About those LA fires?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tgo01

lol

The entire neighborhood burned to the ground, in large part because the government of California sucks at not turning California into a giant tinder box and because they couldn't keep enough water to fight the fires, but yeah sure, let's be sure we do an "environmental" impact study and make sure we aren't annoying our neighbor's lot filled with burned ruble.

---

The regulations are in place to protect you and me from careless or heartless builders who would poison our blood with asbestos and other cheap building materials. The regulations allow for safe homes for people to live in that won't fall apart if someone leans on the wrong support beam. Regulations ensure that the electricity and gas lines are all connected correctly so that there are no fatal tragedies.

Plus that fire was a tragedy dude. It wasn't negligence, it wasn't a purposeful blaze to evict citizens from beachfront property, that's fucking heartless batshit crazy fiction.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Back

The regulations are in place to protect you and me from careless or heartless builders who would poison our blood with asbestos and other cheap building materials. The regulations allow for safe homes for people to live in that won't fall apart if someone leans on the wrong support beam. Regulations ensure that the electricity and gas lines are all connected correctly so that there are no fatal tragedies.

---

You know damn well none of that has anything to do with an environmental impact study. Or maybe you don't.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Back

Plus that fire was a tragedy dude. It wasn't negligence, it wasn't a purposeful blaze to evict citizens from beachfront property, that's fucking heartless batshit crazy fiction.

---

I didn't say the fire itself was negligence. Try to keep up. I said California not doing a better job of clearing brush and dead vegetation and not ensuring there is enough water for firefighters to fight fires with was negligence.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Back

Your graphic is incorrect. The bill is actually SB 658.

SB 663 extends property tax deadlines for rebuilding.

I don't know where the info is coming from for whoever made that graphic but it seems to be totally incorrect. Just another lie to get you mad and keep voting for the elites.

---

Surprise Back, you are wrong. California SB 658 is NOT the bill being discussed in the graphic. The graphic is correct and is referencing the correct law, SB 549.

So here is the follow up from the person that made the graphic:

Quote:

---

The Hills Actor Spencer Pratt who lost his home in the Pacific Palisades fire put New LA legislation Democrats passed onto Grok 4 Heavy to understand it

“California senate has passed SB549 granting LA county AUTHORITY TO PURCHASE FIRE DESTROYED LOTS FOR MINIMAL COST”

“Directly contradicting Mr. Gavin Newsom's previous assurance to homeowners that such government driven property conversions wouldn't happen. It enables cities and counties to allocate property taxes to infrastructure districts from January 2026 mandating 40% affordable housing.

— It authorizes LA county to create a resilient rebuilding authority — It strips local control, creates a county authority that overrides city community decisions on rebuilding after the wildfires, centralizing power away from locals. An example the Pacific Palisades Input ignored enables rezoning without input allows rezoning for resilient. That's what it's called projects like infill housing transit without full resident approval displacement risk authority can buy land back”

“The people that are in charge of this bill, they're the people in charge of letting the whole town burn down.”

---

So, given the gross incompetence, maleficence and possible intentional malevolence in combination with this law, it is starting to look more and more intentional, if not the fire, the intent to steal people's land to advance the narrative while most likely profiting immensely after the fire.

So fuck off and I hope the citizens sue the fuck out of the county and state for the permitting BS and for this blatant, criminal and unconstitutional land grab.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Back

If Los Angeles buys property it can protect the neighborhood by what is built there. Rather than having billionaires snatch up all the properties for condos to rent out to the bourgeoisie who are chasing the American dream or high rent strip malls for dollar stores. What? You think Los Angeles City is buying these properties to turn a hearty profit?

Legal citizens were being taken care of but now with the big bullshit bill vital medical and supplemental food services have been stripped from millions of them to add trillions to the debt and reward the few wealthy individuals who need help the least.

---

Honestly I think the City would be incapable of making a profit (due to incompetence and corruption) on those properties even if that is their intent. But it begs the question…why is this a priority for the city over simply helping the homeowners rebuild? At minimum the city is using this tragic natural disaster to advance their own political cause instead of helping the impacted victims.

