Cut some farts.
Printable View
That will happen any day now.
Except, as always, you remain completely divorced from reality, and there was no "spy" -- much to your obvious dismay.
Tom Rooney, Republican on the House Intelligence Committee:
"What is the point of saying that there was a spy in the campaign when there was none? You know what I’m saying? It’s like, ‘Lets create this thing to tweet about, knowing that it’s not true.’ … Maybe it’s just to create more chaos but it doesn’t really help the case." Source.
Trey "King of Benghazi" Gowdy, Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, post briefing, to Fox News:
"I am even more convinced that the FBI did exactly what my fellow citizens would want them to do. It has nothing to do with Donald Trump."
House Speaker Ryan:
"Gowdy's initial assessment is accurate. I've seen no evidence to the contrary."
Senate Majority Leader McConnell:
"I support both (the OIG and Mueller investigations), and I don't really have anything to add to this subject based upon the Gang of Eight briefing that we had today, which was classified."
Reality continues to be so embarrassing and inconvenient to you. But that's what happens when you take the cheeto-in-chief's Twitter rants at face value.
That's a dumbfounding response.
Trump had at least 4 different stated reasons for firing Comey that changed- at one point- within hours. Do you actually not remember this?
And at the end- he was on national television clearly stating he did it because of the Russia investigation. Do you actually not remember this either?
This is exactly my point.
Spoiler Alert: The next paragraph of the article you quoted -- which you conveniently didn't continue with -- says: "but there is no evidence that Clinton herself or her campaign spread the story."
Not only is there absolutely no evidence that anyone in the Clinton campaign spread the birther nonsense, the "evidence" the Trump campaign tried to cite in favor of it never brings up anything remotely relevant. And more than that, even if you could somehow demonstrate that Clinton was responsible for it, she never touted the issue -- unlike Trump, who literally conned retarded conservatives about it on Twitter for years.
Your own mostly-delusional article confirms the IPAB -- which still wasn't "a death panel" -- never had a single appointment. All IPAB had the power to do, even if it had been filled, was to make recommendations to Congress. If anything, opposition to IPAB demonstrates the hypocrisy that supposedly "fiscally conservative" Republicans have.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
Ooh! How inconvenient for you -- Trump's handpicked NASA administrator, himself a climate change skeptic Republican congressman from Oklahoma appointed in April -- just announced that he now understands and accepts climate science:Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
NASA administrator Bridenstein, testifying before Congress: “The National Climate Assessment, that includes NASA, and it includes the Department of Energy, and it includes NOAA, has clearly stated it is extremely likely, [that] is the language they use, that human activity is the dominant cause of global warming, and I have no reason to doubt the science that comes from that.” Bridenstine said.
Senator Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii): “Is it fair to call this an evolution of your views?”
Bridenstine: “Yes.”
Source.
Too bad "collusion" has already been established, by Trump Jr's own admission on Twitter, no less. Did you forget about the 70+ criminal charges that have been filed, resulting in a half-dozen guilty pleas already? Stay tuned, my delusional friend.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
So in Ashlianaville Clinton campaign is not Clinton but Trump campaign members are Trump ?
The fact is, as stated by Clinton campaign members, the Clinton team started the birther movement.
More importantly, PK is outed as pedophile and magically Ashliana comes out of the woodwork.
Confirmed Ashliana is PK the pedophile.
You didn't even read your own article, or my response to you. Try again. Your article disproves your assertions.
Uhh.. I don't know what kind of fanfic you're writing, but please leave me out of it. Also, nice concession on all the other issues, especially the climate change one.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
Not wanting to reply to your entire line of drivel on my cellphone is not a concession, it's me not wanting to spend 20 minutes dissecting your hackery.
Again, Clinton's own campaign advisor from '08 is the one who is saying members of the Clinton campaign started the birther BS. I know this because I was a part of the'08 Obama campaign and specifically remember the day rumor rolled out. Trump was not even in the picture, at all.
