No, just calling you on your bullshit and spin again.
Printable View
What spin did I provide again? I don't recall claiming or even implying that the NYT didn't report on the fact that they were slaughtered, I merely mentioned the very real fact that the headline in question mentioned nothing about the brutal slaughter and kidnapping and focused on the religion of the victims, alluded to some sort of colonialism bullshit, and stated that their religion practiced polygamy. Shit the headline I provided even says "Murder in Mexico" so I'm not sure how you arrived to the conclusion that I was claiming the article didn't mention the fact that they were murdered.
Why do you hate facts so much? Oh, right, you're basically alt-left now because you're another person Trump broke.
Also, what did the article in question have to do with Trump in the first place? You were the one who brought it up. I know you wish that were you in the Nationals pic but give it a rest,
You omitted the fact that the main article did exactly discuss the AMBUSH. The one you posted was a side article, with a smaller headline with backstory.
Oh, wait, I see the problem. You must be talking about a different article from NYT because that headline you claimed is part of the story I am referring to isn't there. They did update the story I am referring to so it comes off as less douchey and they focus more on the brutal slaying and less on the religion of the victims, but even in the updated story I don't see the line you are referring to.
It's okay to be white, Some Rogue, but it's not okay to constantly be wrong about everything. Stop that.
I mentioned Trump because it's clear that Trump has broken you so much that you have turned into an empty shell of a human being. It's pretty obvious with the way you suck the dick of every bad person I mention. Or maybe you've always just been a horrible person. My bad if that's the case then.
Look, the story I am referring to WAS the main story. It had its own page on their website, it's own headline, was tweeted out by NYT and everything. I even quoted part of the headline that said "MURDER", how did I omit the fact that they discussed the murder? Almost the entire article was devoted to the victim's religion as opposed to the brutal slaying. There must be more people out there that don't hate Trump so much that they forgive bad actions on the part of the media because they completely redid the article I am referring to in order to focus more on the killings and less on the religion. Why would they do that if it was just a "side article with a smaller headline with backstory"? Almost as if you're wrong like you usually are and can't just admit it.
Yeah, they were side by side. Sorry your blinders were on.
Attachment 9455
I WONDER WHICH ONE IS THE MAIN STORY.
Of course I don't like Trump, I use more than 2% of my brain, but do you ever notice it is only you I respond to because you are a moron who picks and chooses facts, posts quotes and articles with no link to the actual article and just generally come off as an idiot with a hardon for Trump and I AM MAKING FUN OF YOU.
Gee really? You're making fun of me? Me no get that, me understand now.
You're not as clever or as deep as you think you are.
And yeah I like Trump, I'm not gonna deny that. Why would I? It's just funny that even in stories that have nothing to do with Trump you'll still come here with "BUT TRUMP!" And you wonder why I think Trump is the reason for you defending bad people, it's all you talk about when it comes to politics on the PC.
Do you REALLY like Trump, or do you just like all the other options a little less? I'm in the Trump is better than the competing sewage camp. But I'm not running up and down the aisles at work telling everyone I'm a Trump supporter. I am, for reasons above.
Let's face it though, he's a douche and while it's granted he does things I like, he does them in TERRIBLE ways and trips over himself doing them.