupt and a Trump sycophant -- THEY can see the writing on the wall, and they legal peril they're in -- and not even you can. That's some mighty impressive stupidity on your part.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Erm, no. They've transformed from terrible people who were completely complicit with conspiring with Russia -- or whatever illegality they were participating -- until it became slightly more advantageous to work with law enforcement rather than against it, but still terrible. Remember when conservatives used to pretend to be about law and order? Yeah -- you dropped that pretense fast when it became apparent that you turned a willfully blind eye to obvious criminality.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
In your 15 years on this forum, and 46,000 posts, you've done things "in a rational way" a number of times one could count on their hands.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
:rofl: If you read the thread you're, again, salivating over.. you'd see that was a rep I left in response to someone who left to me asking why I was red. I know you're obsessed with reputation -- you've used it to salve the wounds you suffered when you were exposed as a raging, sociopathic lunatic who spent a decade -- as a fifty year old man -- leaving furious, sexualized fantasies to other men anonymously on the Internet.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Oh look, you are so bad you can't even come up with a better insult. Have you decided what sex or species you are this week? Are you off your meds and posting or on your meds and lucid enough to remember how to operate the computer to post?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
One doesn't need a better insult. Unlike yours, mine are based on your demonstrable actions -- you've unironically cited InfoWars multiple times. Example: http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthrea...23#post1205523. Archived, permanently.Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~
Second example: http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthrea...67#post2007867, Archived permanently.
You are the parody of conservatives that regular people accuse conservatives of being.
Holy shit, Ashliana is triggered as fuck.
Oh well, back to Destiny 2.
This is correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
Just because you don't like the source doesn't mean the message is wrong. But then again, anything you Leftist disagree with must be derided, ignored or vilified because of course you are so much smarter than the rest of the world and could never be wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Again, are you off your meds and that is why you are posting?
OR
Are you on your meds and finally lucid enough to remember how to operate the boards to post?
I can't tell because you posts are just as shit as always.
tr;drQuote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Ah, yes.. Infowars is only a pariah because "leftists disagree with it." Do you go through your life totally mystified at why the overwhelming majority of your fellow conservatives don't read the site?Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~
Spoiler Alert: I don't think MotherJones and MoveOn are good sources of information. The only difference is that you, apparently, are incapable of telling that InfoWars is a conspiracy site several rungs below even MotherJones and MoveOn.
But by all means, tell other people they're "off their meds" are you defend your citation of literal conspiracy sites.
Spoiler alert, you are still a moron.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Again, are you off your meds and that is why you are posting?
OR
Are you on your meds and finally lucid enough to remember how to operate the boards to post?
I can't tell because you posts are just as shit as always.
You couldn't be a more perfect parody of a retarded conservative if you actively tried. Well done, sir.Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~
At least I know what sex I am and what my sexual preference is every day.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
You are still a moron.
What's that? A homophobic conservative? I've never heard of such a thing! It's almost as if... you're a walking, talking parody of a conservative, precisely like I said! Well done, sir.Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~
Quote:
Originally Posted by Koars Light
No jail time because he cooperated early on in the investigation and his cooperation helped convince other people to step forward and testify. He also meth with the special counsel 19 times and provided testimony to the grand jury as well as hard evidence to back up his claims. He's also helping out with 3 different investigations.
LOL.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Let's see...Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Bold? ✔
Italics? ✔
Bold Italics? ✔
Copy/paste faux outrage? ✔
Misconstrued (sorry PK) sexual messages? ✔
Screw loose? ✔
Is there anyone on this message board that believes calling someone else a cocksnorkling faggot is a sexualized message besides you? I apologize if you thought this was some sort of come on.
Oh who am I trying to kid... I don't really apologize. I think it's sad you actually believe that.. but to me, it's hilarious. Goes to show you how utterly devoid of real human contact you are.
I'd say get off the Internet and go out to some queer bar.. but let's be honest: You're better off pretending to be something you are not.
Tripling down still doesn't change reality. Much to your obvious dismay, the screeds that exposed you as mentally ill weren't just you calling someone "a cocksnorkling faggot." As a 50 year old man, you spent countless hours over the course of more than a decade sending other men angry, sexualized fantasies full of your trademarked impotent rage.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
You are a complete sociopath. You badly need psychiatric care.
You might have deluded yourself -- like Trump, whom you voted for constantly does -- that blindly insisting you didn't do something that everybody can pull up and view the record of somehow didn't happen, but unfortunately for both you and Trump, you don't have the power to magically warp reality to suit your delusions.
https://media.giphy.com/media/U1XhGr8CWqvVC/giphy.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
He forgot something...Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
WHAT ABOUT YOUR 1 BLOG POST!?!?!?!?Quote:
In your 15 years on this forum, and 46,000 posts, you've done things "in a rational way" a number of times one could count on their hands.
http://s2.quickmeme.com/img/84/8491c...edc689dc7e.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
I’m not sure what triggered It, but since cwolff is gone, time4fun is hoping her recent stupidity will be forgotten and Backlash keeps missing Drunk Tuesday’s.. we should all be thankful that we still have Ashliana to entertain us.
By the way, It.. does all the red rep messages calling me old mean you have some weird fag fetish for old guys?
Because no means no.
#metoo
It always starts like this, right? Someone posted something that started a response here on the boards and now the opposite side is the victim. You're not a victim. You are literally one in the same. Here! Let's take a fewer steps down.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Mhm, except you yourself have proven that the bulk of posting doesn't matter, as you appear to be able to address them. It's strange, how a forum works like that. This is also a constant whenever someone disagrees with another person here in the politics folder, "Oh they are toxic and hostile! Look at this environment they made! Woe is me!" Yet it doesn't stop you from emulating the same behavior.Quote:
-- who make up the large bulk of posting -- has literally spent years creating the "toxic" and "hostile" environment you're now decrying in bad faith.
Because your character and morals are dogshit and you really just wanted an excuse to scream retard back.