I didn't feel the need to paste the entire article as it makes clear in what I posted that it was Clinton campaign members.
Nope. You conceded -- you could have waited until you weren't on a phone to respond, but chose not to. I love the blatant stupidity that goes into calling pointing out your failure to read your own article, and literally quoting Trump's agency administrators verbatim as "hackery."
Wrong. Your own article:Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
"Patti Solis Doyle, Clinton’s campaign manager during part of the 2008 race, told CNN on Friday that an Iowa campaign worker had passed on an email about the birther conspiracy and that Clinton quickly fired him."
Nowhere does that establish that "the Clinton campaign started the birther BS" as you're retardedly claiming. If anything, it demonstrates the opposite.
Your own article: "There is no evidence that Clinton herself or her campaign spread the story."
Your article itself admits that there is no evidence, whatsoever, that anyone with the Clinton campaign started the birther movement -- and again, even if you could demonstrate that, that in no way explains or rationalizes Trump's multiple years of conning gullible reactionary morons like yourself.
Ok, PK.
P.S. I am at home, just moved 1700 miles this past week and the house is in shambles. You should take it as a courtesy that I took the time to reply to your circular logic.
This reminds me that I have rudely left Ticket hanging. I'll give you more details Ticket when this place is a bit more organized. Sorry for the delay. :(
grrrr. Replace ticket with Tisket.
People.. we FINALLY HAVE CONCRETE EVIDENCE OF TRUMP / RUSSIA COLLUSION!!!!!!!!
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/08/trum...-like-g-7.html
Literally, it was a simple question.. even a simpleton like yourself could have answered it.
Instead, you deflect. I'm guessing your the type of guy who wears crazy colored hair to deflect gaze upon all the ugliness below the pretty hair.
So again... "Would you be against it if it were spying vs. being an informant?
A simple question.. nothing more.
Selective memory issue. Even Rosenstein recommended Comey's termination.
And at the end, he clearly stated he did it because:
“As far as I’m concerned, I want that thing to be absolutely done properly. When I did this now, I said I probably maybe will confuse people. Maybe I’ll expand that — you know, I’ll lengthen the time because it should be over with. It should — in my opinion, should’ve been over with a long time ago because it — all it is an excuse. But I said to myself I might even lengthen out the investigation. But I have to do the right thing for the American people. He’s the wrong man for that position.”
Do you actually think Russia, which was thrown out of the G8 for the invasion of Ukraine and annexation of Crimea should be in the G7, the are still attacking multiple European countries election services and the US power grid, other then that oh and the murders of Putin critics, I am sure they are good people too?
It's a moot point, as your question is predicated on false assumptions. As even the Republicans involved have stated repeatedly, the FBI did it's job as intended, properly, justifiably.
Kudos, however, on you deflecting yourself -- without a shred of self-awareness -- as well as using the incorrect usage of "you're." Impressive.
Are you coming down with Alzheimer's? You asked that question of Time -- and it was moronic of you when you asked her (and she certainly had no burden of answering it, either). Your question is predicated on your faulty assumptions, rooted in your ignorance.
Isn't it funny how something can be so dumb that it's even shot down by Republicans and Fox News, but lo and behold, Parkbandit is retarded enough to uncritically parrot Trump. Impressive as always.
So.. is it the dripping HIV in your eyes that makes you respond to simple questions that aren't for you.. literally with no answers?
It's funny how you roll around in stupidity and all the while, you STILL were unable to muster enough intelligence to type out a "yes" or "no".
Also, there is absolutely nothing about you that is "impressive".
Sorry. Did you want to try for a third time.. or did you just want to not answer another question not for you with another post where you can't answer... yet again?
A question doesn't have to be directed to someone in order for them to point out that it's predicated on faulty assumptions, my willfully deluded friend.
