Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClydeR
I completely nailed it again!
Trump has classified the information in the book as top secret. It can't be published and can't be discussed in public in the Senate.Quote:
Washington (CNN)The White House has issued a formal threat to former national security adviser John Bolton to keep him from publishing his book, "The Room Where It Happened: A White House Memoir," sources familiar with the matter tell CNN.
More...
The only thing that's creepy is that you're trying to keep track of an internet rando's relationship status.Quote:
Originally Posted by Seran
You don't find that weird at all?
Absolutely no surprises here. I'd be curious to see how much of the information was previously deemed classified and how much was retroactively deemed classified to avoid disclosures during impeachment.Quote:
Originally Posted by ClydeR
What racist opinions do you have to share with us today?Quote:
Originally Posted by Seran
There's an interesting equivocation by a Trump attorney, arguing the President can't be held accountable so long as his opinion is that his actions are in the best interest of the country. Where do you draw the line? If the President feels deeding Montana to his children is in the best interest of the United States, should we all just look the other way Mr Dershowitz?Quote:
Dershowitz said: “Every public official that I know believes that his election is in the public interest. And mostly you’re right — your election is in the public interest. And if a president did something that he believes will help him get elected, in the public interest, that cannot be the kind of quid pro quo that results in impeachment.”
Yes. That's exactly what he said.
Would you prefer a President not do what he feels is in the best interest of the country?Quote:
Originally Posted by Seran
Another interesting response from a Trump attorney on the question of whether John Bolton should testify. His response goes down in the history books as the biggest waste of oxygen ever.
Quote:
Jay Sekulow responded, ""So again, to move that into a change in proceeding so to speak, I think it is not correct. The evidence that has already been presented, an accusation that if you get into witnesses, and I'll do this very briefly, if we get down the road on the witness issues, let's be clear, it should not be and I cannot dictate to this body, but it should certainly not be though that the House managers get John Bolton and the President's lawyers get no witness. We would expect if they are getting witnesses, we will get witnesses, and then those witnesses would then, and all of that, just to be clear, changes the nature and scope of the proceedings and they did not ask for it before,"
When are you going to tell us why you hate Mexicans though?Quote:
Originally Posted by Seran
Schumer invited Lev Parnas to be his personal guest at the impeachment trial. You know Parnas, that guy who has been charged with several felonies and is facing some serious prison time and is now trying to pin all of the blame on Trump in some sort of desperate move to get a plea deal? Yeah, that guy.
Well police officers had to escort Parnas out of the Senate building during the trial because people with ankle monitors aren't allowed in the Senate gallery.
What the fuck is wrong with Democrats?
If Hitler were brought back to life Democrats would celebrate him if he wrote a book about how much he hated Trump.