Go ahead and grab your examples. I'm pretty sure you'll have them on hand! Ready to go! Since you're just a beacon of well informed and ready to... sorry I can't stop laughing and it's making it hard to type. I don't think you engaged anyone in a manner most normal people would label as a 'constructive argument'. I'm pretty sure what happened is you kept linking and making the same assertions, people offered links and you became offended somehow because your spine is made of provolone while your character is made of swiss.Quote:
And yes, if you actually cared, I can show you plenty of topics I engaged in good faith, with Tgo, Methais, even PB -- because they're often substantively, demonstrably incorrect on the topic.
Yes. I am challenging your character because in every instance of 'blame the trolls(or people you disagree with)' the common thread is, spoiler alert, someone from "the Left" being a piss baby about how they get treated when they act like a fucking tool.
Aw, you take Wrathbringer calling you a retard to heart. It's almost like... you don't realize that Wrath is gonna Wrath and it's super easy to deal with it. Just don't have a sandy vagina and be a piss baby.Quote:
And how do the board conservatives respond? Spoiler Alert: Not with counter-arguments. Isn't it funny how you're sitting here arguing with me instead of, say, Wrathbringer, whose total contribution to the forum is to recycle the same "You're retarded" post hundreds of times?
I'll be waiting for those links. I did request 'em, I want to see what you believe is 'good faith'. I won't be holding my breath. In fact, probably what's going to happen is you're gonna do another Italic and Bold piss storm at me. Which is fine, you'll once again prove your lack of morals and character. You can't help yourself and that's fine. I get it.
Maybe seek counseling.
If you chase It away and I have to coax It into coming back.. I’m not going to be happy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
Please. You're the one whining about people are being "toxic" and "hostile" while simultaneously ignoring the reason it's toxic and hostile, seeking to blame only one side. Sticking your fingers in your ears over the point you yourself brought up makes you look like an idiot.Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
Again, you're the one decrying the toxic and hostile state of the folder ... while deliberately ignoring and/or mischaracterizing the reasons the folder's in the state that it's in. You're the one bringing this up, because you were apparently super triggered and attached a load of your emotional baggage to my use of the term "board conservatives" to describe the right-wing clique on here. Then you made the claim that "I'm the same as sellstuff1," and when called out on it, you spectacularly failed to substantiate your contention.Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
:rofl: You're sitting here bullshitting out your ass as hard as you can. If only you were in a position to judge anyone else's "character and morals." Not in this universe, buddy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
You seem pretty preoccupied with the notion of "character." Quite predictably, though, you've only applied your "standard" to one party -- despite the other repeatedly engaging in bad faith, trolling and shitposting. And why is that, I wonder?Quote:
Go ahead and grab your examples. I'm pretty sure you'll have them on hand! Ready to go! Since you're just a beacon of well informed and ready to... sorry I can't stop laughing and it's making it hard to type. I don't think you engaged anyone in a manner most normal people would label as a 'constructive argument'. I'm pretty sure what happened is you kept linking and making the same assertions, people offered links and you became offended somehow because your spine is made of provolone while your character is made of swiss.
Rephrasing yourself a dozen times doesn't change the content of what you're saying. You continue to 1) decry the hostile state of the folder, 2) ignore the reason the folder's in the state that it is, 3) selectively and arbitrarily assign blame to only one side of that forum. Countless threads on here were started by one of the board's left-leaning posters, and the first page of the thread is inevitably one of the right-wing trolls posting insults and absolutely nothing substantive. The reverse basically never happens. And yet, lo and behold, here you are whining about the liberals on the board.Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
Nope. It's just that you're sitting here, in completely bad faith, shitting out BS while having made absolutely no effort to mention the lowest-hanging fruit on the folder -- Wrathbringer -- making it "toxic" and "hostile," qualities you supposedly don't like.Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
You are absolutely braindead if you think that not providing those links somehow demonstrates a "lack of morals of character." You are the personification of bad faith. But, as requested -- because unlike you, I actually back up what I say -- here you go -- since I said "with Tgo, Methais, even PB":Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
Tgo: http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthrea...e-stupid/page2 / http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthrea...y-voting/page5 / http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthrea...eelected/page2
Methais: http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthrea...is#post1981896 / http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthrea...ot-Story/page3 / http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthrea...some&p=1975260 / http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthrea...is#post1974099 / http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthrea...ming&p=1969858 / http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthrea...Dead&p=1967939
Parkbandit: http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthrea...-France/page10 / http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthrea...-France/page12
(Mixture): http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthrea...Emails/page128
Perhaps you should consult one of these:Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
https://target.scene7.com/is/image/T...=488&fmt=pjpeg
It's pretty well known that when literally you, cwolff, time4fun, and pk aren't posting in politics, this place is peaceful as fuck, to the point of things getting a little bit boring, and there's little to no bickering, arguing, people ripping each other new assholes, etc., despite there still being plenty of lefties still posting and political disagreement in general happening back and forth.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
To your credit though, I do consider you the "least worst" out of that group of people.
Right? It's weird.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
So for the sake of sanity I'll drop this here. Chalk it up to a win for you, I guess. Gratsky.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Fox News’ senior judicial analyst Judge Napolitano joined ABC News chief legal analyst Dan Abrams on his SiriusXM radio show Wednesday to discuss the Michael Flynn sentencing memo that outlined the short-lived national security adviser’s cooperation with the Robert Mueller investigation. During the interview, Napolitano said he believes someone in the president’s inner circle will soon be indicted. “I don’t know who,” Napolitano added. “But I do know that Donald Jr. has told friends he expects to be indicted.” When asked whether he expects Donald Jr. to be indicted, Napolitano replied: “Yes.” He also suggested there could be a connection between the Mueller investigation and the recent Deutsche Bank raid, before saying “the president himself should be extremely uncomfortable about this.”
I am not homophobic, I just don't like you because you are a useless sack of shit. So, is it on the meds and posting or off the meds and posting?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
It's bad when far Leftist magazines are calling out the issues with the Mueller investigation.