Legal citizens that work full time & earn under the 80% local median income threshold, disabled, volunteer 20 hours per week, or those actively seeking employment (and showing proof) will continue to be taken care of. Illegal aliens won’t be. It’s everyone’s tax dollars; not just the ultra rich. I don’t feel the least bit bad about the lazy freeloading leaches of society and illegal aliens loosing taxpayer funded healthcare & food subsidy benefits. That’s not what SNAP & Medicaid was designed for and the American people have spoken.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~

Surprise Back, you are wrong. California SB 658 is NOT the bill being discussed in the graphic. The graphic is correct and is referencing the correct law, SB 549.

So here is the follow up from the person that made the graphic:



So, given the gross incompetence, maleficence and possible intention malevolence in combination with this law, it is starting to look more and more intentional, if not the fire, the intent to steal people's land to advance the narrative while most likely profiting immensely after the fire.

So fuck off and I hope the citizens sue the fuck out of hte county and state for the permitting BS and for this blatant, criminal and unconstitutional land grab.

---

My bad. I looked at the California bill instead of the Los Angeles bill.

Still the whole point is that the city of Los Angeles isn't stealing land homeowners after a disaster so it can build affordable housing. That just doesn't make any sense at all. There's no profit motive, it would only engender distrust, would most likely be illegal in the first place, and it would probably cost more than any benefit.

What it sounds like to me is some white nationalist paranoid BS about replacing the white population with brown people.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Back

What it sounds like to me is some white nationalist paranoid BS about replacing the white population with brown people.

---

Every time, Back. Every time.

I'll be reading one of your posts thinking to myself "Okay this is all pretty dumb, but not too bad." And suddenly BAM! You post something so stupid it boggles the mind.

How do you do it?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Back

What it sounds like to me is some white nationalist paranoid BS about replacing the white population with brown people.

---

Jesus.

That’s the ultimate out for any leftist that realizes they are on the losing side of an argument. Call us racist and end the conversation.

Just answer this Back, from a moral perspective which should the city prioritize:

A) Helping tax-paying property owners impacted by the fire to rebuild and make them whole.

OR

B) Fuck over said property owners and buy the land so they can create low-income housing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Back

My bad. I looked at the California bill instead of the Los Angeles bill.

Still the whole point is that the city of Los Angeles isn't stealing land homeowners after a disaster so it can build affordable housing. That just doesn't make any sense at all. There's no profit motive, it would only engender distrust, would most likely be illegal in the first place, and it would probably cost more than any benefit.

What it sounds like to me is some white nationalist paranoid BS about replacing the white population with brown people.

---

Stealing people's land so you can profit off the corruption in the whole building process, then bringing in a much higher density of low income, low IQ, low effort voters living on the public dole, all so you can retain or expand Leftist power and continue your profiteering off the government nipple through all kinds of "charities" and NGOs AND keep yourself in office. It's a great Leftist trifecta/hat trick of corruption all supported by morons like you because "mah feels, those poor low income people". As always you and the Left want to fuck the people that earned their property and homes to buy votes.

Gods you are stupid and racist. Did you mother have any kids that lived?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~

Stealing people's land so you can profit off the corruption in the whole building process, then bringing in a much higher density of low income, low IQ, low effort voters living on the public dole, all so you can retain or expand Leftist power and continue your profiteering off the government nipple through all kinds of "charities" and NGOs AND keep yourself in office. It's a great Leftist trifecta/hat trick of corruption all supported by morons like you because "mah feels, those poor low income people". As always you and the Left want to fuck the people that earned their property and homes to buy votes.

Gods you are stupid and racist. Did you mother have any kids that lived?

---

“wE lIvE oN sToLeN lAnD!” -Backshots (probably)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Back

What it sounds like to me is some white nationalist paranoid BS about replacing the white population with brown people.

---

You seriously are projecting so hard here.

You are like every other liberal Karen woman...

Why can't it just be about the issues.. and not some deep seeded guilt about your own racism?