Printable View
I think he will be a bottomless source of conversation fodder. It's hard to find a past Speaker to whom to compare him. Perhaps William Pennington.Quote:
Originally Posted by Suppressed Poet
You mean after they took an active role in elevating him to his current position?Quote:
Originally Posted by Suppressed Poet
https://media.tenor.com/8tXIOAQmye4A...-and-right.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by ClydeR
You're gonna have to try harder than that if you're after Seran's belt.Quote:
Originally Posted by ClydeR
Granted, you're still hugely retarded, but you're also trying to compete with this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seran
The new speaker thinks that evolution bring taught in classrooms is tantamount to government abuse. Says really all one needs to know about the dude.Quote:
Originally Posted by ClydeR
Hey dick drinker, remember when you said this like 3 hours ago because you're a colossal fucking idiot?Quote:
Originally Posted by Seran
^ lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Seran
I'd say that says all anyone really needs to know about you, but everyone is already painfully aware of how much of a retard you are.
Funny you should bring up William Pennington. He was a Republican Speaker that attempted to preserve the Union & avoid Civil War by shielding slavery from future abolition. He failed, and history has not judged him kindly. I’m sure you are aware Democrats supported slavery at the time just as I’m aware of the Southern Strategy. So by bringing him up do you finally admit to Democrats being the party of slavery, or do you claim William Pennington as one of your own? You can’t have your cake and eat it too.Quote:
Originally Posted by ClydeR
Yes I suppose that is another way to look at it. Democrats had an active role in elevating Mike Johnson to Speaker. We agree on that. Congrats and I hope it was everything they hoped it would be.
ChatGPT doesn't think that poorly of William.
William Pennington was an American politician who served as the Governor of New Jersey and a member of the U.S. House of Representatives in the mid-19th century. His views on slavery were in line with the prevailing sentiments of his time and the political climate of the era.
During his tenure in the U.S. House of Representatives, Pennington, like many Northern politicians of the time, opposed the spread of slavery into new territories acquired by the United States. He was a member of the Republican Party, which was founded, in part, on an anti-slavery platform.
While Pennington may not have been an ardent abolitionist, he generally supported the Republican Party's stance against the expansion of slavery. However, his primary focus as a politician was on issues related to economic development, internal improvements, and infrastructure.
It's important to note that the views on slavery and the specific positions held by individuals in the 19th century can vary widely. Some Northern politicians were more vocally anti-slavery, while others may have had more moderate or nuanced positions. Additionally, the context of the time, including the sectional tensions leading up to the American Civil War, influenced the positions of many politicians on this issue.
"bring taught"Quote:
Originally Posted by Seran
https://gifdb.com/images/high/duh-we...e1syqalc2t.gif
It’s like when Pink Floyd sings “We don’t need no education” and the irony of that statement while using a double-negative, except that with Pink Floyd the lyrics were intentional for creative purposes while Seran is just ignorant.Quote:
Originally Posted by drumpel
Ignorant is when you don't know any better. Seran knows better, he's just too stupid to unfuck himself.Quote:
Originally Posted by Suppressed Poet