Quote:
Mueller’s comportment suggests a man who’s fallen prey to the same state of mind that warped Ken Starr—namely disgust over the people you’re investigating and a desire to justify the sunk capital. Even if the special counsel presents one hell of a report, Democrats must ask: was it worth it?
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018...ler-skepticismQuote:
Certainly, Trump’s ethical standards are low, but if sleaziness were a crime then many more people from our ruling class would be in jail. It is sleazy, but not criminal, to try to find out in advance what WikiLeaks has on Hillary Clinton. It is sleazy, but not criminal, to take a meeting in Trump Tower with a Russian lawyer promising a dossier of dirt on Clinton. (Just as, it should be mentioned, it is sleazy, but not criminal, to pay a guy to go to Russia to put together a dossier of dirt on Trump. This is one reason why the Clinton campaign lied about its connection to the Steele dossier, albeit without the disadvantage of being under oath.) It is sleazy, but not criminal, to pursue a business deal while you’re running for president. Mueller has nailed people for trying to prevaricate about their sleaze, so we already have a couple of guilty pleas over perjury, with more believed to be on the way. But the purpose of the investigation was to address suspicions of underlying conspiracy—that is, a plan by Trump staffers to get Russian help on a criminal effort. Despite countless man-hours of digging, this conspiracy theory, the one that’s been paying the bills at Maddow for a couple of years now, has come no closer to being borne out. (Or, as the true believers would say, at least not yet.)
Partisanship is hostile to introspection, but at some point maybe we’ll look back and think again about what was unleashed in the panic over Russian influence. Trump’s White House has pursued what is arguably the harshest set of policies toward Russia since the fall of Communism—hardly something to celebrate—yet nearly all the pressure, from the center-left as much as the right, is toward making it even tougher. As for those tapping along to S.N.L. songs in praise of Mueller and his indictments, they might want to remember that Trump won’t always be in office. The weapons you create for your side today will be used by the other side against you tomorrow. Do we really want the special-counsel investigation to become a staple of presidential life? It’s a creation with few boundaries on scope and a setup that encourages the selection of a suspect followed by a search for the crime, rather than the other way around. This caused calamities in the era of Bill Clinton, and it doesn’t get any better just because the partisan dynamics are reversed.
"I'm not homophobic, I just [made shit up relating only to sexuality, not based on anything you've ever said]."Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~
Yes, very convincing, Rocktar. Did you hallucinate what you were responding to? Or are you just, as I claimed, a shitty, homophobic parody of a conservative? Tell us more about how InfoWars is a reputable source of information.
Amazing how that works.Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
BTW time4sharts hasn't posted in this thread ever since she was called out for sharts.
Why are you so emotional?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Stfu homo.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
It might not be because you are a fag that most people can't stand you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Just sayin...
Yeah, it's just a totally random, weird coincidence that your consistent angle of attack is based on sexuality, and that and resentment and dislike for LGBTs is a conservative stereotype.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Or maybe he just knows what triggers you and makes the most of it. It's not exactly a new trolling tactic. It even predates the internet entirely.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Or maybe he just knows what triggers you and makes the most of it. It's not exactly a new trolling tactic. It even predates the internet entirely.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Kind of like how being triggered over just about everything is a liberal stereotype.Quote:
and that and resentment and dislike for LGBTs is a conservative stereotype.
Stop acting like a dramatic little victimized faggot and people would probably give you a chance.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
You (the collective "you") are the one whining about being called out for being homophobic. Come up with insults other than ones based on sexuality and, surprise surprise, you won't be called out for being homophobic.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
But you, in particular, have a decade+ established history of sending people virulently anti-gay messages. Which you've still done obsessively -- at least, to me -- during long lulls in my posting, so your nonsensical "stop acting like (X) and I'll stop" is unconvincing.
Me calling you a fag is the same as you calling me old. You don't hear me crying about it in EVERY.FUCKING.POST.EVERY.FUCKING.DAY.IN.EVERY.FUCKING.THREADQuote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
I get it.. you aren't used to not playing the victim. You have to have something to blame your shitty life on.
And I thought all those red rep comments were sexualized messages... and now they are virulent anti-gay messages?
But, you don't have a problem sending 'virulent anti-age' messages.....
Seriously, it's like you are challenging time4fun for the least self aware on the message board.
ur gayQuote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Democrats taking control of the U.S. House of Representatives in January plan to send Special Counsel Robert Mueller the transcripts of testimony by some of President Donald Trump’s closest associates so they can be reviewed for evidence and possible falsehoods, said three sources familiar with the matter.
Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, son Donald Trump Jr, former advisers Roger Stone and Corey Lewandowski, personal aide Rhona Graff and former personal aides Hope Hicks and Keith Schiller all testified before the House Intelligence Committee while it was under control of its outgoing Republican majority.
The sources said the transcripts of those interviews will be among those sent to Mueller’s team, which is investigating Russia’s alleged interference in the 2016 presidential election and possible collusion by Trump’s campaign team.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...rce=reddit.com
Shut up ya snowflake.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Be sure to let me know how insensitive I am and how this insult has scarred you for life.
Ashliana doing his part to help destroy the word "homophobic" forever. Good job. Just like it means nothing to be called a racist now since you far left morons use it to mean someone you disagree with.
The sooner this clown is out the better. He's killing the economy, increasing crime, setting us back 100 years, and making an ass out of himself and America. And thats just the short list of his incompetence!
Impeach!
I see you got all of your CNN talking points memorized.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
tr;drQuote:
Originally Posted by Back
How is he killing the economy?Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Seems to me that he's the first president we've had in decades that has the backbone to stand up against China. It's sad to watch people that virtue signal all day long about the poor and yet are unwilling to do what it takes to improve the lives of the poor because they don't want to pay for American manufactured products.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
https://media.giphy.com/media/xUOxfg...xpUA/giphy.gif
Trump is a con man, swindler, liar, and a cheat. His greatest marks are the people of the Republican party.