See above. Your question is meaningless. FYI: Periods go inside quotation marks. If you're going to be questioning other people's intelligence, perhaps you should first demonstrate an 8th grader's level of mastery over your presumably native language.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
I realize you're completely flabbergasted by the notion, gnashing your teeth in your usual impotent rage -- but your "question" doesn't magically become any more valid by repeating it. Your obsession with a magical conspiracy theory that even Republicans -- even Fox News -- have debunked reflects only on you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
But you still can't/won't/are too stupid to answer it. Fantastic.
It's not meaningless.. you just can't/won't are too stupid to answer it. Fantastic.Quote:
See above. Your question is meaningless. FYI: Periods go inside quotation marks. If you're going to be questioning other people's intelligence, perhaps you should first demonstrate an 8th grader's level of mastery over your presumably native language.
Flabbergaasted? Isn't that your nickname?Quote:
I realize you're completely flabbergasted by the notion, gnashing your teeth in your usual impotent rage -- but your "question" doesn't magically become any more valid by repeating it. Your obsession with a magical conspiracy theory that even Republicans -- even Fox News -- have debunked reflects only on you.
And what exactly has Fox News "debunked"? A question I'm asking?
You really are the weakest link. Thankfully, we have Darwin's Law and knowing that your "special" kind of stupidity will end with you gives me hope for the world.
Nope. I merely pointed out that you're a deluded imbecile for asking a stupid question predicated on your ignorance of law enforcement.
It is meaningless. You not understanding how law enforcement operates reflects solely on you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Fox debunked the notion that the FBI """spied""" on the Trump campaign:Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
"There were no spies in Trump's campaign, of this Fox News can confirm, we have no evidence of any spies. It's talk." 1m, 10s.
Debunked by Fox, debunked by all the relevant Republicans. Doubling down on your humiliation doesn't change it. Even Nunes stopped shrieking hysterically after DOJ briefed him on the evidence. Why? Because the evidence is damaging to the Trump campaign, and they don't want it getting out. (Beeteedubs: It's getting out, eventually, in the form of Mueller's report).
Though, speaking of the "end" -- I know you're super bitter about whites inevitably becoming an ever-dwindling minority in the United States; nothing Trump can do is going to change that. Sorry, Archie Bunker 2.0.
Mueller filed new indictment charges today against Manafort. Next Friday should be very interesting.. :popcorn:
Quote:
Special counsel Robert Mueller filed new witness tampering criminal charges against ex-Trump campaign chief Paul Manafort as well as Russian citizen Konstantin Kilimnik as a defendant.
The superseding indictment lodged by a grand jury sitting in federal court in Washington, DC, came days after Mueller asked the judge in Manafort's case to revoke his $10 million bail and jail him because of an alleged effort to tamper with witnesses.
Manafort, 69, and the 48-year-old Moscow resident Kilimnik were both hit with new charges accusing them of obstructing justice and conspiracy to obstruct justice by using intimidation or force against a witness, and also with tampering with a witness, victim or informant.
This guy poses a question on that needs answered.Quote:
No serious foreign policy analyst I know (nor any ex-Trump Admin official) has a good explanation for why Trump is so singularly enamored with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Whatever the reason is, we don’t know it yet.
https://twitter.com/ianbremmer/statu...392960512?s=19
This is from an opinion piece. I'll include a link but it doesnt matter because people all across the news and,social media are asking the same question. Why is trump splintering the USA away from our allies to coddle up with Russia?
The only world leader who can rely on trump is PutinQuote:
Putin can hardly conceal his glee. He's in Europe now, presenting himself as a more reliable trading partner, basking in the success of populist Europeans, who want to pull closer to Moscow and have been winning elections in Hungary, Italy, Austria, Greece and elsewhere.
Trump is weakening the alliances that gave strength to America. At the same time, he is aiding Putin, who took a nascent democracy and turned into an autocratic regime where political rivals are imprisoned or murdered in the streets, and he is helping to make him stronger.
