Truer words...
Printable View
We shall see. I would be amused if Justice Thomas goes into another tirade that any constitution provision or amendment is limited to circumstances at the time of writing, particularly on the Rahimi matter who is arguing his right to threaten his former lovers with being shot to death shall not be infringed by taking away his guns. Mr Thomas probably thinks the government had no rights to protect women as Mr Rahimi alleges, because they were little more than possessions or chattal when the Constitution was drafted.
Trump was the one who gave the EO and directed the ATF on the bump stock ban, which I have been consistently critical of. I thought you would be happy if it’s struck down? Justice Thomas wouldn’t have to specify Bruen standard if morons like you simply understood what “shall not be infringed” means.
Well regulated..
https://media4.giphy.com/media/10Jhv...giphy.gif&ct=g
The hilarious part is: You really believe that the "well regulated" wording in the 2nd Amendment is about government regulations.
Because you are the Retard Champion of the entire Internet.