So basically, every politician ever?Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Can you name another politician in recent years that has been as absurd and scandal plagued as Trump is?Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
Uh, no. 1) You've hurled anti-gay epithets at me about 10,000x more times than I've called you "old." 2) Those two things aren't even remotely on the same level (You didn't think that one through, did you? But you never think anything through, so that's just you being you). And 3) Criticizing someone for their tired, predictable use of homophobia isn't "crying about it." There's a common element here, which you're conveniently ignoring -- your (and the other trolls on here's) constant reliance on homophobic insults. Much to your obvious dismay, you (and they) didn't get criticized for mentioning something totally unrelated to... ding, ding, ding, homophobia.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
... you said in the same post you literally whined about someone calling you old and tried to equivocate them with your 10-year plus screed of furious, sexualized, anti-gay messages. Without a shred of self-awareness, you're relishing in what is probably your first opportunity to claim to be "victimized." Oh no! The meanie-head gay guy called me old after I insulted him on the basis of sexuality hundreds of times! My mentally ill obsession with gay men is now somehow justified because he called me old, long after the fact! The horror!Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Those two descriptions aren't mutually exclusive. You are an imbecile.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
You're so right. "Virulently" anti-age messages. You should complain to the local human rights organization.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Uh, yeah. You'd be right.... if you literally discounted everything I'd actually pointed out is homophobic, as if they hadn't said it. But we've been over this.. Your refusal or inability to read only reflects only you, dude.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Is that based on facts with or without the protections and coverups of the media? Or do you want to go on pure absurd acts that are hugely anti-American and destructive over all regardless of media protection? And lastly, no matter who says what, you are going to want to discount sources, claim whataboutism or simply dismiss facts because there hasn't been a conviction.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
subpoena subpoena
And you are a dumbass, an idiot, a biggot and a racist. Your greatest crime is being intentionally and wantonly ignorant.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Hillary ClintonQuote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Jesus... you so triggered.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Stop being so... butthurt.
https://media.tenor.com/images/8a647...7d6c/tenor.gif
2018 Androidpk probably won't agree with this.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
2016 Androidpk will though.
It's almost like you couldn't come up with a response to anything I said, conceding once again. Tell me more about which virulently anti-age insults hurt your fee-fees.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Sorry.. I didn't read it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Honestly, it was probably a copy/paste of the same old tired bullshit you always post. Let me guess:
"I'm Gay and you hurt my fee fees!"
"You were hitting on me calling me a cocksucking fag!"
"You old fucking alzheimers bully! You're old!"
"I know Keiphre would agree with me too!"
"I don't use alt accounts now..."
"H-O-M-O-P-H-O-B-E!"
"I get so triggered when the conversation is queer"
"Have I mentioned I really believe I'm some sort of special class because I like to puff peters?"
SPOILER: You aren't despised because you're a faggot.. you're despised because you are flaming drama queen pretending to be something you are not in hopes you can finally find love.
https://media0.giphy.com/media/a3zqv...7945592ee0b6b7Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Translation: "You mean you respond similarly to the identical BS I spew and insult I make every thread? You're so predictable!"Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
There's a reason why you freak out in every thread that isn't just a right-wing circlejerk. It's the same reason you're forced to resort, time after time, to insults -- usually homophobic -- in every thread you face uncomfortable facts or developments -- you're a comically inept, uneducated old man terrified of a changing world.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
The reason you're so intensely butthurt -- to the point where you've literally left me more than a hundred sexual raging messages you thought were anonymous -- is that I can substantiate what I'm saying about you. Your mental illness was exposed for all to see and is a matter of public record.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Your claim here, on the other hand, is based on a complete fantasy you concocted.
"Pretending to be something you are not in hopes you can finally find love"? Okay, that's your claim.
Aaaaand your evidence? Oh. Parkbandit's claims don't have evidence, do they? Best of luck affording the psychiatric care you so desperately need after you skulk out of the thread again.
Ashliana, one of the most mean spirited and ill-tempered people on the PC, is giving a lecture to others about being mean spirited and ill-tempered.
And who is worse?Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
Hillary Clinton. Benghazi.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Yeah, ashliana should try to be more decent like you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
You're retardedQuote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
Nice answer. Trump isnt involved on any scandals that involve an Ambassador and American Citizens being killed. Your answer in rebuttal is "You're retarded"Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
NOU!Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
You made me spit out my coke there. That might be the first time you've made me laugh, Dreaven.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Interesting, interesting. And what do you have to say about even the GOP-led House Intelligence Committee being forced to conclude, after wasting millions of taxpayer dollars and multiple years of "investigating," that no wrongdoing on the part of the Obama administration occurred -- including Clinton? And it debunks pretty much every right-wing hypothesis about what happened. For some totally unrelated reason, the GOP released that report with almost no press and right before Thanksgiving. What a weird coincidence that you're sitting here saying "Benghazi" as a single statement, as if it somehow demonstrates Hillary's supposed scandalous nature.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
Uh... yes, yes, he is. What a surprise that you don't know about it, considering the left didn't politicize it in the same way that the right politicized Benghazi. Not an ambassador, but definitely American citizens.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
I'd love to hear you articulate what, precisely, you think Hillary did or didn't do RE: Benghazi, especially compared to how, say, Reagan responded to the murder of 241 soldiers in the Beirut barracks bombing. Hint: It was a total withdrawal of US forces with basically no retaliation or response. I wonder what the right would've done to Obama if he'd done that. Oh well.
Republicans investigated that for how many years? How many people got indicted? You're retarded.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
Hearing the truth makes Ashliana laugh.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
If only you had the power to twist reality to suit your fantasies. Not in this universe, sadly. Or would you care to back up the assertion? No? Oh. Okay.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Backup my assertions that you are one of the most mean spirited and ill-tempered people on the PC? Sure. I can do that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Click for proof.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_asNhzXq72wQuote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Thanks for playing, Dreaven.