None of that's working. He started with a great economy and its continued the same trend it was on. Tax cuts mean bigger deficits and national debt. It hasn't trickled down. Anyone can meet Kim. That's no breakthrough. To get the meeting trump backed off, started calling him honorable and talked about playing golf with the guy.
You're too enamored with short term low hanging fruit. We're not building a solid foundation of anything. Just chasing headlines. If anyone should be critical it'd be a proper conservative.
Oh soywolf...
https://media3.giphy.com/media/BBAdXxBAXp3wc/giphy.gif
20 indictments with more on the way.
#winning
omgogmgogmgomwjkasjkljaskljAkjiapoakawjaasdjasjd it's happening!!!11infinity!!
https://media0.giphy.com/media/816QOYrqg1MME/giphy.gif
And they wonder why there's an investigationQuote:
1. Trump's campaign manager was charged with CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE UNITED STATES and now he's been charged, working in concert with an individual with "ties to Russian intelligence," with obstruction of justice
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/06/kon...mpression=trueQuote:
writer Christopher Strohm argues that the charges against Kilimnik represent a breakthrough in the case because it “links senior officials on President Donald Trump’s presidential campaign to Russian intelligence in a criminal matter.”
“This is an alleged Russian spy committing crimes with the former campaign chairman for Trump,” former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti told Bloomberg. “When people first thought of the Mueller investigation, this is what people thought would result from it.”
So much for being a nothing-burger/witch hunt!
Yes, this is finally it. Because an Alex Jonesian website said so.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/raw-story/Quote:
hese media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Notes: The Raw Story is an American online news organization founded in 2004 by John Byrne. It covers current national and international political and economic news and publishes its own editorials and investigative pieces. The Raw Story describes itself as progressive, bringing attention to stories that it sees as downplayed or ignored by other media outlets. Raw Story demonstrates left wing bias in reporting and story selection. Raw Story has a Half-True claim with Politifact and an Unproven claim with Snopes. (5/15/2016)
The author is a fucking Portlandia nutbag.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keXx0zxTarE
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/bar...ollars-n880506Quote:
Obama-era license aimed to let Iran convert money in dollars
The Obama administration secretly sought to give Iran brief access to the U.S. financial system.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...=.ffba8103f8e1Quote:
NGO connected to Obama’s 2008 campaign used U.S. tax dollars trying to oust Netanyahu
https://i.pinimg.com/736x/1a/89/0c/1...inton-njie.jpg
I'm sure I'll be recalling more as the coffee clears out the cobwebs.
I notice you're bold, panicked attempt to change the subject. Are you so fragile you can't just say you were wrong?
Wrong about what? Let's dissect what you posted:
What you have is opinions, that is all, nothing more.Quote:
This is an alleged Russian spy committing crimes with the former campaign chairman for Trump,” former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti (Who just happens to be running for IL attorney general) told Bloomberg. “When people first thought of the Mueller investigation, this is what people thought would result from it.”
Alleged Russian agents.
Indicted: Formally accuse of or charge with a serious crime. (meaning, thus far nobody is guilty)
But you know, I'm a treasonous birch because I believe in innocent until proven guilty. We do know Democrats basically set DC on fire because "Whitewater, must be brought to heel, what does it matter anyway, you mean wipe like with a cloth" Hillary didn't win after spending over a billion dollars on an election loss.
Says the "guy" who has multiple people on ignore because words hurt hims widdle feelings.....
Jesus, please read this book:
https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1...l/25534941.jpg
Bernie was already fined dumbass, found guilty, in a court of law. Trump as of today is still innocent, unlike the socialist you supported who has already seen his day in court and was found to be guilty.
Please come back to play again when you can cite something other than Alex Jonesian opinion articles.
Again Democrats set DC on fire during what is supposed to be the peaceful transition of power. This is the side you're standing up for.
