She had a lower popular vote until California hit. Trump never campaigned in California, because what is the point.
Printable View
http://memes.ucoz.com/_nw/50/73899779.jpg
Explain to us all how winning the popular vote for President has anything to do with actually winning the Presidency.
While you're at it.. explain how gerrymandering has anything to do with the Presidential election.
These talks are always highly entertaining.
Don't worry, I wouldn't want to let 8th-grade concepts interfere with your circle jerk.
"Republicans" And no, my point stands. It is a very valid point. Bush Jr was elected twice and Trump was Elected WITHOUT California. You don't need it to win and it is a hard state to get. There is NO fucking point in wasting time and money campaigning there because it isn't winnable.
You're arguing to one side of me. I'm not saying that Trump should have campaigned in California. He never could have won it. I mentioned California because its popular vote illustrates why Trump won. He won because he appealed to a vague nostalgia, a fear of difference, and a deeply rooted chauvinism. That message never would have gained traction in a generally prosperous and liberal place like California. It did gain traction across enough of the U.S. to pull off an Electoral College upset and steal the election, but he wasn't (and isn't) as popular nation-wide as you're making him out to be.
Here's the take-away: Literally the majority of people in the U.S. don't like Trump. We're currently in a government of the minority.