Funny, wanna recall your entire post history on it?Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Androidpk now defending Hillary's and Obama's failure in regards to Benghazi? This 2018 model of Androidpk is kind of sad and pathetic.
I wonder if the 2019 model of Androidpk will defend Hillary's handling of classified information.
Who cares anymore? Trump is your President. 2020, I'm betting Trump will will be your President again. Dude has been doing exactly as he said he was going to do.
No, I'm asking you, how many people were indicted over Benghazi? Did you even read the Republican report?Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
Asking how many people were indicted is defending them? 2018 Tgo is just as sad and pathetic as every other year Tgo.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
This is correct. Although I am rather disappointed about the wall not being done. Seems the chances of that happening are nil now that retarded liberals take over the house next month. :(Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
You're a stupid dumb stupiddumbhead.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
And you're dumb too.
At least you have enough sense to not say he should be more decent like you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Please stop with the irony. It's too ironic for 8:40am CST on a Friday.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
In beforeQuote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
https://media.giphy.com/media/6qoZdlNvxB64E/giphy.gif
Hook, line, and sinker. Trump sure got what he wanted though. :bigsmile:Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrathbringer
https://static.fjcdn.com/gifs/Broken_73c1b6_5375577.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by Back
When did drunk Tuesday move to drunk Friday though?
Your Baghdad Bob impressions is very nice.Quote:
Originally Posted by Koars Light
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FopyRHHlt3MQuote:
Originally Posted by Koars Light
Yeah, all those guilty pleas are nothing. You must be a foxnews fan.Quote:
Originally Posted by Koars Light
President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, John Kelly, has been questioned by special counsel Robert Mueller’s team of investigators as part of a probe into potential obstruction of justice, a new report says.
CNN reported Friday that Kelly, who reportedly is on the verge of leaving the White House, answered a “narrow set of questions” from Mueller’s investigators.
That sit-down came after White House lawyers first objected to Kelly being interviewed.
CNN reported: “The Mueller questions to Kelly centered on a narrow set of issues in the investigation of potential obstruction of justice, chiefly Kelly’s recollection of an episode that took place after new reporting emerged about how the President had tried to fire Mueller.”
OMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMg GUYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111111 11111111111!1!!! THIS IS REALLY REALLY REALLY IT THIS TIME FOR REAL!!!!!!!!!!!11 IT'S ACTUALLY GOING TO START HEATING UP NOW!!!!!!!!!!!111111111 I MEAN IT IT'S HAPPENING!!!!!!1Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
NOU!Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Come back to reality.Quote:
Originally Posted by Koars Light
Feds recommend 42 months in prison for Trump's former lawyer/business parter Michael Cohen.
Country club federal time.
Doesn't Cohen, Manafort, and Flynn being sentenced point to no more indictments coming out of their testimony? Wouldn't they wait until after all indictments have been resolved first to ensure they can count on their testimony if needed in court?
Why is everyone saying this is bad news from Trump? If anything it shows the investigation is winding down with no new indictments coming down the line and so far they have gotten people for lying, for shit that happened years before the 2016 election, and a bunch of Russians who will never stand trial.
The 2016 model of Androidpk used to point out Bill Clinton's rides on that plane all of the time. The 2018 model wants to give Bill Clinton rides.Quote:
Originally Posted by Koars Light
Cohen sentenging memo - https://assets.documentcloud.org/doc...Submission.pdf
Manafort breach memo - https://assets.documentcloud.org/doc...ion-Breach.pdf
Trump is absolutely correct. Nothing in the two memos filed today says that Trump did anything wrong. I'll tell you who's in trouble.. "Individual 1," whoever that is. That guy is going to the hooskow for sure.
Federal prosecutors have concluded that Trump, aka Individual 1, has committed a felony. :)
Androidpk has been watching MSNBC I see.
This is per federal prosecutors in SDNY, not MSNBC.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
President Trump should certainly consider pardons for whomever this yet to be indicted felon "Individual 1" is. Sounds like too many close associates are being sentenced for serious campaign finance and ethics violations.
It is also very important ignore the name "Trump" when one considers Russian offers to grant massive concessions for a hotel which would just so happen to bear your name. I'm sure Cohen and Manafort were negotiating at the direct request of some other guy named Donald Trump.
Please quote the exact part where "federal prosecutors have concluded that Trump has committed a felony."Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
In before Trump says Individual 1 is George Soros.
Delusion.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
So nowhere? Thought so.Quote:
Originally Posted by SHAFT
Was this post short enough for you?
Quote:
Originally Posted by SHAFT
It's like I'm psychic or something.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
I know SHAFT posted this but at this point Androidpk and SHAFT seem interchangeable.
More than that. Mueller is telling us that Trump and his campaign colluded with Russia to influence the Presidential election in exchange for financial incentives.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Better yet.. criticizing me for calling him a fag because I say that to 'him' all the time.. and in the same breath, calls me old.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
That peter puffer has zero self awareness.
Androidpk2016: "She's going to get indicted any day now! My sources have told me!!"Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk2018
You've got nothing better than Rachel Maddow's twitter blog?Quote:
Originally Posted by SHAFT
Oh honey...
FTFY Honey...Quote:
Originally Posted by time4fun
In her mind he's been guilty of that since day 1.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
And day 1 = 11/9/16.. before this Hillary lost because Russia excuse was invented.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashlander
Over of the course of more than a decade, you spent untold hours of your life leaving other men furious, sexualized messages anonymously on the Internet. You can sit here pretending that all you said to people was "fag," except your mentally ill screeds are a matter of public record.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
You can claim that someone calling you old -- 1/1,000th as many times as you impotently raged -- somehow rationalizes your behavior, again, ignoring the fact that you obsessively cycled your rep, leaving as many messages per day as the system would allow, to let you continue to spew your fantasies at people. People who hadn't posted in months.
You desperately need psychiatric care.