You didn't answer my question of who Bernie was colluding with and no, Trump isn't innocent, he's already been found guilty in the court of global public opinion. And opinion articles? There is nothing opinion about the 20 indictments handed down by a grand jury with more on the way.
Seriously how fucking stupid can you be. The same people that fixed the Democrat primary's are pointing the fingers and your all like "oh yes, Trump bad." What a bunch of drones.
You're such a low energy troll. Can't wait for more indictments to come down so I can watch as you furiously deflect reality.
Furiously deflect?
You just went from "world court of opinion" to "Derp, I was just trolling" to "you're a troll" and still can't link Trump to anything after 2 fucking years dude.
But hey, the people that fixed the race against your candidate, pissed away a billion dollars on a loser and lit up DC are the ones telling you the truth. It's really sad to watch.
Sorry you couldn't recognize my blatant trolling with that one. Maybe Rocktar is right and you should stop smoking weed?
So funny.:pirate:
Some words from KellyAnne Conways husband about the Mueller probe and trumps tweets attacking it.
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefi...mpression=trueQuote:
"Unfortunately for the president, these writings are no more correct than the spelling in his original tweet. And in light of the president's apparent embrace of Calabresi's conclusions, it is well worth taking a close look at Calabresi's argument in support of those conclusions," he writes.
Calabresi has argued that Mueller's probe is "null and void" because it violates the Appointments Clause of the Constitution, Article II, Section 2, Clause 2.
"The 'constitutional' arguments made against the special counsel do not meet that standard and had little more rigor than the tweet that promoted them. Such a lack of rigor, sadly, has been a disturbing trend in much of the politically charged public discourse about the law lately, and one that lawyers - regardless of their politics - owe a duty to abjure," Conway said.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...sia-troll-case
Drop it or move forward. What say the PC?Quote:
U.S. Special Counsel Robert Mueller warned that Russian intelligence services still have active “interference operations” into U.S. elections and that handing over certain evidence in a criminal case could imperil ongoing investigations. Mueller on Tuesday asked a federal judge in Washington for an order to protect voluminous evidence sought by lawyers for Concord Management and Consulting LLC, one of three companies and 13 Russian nationals charged in a February indictment alleging election meddling via social media. Prosecutors have uncovered evidence of other individuals and entities who are “continuing to engage” in similar activities. The legal battle between Mueller and Concord’s attorneys highlights the tension between intelligence-gathering, which is cloaked in secrecy, and the U.S. legal system, which entitles criminal defendants to review evidence against them. Lawyers for Concord, a company linked to a longtime associate of Russian President Vladimir Putin, have been negotiating to obtain documents from the special counsel to mount a legal defense.
I didn't realize there was a battle going on here. It seems that Nunes is trying to get his little fingers all up in any trump/Russia pie to defend Donnie and Rosenstein is quietly protecting the independence of the DOJ. Calling it a battle implies the wrong thing.Quote:
Washington (CNN)Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein's ongoing battle with House Republicans reached new heights Tuesday, as the No. 2 senior leader of the Justice Department plans to call on the House to investigate its own committee staff.
Rosenstein has butted heads with House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes for months over a subpoena for documents related to the Russia investigation, but the battle spilled out into public view Tuesday after Fox News reported staff on the committee felt "personally attacked" at a meeting with Rosenstein in January.
Justice Department officials dispute the recounting of the closed-door meeting detailed in the story, and Rosenstein now plans to "request that the House general counsel conduct an internal investigation of these Congressional staffers' conduct" when he returns from a foreign trip this week, a Justice Department official said.
