Is Trump Eligible to Run Again?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

As I thought, you couldn't cite any federal laws broken. It's okay, you don't understand Yemen is an active warzone and has been for decades or that US Support for allies in the area has included anti-terrorism strikes for decades. I don't blame you for being lazy, just ignorant.

---

You really need me to cite a federal law for murder?

How about 21 U.S. Code § 844 possession of a controlled substance? Charge Joe Biden with that right now. We found cocaine in his house.

The point of this exercise and why you don’t want to answer is because Presidents indeed have immunity from prosecution while in office and performance of official acts. SCOTUS previously ruled on this issue.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Suppressed Poet

You really need me to cite a federal law for murder?

How about 21 U.S. Code § 844 possession of a controlled substance? Charge Joe Biden with that right now. We found cocaine in his house.

The point of this exercise and why you don’t want to answer is because Presidents indeed have immunity from prosecution while in office and performance of official acts. SCOTUS previously ruled on this issue.

---

Droning an Afghani family, transporting water, because you needed a flex for getting 13 military members murdered during the botched Afghanistan withdraw.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Suppressed Poet

You really need me to cite a federal law for murder?

How about 21 U.S. Code § 844 possession of a controlled substance? Charge Joe Biden with that right now. We found cocaine in his house.

The point of this exercise and why you don’t want to answer is because Presidents indeed have immunity from prosecution while in office and performance of official acts. SCOTUS previously ruled on this issue.

---

Funny you claim murder, but I'll point out that killing terrorists isn't murder nor are the accidental deaths of 'bystanders' in proximity to terror subjects. You can't cite a single legitimate claim or law to support your argument.

Trump isn't President. The immunity conferred against civil suits for lawful acts in office doesn't confer criminal prosecution immunity nor does it magically extend to former Presidents. The Supreme Court did indeed rule that former president's can be prosecuted, you're correct there, which is why Trump's is facing the remainder of his life in prison.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

The Supreme Court did indeed rule that former president's can be prosecuted...

---

Quote:

---

you're correct there, which is why Trump's is facing the remainder of his life in prison.

---

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6zzLAhEyqo



1st grade level apostrophes: 9993287432423804872304

Seran the welfare leech in his 30s: 0

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

Funny you claim murder, but I'll point out that killing terrorists isn't murder nor are the accidental deaths of 'bystanders' in proximity to terror subjects. You can't cite a single legitimate claim or law to support your argument.

Trump isn't President. The immunity conferred against civil suits for lawful acts in office doesn't confer criminal prosecution immunity nor does it magically extend to former Presidents. The Supreme Court did indeed rule that former president's can be prosecuted, you're correct there, which is why Trump's is facing the remainder of his life in prison.

---

Were those American citizens targeted in a drone strike convicted of terrorism?

So let’s remove the President for a moment. Say instead of Obama, I flew to Yemen or wherever and killed those US citizens because I suspected them of terrorism. Is that perfectly legal too? We can just kill people we suspect of terrorism?

Also Yemen has been in civil war since 2014. I do believe this happened before then. Everyone including the Obama administration recognizes they were targeted and killed outside an active war zone. That’s why he made a playbook for drone strikes that the President has to directly authorize the attack outside a war zone. You would know this if you read the article referenced.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Suppressed Poet

Were those American citizens targeted in a drone strike convicted of terrorism?

So let’s remove the President for a moment. Say instead of Obama, I flew to Yemen or wherever and killed those US citizens because I suspected them of terrorism. Is that perfectly legal too? We can just kill people we suspect of terrorism?

Also Yemen has been in civil war since 2014. I do believe this happened before then. Everyone including the Obama administration recognizes they were targeted and killed outside an active war zone. That’s why he made a playbook for drone strikes that the President has to directly authorize the attack outside a war zone. You would know this if you read the article referenced.

---

Obama droned that kid on October 14, 2011

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Suppressed Poet

Were those American citizens targeted in a drone strike convicted of terrorism?

So let’s remove the President for a moment. Say instead of Obama, I flew to Yemen or wherever and killed those US citizens because I suspected them of terrorism. Is that perfectly legal too? We can just kill people we suspect of terrorism?

Also Yemen has been in civil war since 2014. I do believe this happened before then. Everyone including the Obama administration recognizes they were targeted and killed outside an active war zone. That’s why he made a playbook for drone strikes that the President has to directly authorize the attack outside a war zone. You would know this if you read the article referenced.

---

Hypotheticals have no bearing here. The President is a sworn officer of the Untied States and bound to act in the best interests of our country. Trump attempting to overthrow the elections process and to corruptly retain the office by organization of a coup is not in the best interest of the nation in the final months in office.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

Funny you claim murder, but I'll point out that killing terrorists isn't murder nor are the accidental deaths of 'bystanders' in proximity to terror subjects. You can't cite a single legitimate claim or law to support your argument.

Trump isn't President. The immunity conferred against civil suits for lawful acts in office doesn't confer criminal prosecution immunity nor does it magically extend to former Presidents. The Supreme Court did indeed rule that former president's can be prosecuted, you're correct there, which is why Trump's is facing the remainder of his life in prison.

---

Killing a US citizen is murder, since he was not charged or tried or convicted of being a terrorist.

Let's say that citizen was in Seattle and not Yemen.. do you believe it's right for a President to order a drone strike on him because the government determined he was a terrorist?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Methais

Obama droned that kid on October 14, 2011

---

Well, by kid, you mean Anwar al-Awlaki the US citizen Islamic cleric, then two weeks later, Obama did indeed drone his kid Abdulrahman al-Awlaki. Cause we like to keep it in the family.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage

Well, by kid, you mean Anwar al-Awlaki the US citizen Islamic cleric, then two weeks later, Obama did indeed drone his kid Abdulrahman al-Awlaki. Cause we like to keep it in the family.

---

Whoever the 16 year old retard was, yeah.