Let me spell this out for you in terms you'll understand:Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashlander
Bob Mueller is a Federal Prosecutor in the DoJ who is investigating a sitting US President. There is one rule above all others that any Federal Prosecutor in his position must abide by: You do NOT under any circumstances make public statements or filings that in any way, shape, or form would lead the public to suspect the current sitting US President of having broken the law unless you are 100% certain that they did. And Mueller is the DoJ's most ardent boy scout- he follows the rules to the letter. (particularily in this situation)
Add to that the fact that this investigation involves the most serious allegations any modern US President has faced, and it's even more true than usual. The damage that unnecessary doubt and suspicion would do to the office of the President, the President's ability to effectively lead the country, and the sense of stability this country relies on to keep going is immeasurable.
Mueller has been progressively painting the picture of what happened in the 2016 election very carefully and deliberately. And his most recent filings have been connecting all of the dots in ways that clearly indicate that all roads lead to the President. Every word in these filings is precise and strategic. And both Trump and Trump's campaign were mentioned repeatedly in the filings in lieu of less accusatory language like "US citizens" or "major political campaign".
I doubt any of you are going to bother reading these filings or the previous ones, but I suggest you start coming up with your cognitive dissonance strategies now so you can explain away how blind and deluded you have been for the past two years.
That too!Quote:
Originally Posted by time4fun
"Dude", stop.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
No one cares... well, except you.
Which makes it hilarious.
The only one of us who needs psychiatric care is you. I'm not using the Internet to escape reality because reality kicked you straight in the face... forcing you to pretend to be anything or anyone but what you really are.
Also, you keep pretending that I've somehow denied any of the red rep comments I gave you. SPOILER: I haven't.
I'm very content that my red rep comments to you have done exactly I said they would: Make you go absolutely batshit triggered.
I'd apologize for them.. but they are still 100% true :(
I'd ask your pegfriend to actually post a specific instance where he said "trump and his campaign colluded with Russia to influence the Presidential election in exchange for financial incentives", but we both know she can't, won't and doesn't care about the actual reality.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Mueller and Comey hasn't fucked up an investigation this badly since the 2001 anthrax fiasco.
So a few things:Quote:
Originally Posted by Koars Light
1) The notion that Trump is only guilty if convicted by the Senate is abjectly false. You're worrying about the wrong definition of "guilty" at this point. You should be a hell of a let more concerned with the fact that a sitting US President coordinated with our greatest geopolitical enemy to attack our democracy in exchange for a business deal, and that he spent the last several years trying to convince the entire country that there was no attack. If we, as a country can't all agree this is serious and appalling- then there's not a lot of hope for us.
2) The notion that Trump is untouchable is also abjectly false. There is a DoJ guidance that a sitting President can't be criminally indicted on Federal crimes, that's true. But that guidance exists (or not) based on the discretion of the AG (or acting AG in the case of a recusal)- so it's not set in stone. We're looking at some VERY serious charges- this is treason in the non-juridical sense of the term.
But even if Whitaker isn't recused (we don't actually know) and/or refuses to allow the DoJ to indict Trump while he's in office- the State of New York can do it and easily. And there are many ways to go after Trump that don't involve incarceration (hint: his financial interests). Finally, even if Trump manages to finish out his term (which is an increasingly questionable proposition), he's only sitting on 2 years of immunity from Federal indictment at most. A lot of the crimes committed were before his time as President, and the only protection he has after leaving office is the statute of limitations.
3) Your "just another dumb black guy" comment was completely inappropriate, and you know it.
4) Yes, Mueller is going after Trump's kids. That was hinted at so strongly in the filings that it may as well have been explicitly stated. But if you're thinking Trump is going to fall on his sword for them, I'd think again. It's possible a deal will be cut ala Nixon, but honestly- these crimes are serious enough to question whether or not that outcome is even feasible at this point.
I'm still waiting for her and Taernath to finish up that conversation about moobs or whatever the fuck it was.
And I'm waiting for you all to admit how incredibly wrong you've been for the last two years about this entire investigation and the coordination between Trump and Russia.Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
So I gotta wait 2 years for the thrilling conclusion of 'suck my tits, little child, trust me I'm an adult male'?Quote:
Originally Posted by time4fun
You tease.
The conversation is more or less finished. She was wrong and knows it, but can't admit to it. She is the superego, y'know.Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
Oh, well, damn. Thanks for the spoiler!Quote:
Originally Posted by Taernath
Yet.. so far, we've been spot on and you've been the one that has been wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by time4fun
Not that you would get that from MSNBC though.. so you probably just don't know this yet.
I can't wait when you find out though.. the epic meltdown will be delicious.
The only thing that will be more satisfying will be a Trump re-election.
There's literally nothing super about her though.. unless she comes back and says she used to work for Marvel or DC as a consultant.Quote:
Originally Posted by Taernath
:rofl: Your insults are based on fantasy, whereas mine are based on your established history of mental illness. You're triggered as shit because absolutely nothing you can say here changes the public record of your actions, and you have absolutely no evidence to back up your insults. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Best of luck trying again, though.
Much like above, you simply claiming something doesn't make it true. How many times have you and the other conservatives on here gone "HURR THIS THING'S REALLY WARMING UP NOW" - 5 of the president's allies who were part of his campaign are now convicted felons. The sentencing memo of one of them just directly implicated Trump in at least two felonies. The president's own son is expecting to be indicted. Even Fox News is calling it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
You entirely rely on magical thinking -- just like Trump. Will you shed tears of impotent rage when justice is served?
Sure, just show me where Mueller said anything you claim he said and the show the proof Mueller has.Quote:
Originally Posted by time4fun
I heard you're gay.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Oh look, she crawled out of her hole.Quote:
Originally Posted by time4fun
She was wrong, crawled back into her hole in the hopes that it would die down and then began her toxicity again.Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
She has a PhD in Marvel AND DC comics oh and she is also a super hero. She got her powers during 9/11.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
I couldn't help but laugh at this one. I'm not sure what "conversation" you think we had, but given that I've spent the last month or so transitioning to a new role at work- effectively working two jobs- I've barely been sleeping- let alone visiting PC. I've dropped in maybe once a week. So apparently you've been having a one sided conversation with yourself and giving yourself imaginary rhetorical points over it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Taernath
Which is...bleak to say the least. But also exactly what I would expect out of you.