"The Deputy Attorney General never threatened anyone in the room with a criminal investigation," the official said. "The FBI Director, the senior career ethics adviser for the Department, and the Assistant Attorney General for Legislative Affairs who were all present at this meeting are all quite clear that the characterization of events laid out here is false.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/12/polit...ion/index.html
Quote:
The Washington Post had a big scoop on Sunday: During the 2016 presidential campaign, Donald Trump’s longtime adviser Roger Stone had an undisclosed meeting with a Russian man offering to sell dirt on the then-presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton. The meeting, which the Post says was not disclosed to congressional investigators, has reportedly come up as part of Special Counsel Robert Muller’s investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election. It was arranged by Michael Caputo, a Trump campaign communications official.
And you wonder why this investigation is still on going? If these fucks would have just told the investigators about their Russian contacts the first time they're asked it'd be so much easier.
https://www.motherjones.com/politics...n-roger-stone/
Spoiler Alert: Even a biased source can report on an objective occurrence. While it might be a thought-terminating sight for you to behold, reality isn't quite so convenient. Motherjones is quoting WaPo. The right-leaning rags were also reporting on it.
Don't you feel stupid now? No, that would require a sense of shame.
Tgo01's demonstrated reading comprehension level: Six-year old. Classic. Try again.
https://i.imgur.com/3XOZBE9.png
Hey now... you would NEVER hear It criticize any right wing sources........................................... .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .......
Ever.............................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .......................
Wow, I forgot how hard you doubled down when called out on your stupidity. Let me try again.
You called out Methias for poking fun at cwolff for sourcing Mother Jones because according to you it's possible for a biased source to report on a "objective occurrence", you then noted that Mother Jones was simply quoting WAPO, thus implying WAPO isn't biased. I correctly called you out on this shit because WAPO is basically the same thing as Mother Jones.
I ran this by my dog first to see if he understood it and he confirmed it was simple to understand, so if you still don't get it then I'm afraid I can't help you any further :(
Is your dog named Baxter by chance?
The only one doubling down on stupidity here, I'm afraid, is you. The entire point of my response to Methais was that the source doesn't matter when they're reporting on something that's, at this point, common knowledge -- a topic on which you could find reporting from any ideological slant, even a right-wing one, which I also included.
You didn't call anyone out on anything. All you did was demonstrate your inability or unwillingness to read -- which only reflects on you, revealing you as the imbecile I called you out on being. You've subsequently humiliated yourself again in an exchange with me, for the 100th time. Congrats.
The point is cwolff gets his news from fringe sites like motherjones regularly, as he's always linking shit from them while ripping on every source he disagrees with that gets posted, whether it's from infowars or a "normal" site. The actual article in that one particular post isn't the point, especially since he has a meltdown anytime someone mentions infowars regardless of what's in the link. And for that matter, so do you.
I honestly didn't think this would have to be spelled out, but then again...
PB is correct in that I should have known that you would show up at the mere mention of jizz, but I forgot that you existed until a couple minutes ago.
Don't you feel stupid now? No, that would require more than Zero. Self. Awareness.
Here are the things I want to know re: the russia investigation:
1: How much in taxes did Stormy Daniels pay on the 130K fuck buddy buy off slush fund did she have to pay?
B: When will the Peter Strzok tell all book come out - cause you know his ass is getting shitcanned, so he'll make a few mil and retire a la the "Trump Hateraide" express
III: When will the Russia "reset" button get pushed?
d: Does Trump use russian dressing on his salads? Cause motherfucker if I was him I sure as fuck would be on TV eating a shitload of Russian dressing on my salad while I simultaneously build a wall of croutons from Mexico around it.
5a: Grab that pussy
That's right, tardbandit. Hold on to your gem from a decade ago. In the meantime, we'll just have to bring up your ongoing, festering mental illness and obsession in sending other men on the internet years of angry, sexualized messages:
Seek psychiatric care.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit's impotent rage
+1 for use of the term cock-snorkeling though right? :lol:
It is a gem. Remember when you said you weren't really using an alt to agree with yourself.. but you forgot to login to the other account?
Kinda blows that bullshit out of the water... doesn't it kid.
You keep thinking that my red rep comments are some sort of queer come on to you. Sorry It.. you are most definitely not my type.Quote:
In the meantime, we'll just have to bring up your ongoing, festering mental illness and obsession in sending other men on the internet years of angry, sexualized messages
Me calling you a peter puffer is absolutely no different than you saying I suffer from dementia. You just feel that because you are a fag, that it should give you some sort of protection from people making fun of you.. all the while you should feel free to make fun of others with immunity. Doesn't work that way.
Says the "guy" who pretends to be something HE is not online.Quote:
Seek psychiatric care.
If only you could live online.. but everytime you turn off the computer.. you're still in that body :(
Well, she is a porn star.. so nasty is obvious.
But she's doing all this to make more money. Her career was floundering until she decided to break her NDA. Now, with all the IHATETRUMP!!!! ers out there.. she's making bank.
Good for her... but I DO hope she's sued for breaking her NDA.
How you've lived on this earth for 60+ years and still can't understand the basics of your native language is astounding, but as always, reflects only on you.
You've spent untold hours of your life writing furious, sexualized messages to other men on the Internet. Ongoing. For years. How you rationalize your mental illness is your business, but beeteedubs, doesn't make you look any less full of impotent rage.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Much like your first sentence, the only one indulging in fantasy here is you. Kindly leave me out of your bizarre fanfics. Seek psychiatric care.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Except when you and other Liberal/Socialist shitposters want to demean, disagree with or simply dismiss someone who posted a source that doesn’t agree with your narrative. Please go away, you haven’t had a rational thought in decades and I am pretty sure haven’t made a rational argument or statement here ever though I haven’t read everything you posted so I could be wrong but statistically it’s a good bet that I am right.
Translation: "Someone who isn't a neoconservative troglodyte balked when I unironically cited InfoWars! Uhhh.. I'm just going to pretend the mainstream media is its equivalent! Even though I can't actually demonstrate that that's the case, I feel very strongly about it!"
Especially comical that you -- like Methais and Tgo -- still missed the forest for the trees. The inability to read goes hand in hand with you being a troglodyte, I suppose.
Translation: I am asshurt that others don't just swallow the line of shit I am spewing hook, line and ballsweat.
Congratulations on learning a new word.
BTW, I can't miss a point you haven't made yet. Mostly you are just ranting trying to use belligerence, vitriol and hubris to cover up for a completely inadequate and tenuous lack of "reasoning" in an argument you have no hope of winning.
When did you first understand that your parent's didn't love you and wanted you to go away? Here is something that might actually help you.
https://youtu.be/HzMXtu93iQI
Why don't you explain it again... the excuse you came up with for using one login to agree with another login.
See? You keep making it sound like calling you a fucking faggot is sexualized. It's not. It's like when you say "You've lived on this earth for 60+ years".. I don't suddenly believe you want to be an old man or that you are saying anything except "wow, you're old".Quote:
You've spent untold hours of your life writing furious, sexualized messages to other men on the Internet. Ongoing. For years. How you rationalize your mental illness is your business, but beeteedubs, doesn't make you look any less full of impotent rage.
I know you want there to be some other sexualized message from a guy to you, but that's just you hoping and praying that finally, a guy is somehow interested in you and you don't have to catfish him.
For the untold number of times: I'm not interested at all in any guy... ESPECIALLY you. Sorry. Hopefully, you get the idea this time. #MeToo
You're the one that pretends to be a girl when you are online. Not me.Quote:
Much like your first sentence, the only one indulging in fantasy here is you. Kindly leave me out of your bizarre fanfics. Seek psychiatric care.
Fucking freak.
4th post in a row. I must be very upset.