LOLQuote:
Originally Posted by time4fun
"You didn't win, I don't remember!"
I see Tgo has enrolled another student in his School of Reading Incomprehension
Are you sure you don't remember a discussion about pygmy males? I do. As do several other people.Quote:
Originally Posted by time4fun
Seriously. I gotta say that's one of the more bizarre deflections I've seen around here. 'The debate we were having a few pages ago was entirely in your mind and not seen by and quoted by everyone involved'. It's almost falling off your scooter and losing your memory tier. Maybe she should get her carbon monoxide detectors checked.Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
Congrats on your totally real and not made up 'new role' though, time4fun. I can't wait for the big reveal that you're Mueller's on-call Feminist Anthropology adviser or something.
https://media.giphy.com/media/3oEduX...PJLO/giphy.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by time4fun
Seriously, we already have a "NOU" guy.. that's Androidpk.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
You're upset about the red rep... and I got the exact reaction I knew I would get from someone like you.
But keep pretending you aren't.. over and over and over again.. it's even better than your first triggering.
I don't cry over politics, It. I laugh at people like you who do.Quote:
Much like above, you simply claiming something doesn't make it true. How many times have you and the other conservatives on here gone "HURR THIS THING'S REALLY WARMING UP NOW" - 5 of the president's allies who were part of his campaign are now convicted felons. The sentencing memo of one of them just directly implicated Trump in at least two felonies. The president's own son is expecting to be indicted. Even Fox News is calling it.
You entirely rely on magical thinking -- just like Trump. Will you shed tears of impotent rage when justice is served?
Will you cry your impotent rage when justice is served and Trump goes on to win re-election?
Wasn't the conversation was about you believing men are lactating to breastfeed children as a common practice for pygmies. You know.. the one you googled to "prove" your anthropology degree.. and also.. strangely enough... the first return on a Google search?Quote:
Originally Posted by time4fun
Only to backtrack later on when you found out how utterly retarded you are?
Then you suddenly "got busy at work" right when you were getting shit on for being so fucking retarded?
https://media0.giphy.com/media/11nloJQzzDP1MA/200w.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by Taernath
This is what you tell yourself in order to (ineptly) try rationalizing your behavior. Everybody knows you're a raging sociopath, obsessed with gay men, PB. Perhaps you should re-read that thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
You clearly cry over politics. You were screaming like a little baby right before Obama won re-election, hysterically crying about how you were taking solace in the nutcase that was "unskewing" the polls. You continue to be "confused" about why Trump's Dept. of Justice hasn't indicted Hillary, and yet 5 of Trump's inner circle are now convicted felons, with his son likely to follow. And that's the tip of the iceberg.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
That sounds like projection there champ.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
There is nothing about you that is obsession worthy. You literally have to pretend to be something you are not. Hell, even YOU find yourself boring as fuck.
Again.. you're projecting. You have no control over your delicate emotions and just assume other people have that same defect.Quote:
You clearly cry over politics. You were screaming like a little baby right before Obama won re-election, hysterically crying about how you were taking solace in the nutcase that was "unskewing" the polls. You continue to be "confused" about why Trump's Dept. of Justice hasn't indicted Hillary, and yet 5 of Trump's inner circle are now convicted felons, with his son likely to follow. And that's the tip of the iceberg.
Sorry.. we're normal.. something you know nothing about.
Wait.. before you go.. can you tell us all again how not upset you are about red rep?
It's hilarious.
Sounds like you don't know what projection is. :) And you spent a decade obsessively cycling your rep to leave furious, sexualized messages anonymously to myself and several other men. What drove you to do so -- how you rationalize your behavior -- is your problem, your mental illness, to confront, regardless of whether there was anything "obsession worthy" to actually justify your obsession.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
... as you, without a shred of self-awareness or shame, pretend that I've ever done so. Spoiler Alert: There's a reason you've never been able to substantiate your claim. Because your position has no evidence -- a common theme for you as a conservative, as you're a poorly educated, 65 year old hot tub installer from the boondocks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
:rofl: Now that's projection for you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
You seem to really struggle with the reality that your past statements are a publicly visible record of your behavior. Is it that you don't understand how the Internet works?Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
As a man in your 50's, you spent countless untold hours over the course of a decade sending other men furious, sexualized messages anonymously on the Internet. You are anything but "normal." You desperately need intensive psychiatric care.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
At least you've given up trying to say red rep doesn't upset you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
It's a start!
Also: I never get tired of you trying to insult a guy by implying he's gay. Is that the straight girl in your head talking.. or the gay guy?
Former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie (R) said Sunday that the language federal prosecutors are using to refer to President Trump in an indictment against Michael Cohen makes it sound as if they might have corroborating evidence that the president violated campaign finance law.
"The language in the sentencing memo is different from what we've heard before," Christie told ABC's "This Week," noting that Trump's former attorney Cohen has previously said he violated campaign finance law at the president's direction. "The only thing that would concern me if I was the president's team this morning about this sentencing memo is the language."
"The language sounds very definite," Christie said. "And what I'd be concerned about is, what corroboration do they have?"
https://thehill.com/homenews/sunday-...ce-trump-cohen
Many GOP leaders and politicians have started to question whether President Donald Trump will serve out his entire term, conservative commentator David Brooks has said.
The right-leaning pundit, who is currently a columnist for The New York Times, pointed out that there is growing uncertainty among Republicans over Trump’s future during an interview with PBS News Hour . Brooks explained that politician’s from the president’s party have started to see his administration as losing “authority” and “failing.”
Appearing alongside liberal political commentator Mark Shields, Brooks said it seems like “a lot of Republicans are looking at this White House, and they’re seeing an administration under a lot of judicial and legal threat and a lot under political threat.”
https://www.newsweek.com/lot-republi...h-term-1251056
Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) on Sunday said that President Trump might "face the real prospect of jail time" after prosecutors indicated last week that he directed illegal payments during his 2016 presidential campaign.
"There’s a very real prospect that on the day Donald Trump leaves office, the Justice Department may indict him. That he may be the first president in quite some time to face the real prospect of jail time," he said on CBS's "Face the Nation."
https://thehill.com/homenews/sunday-...t-of-jail-time
Even Fox News is jumping on board :lol:
The major takeaway from the 40-page sentencing memorandum filed by federal prosecutors Friday for Michael Cohen, President Trump’s former personal attorney, is this: The president is very likely to be indicted on a charge of violating federal campaign finance laws.
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/andr...an-us-attorney
It's funny to hear Chris "shut down the bridge" "My beach front property" Christie talking about criminal evidence.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Even funnier is listening to Republicans pretend they ever had a spine to begin with.
Why isn't Adam Schiff calling out Bernie Sanders for breaking campaign finance laws?
What I promise that we will see is Democrats suckling on any Democrat, whether that be a fake indian woman or a woman beating porno lawyer.
rofl, violating campaign finance laws is a civil penalty. Obama did it too.
So, no collusion and the worst thing Trump would have to do is pay a fine?Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
OMG YOU DID IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It's funny watching far left dimwits such as Androidpk go from a 2+ year long rant of "Collusion! Russia! Russian collusion! I know it! Lock him up!"
To "Campaign finance violations! I just knew Mueller would find SOMETHING!"
And they're okay with this. They're okay with a runaway rogue "special" prosecutor just finding anything at all to stick to Trump. If not Russian collusion why not something else? And since they have exactly zero shame anymore these days they don't even care what a piece of shit they look like.
The far left's strategy: Just make something up about Trump/Republicans that make them look bad, if proven wrong just pretend you never said that and move on to the next complete lie. Oh yeah and while doing all of this state multiple times that you care about facts and rule of law.
I think the sheer shock of Hillary losing is what drove people over the edge. He wasn't suppose to win.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
The only thing raising questions about your sexuality are your actions, buddy. Most men don't spend a decade of their lives -- starting in their 50's -- sending other men furious, sexualized imagery they spent untold hours of their lives cooking up. What drove you to do so is your own issue.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Collusion's already been established... more than a year ago. Have you been hysterically cowering away from the news? Or is your memory shot?Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Why do you hate old people?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
You are STILL SO UPSET!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
You've literally spent 10 years on this message board being so upset.. because of red reputation comments.
Time well spent by me.
Thank you for entertaining me.
Hey, do us all a favor and tell us again how you don't care about red rep again.... for the 10000000000th time.... all the while hoping someone is somehow hitting on you.
Sad!
So, collusion has already been established for over a year now.. yet Trump is still our President.Quote:
Collusion's already been established... more than a year ago. Have you been hysterically cowering away from the news? Or is your memory shot?
You're so fucking retarded.
He doesn't. Obviously he has some sexual fantasy about old men... otherwise, why would he spend a decade of his life, sending me red rep comments about how old I am?Quote:
Originally Posted by Fortybox
And it upsets him so much that the desire isn't returned at all.
Sorry.. I'm not into some freakish sugar daddy fetish with a pretend girl.
If Trump did violate some campaign finance laws, he should be held accountable.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Do what Obama did.. pay the fine and be done with it.
Mueller and SDNY are not the same.. leave it to the trolls with zero reading comprehension to think they're one and the same and that this means Trump is innocent of conspiracy.. :lol:
Talk about splitting hairs. Like the two aren't working side by side and sharing information.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Also since you're going by the SDNY filing, didn't they suggest Cohen wasn't very cooperative with them and thus they recommended pretty much the maximum amount of jail time? Doesn't sound like a very cooperative witness who is going to bend over backwards to help their cause to bring down the president.
Maybe it's time you put down the MSNBC fanfic.
No, it isn't splitting hairs, it's apples and oranges. Your ignorance of the subject is not a surprise though.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
I'm afraid pointing out your ten-year obsession -- as a 50 year old -- with sending other men furious, sexualized messages full of your trademarked impotent rage doesn't constitute other people being upset by your obsession. People weren't angry with you as a result of that thread. They felt sorry for you, that you'd been on this earth for 65+ years and had somehow escaped the psychiatric care you so clearly need.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
The comments you chose to obsessively send to other men anonymously on the Internet may have been of a sexual nature, but that doesn't mean anybody's claimed you were "hitting on them." Your reading comprehension is off-the-charts poor, so nobody's surprised you made that error.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Five of the president's campaign members are now convicted felons for repeated lying to the Special Counsel regarding Russia. Trump's been exposed as conspiring with Russia in exchange for a Trump Tower deal, after flatly denying all deals with Russia.. hundreds of times.. over the course of multiple years. Specifically, duping people like you eager to accept and reguritate anything he says. Even Fox News is expecting the president to be indicted as you sit here claiming "HURR All's well in Trumpland!"Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
:rofl: You sound pretty upset. No surprise there, though - you've embarrassed yourself how many times now?Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Sounds like the GOP needs to up its investigation game. This is what happens when one side plays too nice.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Sounds like you don't know what you're talking about. The GOP frantically investigated Democrats. Despite that, they couldn't come up with anything. Do you not remember the multiple years of Benghazi investigations that resulted in GOP-written reports clearing the Obama administration of wrongdoing?Quote:
Originally Posted by Fortybox
Pepperidge Farm remembers.
Incidentally, that chart is incorrect. Gen. Petraeus, a Republican who Obama nominated to run the CIA, was convicted of giving classified to the reporter he was sleeping with. There should be at least 1 in that chart.
I was thinking you'd say ZOMG@!im not old!!111Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
https://media.giphy.com/media/DWo6beGJTTqFi/giphy.gif
Duh...that's why it needs to up its investigation game. Can't you read?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Also, it's PK - don't take any number he gives as facts.