Ouch. Russian TV is saying trump is Putins bitch. We already knew that, but it's fucked up that they say it.Quote:
Responding to reports that Trump told world leaders at the G-7 meeting in Canada last week that Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula is Russian because everyone there speaks Russian, the hosts of the Russian version of 60 Minutes victoriously declared that “Crimea is ours, Trump is ours.”
http://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump...source=Twitter
I like how both Russia and North Korea suddenly became credible news sources to the left. :lol:
Dumbasses.
https://media.giphy.com/media/F0E72ofVJFEGc/giphy.gif
That 70s Show debuted in 1998.
Beavis & Butthead debuted in 1993.
Therefore you should be the one seeking allowance.
Reported.
EDIT: I will allow it anyway, because Clarence Boddicker.
http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/...picture-11.png
Clarence Boddicker would kick Red Forman's ass. But not before requesting that Kitty leave the premises immediately...
https://youtu.be/o97uNzbBfis
Translation: "I couldn't come up with anything related to what you said, so I dressed up my antipathy for you in a new package."
That would be because you missed it. Along with Tgo, Methais, and the rest of the troglodytes. Isn't it funny how the ability to think critically escapes you all? I wonder what else you have in common? Hmmm..Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~
You'd have more credibility here if you'd actually substantively addressed anything I'd said, which, y'know, you didn't. Please try again, though.Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~
:rofl: Don't worry. The mean liberals and their unfriendly facts will go away at some point. Better turn on some Alex Jones to make yourself feel better.Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~
Uhh.. That wasn't an excuse. That was literally the means by which my use of two accounts was discovered. How do you think it was? You, with your brilliant powers of deduction, just figured it out? Nope. I fucked it up, after like a week, after using an account for like 3 days, 10 years ago. Stupid, granted, but on the flip side, caused you a decade of obsession, paranoid accusations of like 10 other people being secretly me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
You spent years dreaming up explicit, angry, sexualized messages to other men on the Internet. I'm not the only one, either, as evidenced by the rep-ageddon thread. People who aren't deranged don't spend hours of their time dreaming up sexual things to say other men on the Internet.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
* Citation needed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Much to your obvious dismay, your assertions don't have the power to magically transform reality and make them true. Quite inconveniently for you, there's a post in my history where my account is less than a month old, calling someone out for assuming that "female-sounding name on an RPG-based forum=female in real life" is a stupid assumption.
On the flip side, your festering mental illness is a matter of common knowledge now. If only you'd seek the psychiatric care you so desperately need.
Doubling down on your inability or unwillingness to think doesn't change anything. "B-b-b-but supposedly Cwolf does it, and I was doing it ironically!" still makes you retarded.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
It's a good thing that's nothing even close to what I said. It's also not a good thing for you that you still can't wrap your brain around what I actually was saying.
Not that facts have ever mattered to you in the first place though. Look no further than the contents of your panties for proof of that.
Nope. Sorry, Methais. Doing what you claim Cwolff does is still retarded -- even if it's supposedly to "make a point." Board liberals deserve to be called out, too, if they stop thinking as soon as they see an article from Fox, or The Hill, or The Economist, etc. InfoWars is in a league of its own, as a far-right conspiracy website, though the fact that you people cite it is as unsurprising as it is sad.
Feel free to quote any post from me linking "news" from some fringe site motherjones equivalent while you're making those claims.
It's also not a claim in regards to cwolff. It's pretty well documented in his own post history.
And who other than Rocktar was citing Info Wars? I assume it's multiple people, since you said "you people."
You don't even get an E for effort.
You can't even be honest when you are actually caught on a forum being pathetic? Just own it.
It wasn't "like 3 days", it was at least 3 months.. since Kierphe's join date is 07-22-2008. Nice try. And it would still be going on today if you didn't get chastised for being so pathetic.
And I'm talking about the story you attempted to come up with a couple months back, where you were denying you used another account to agree with another account.. which forced me to dig up my new avatar and shut you up.
You did a fantastic job of deleting all Kierphe's posts in a poor attempt to scrub away your stupidity. Too bad people quoted the stupidity already. You even deleted your post, quoting Kierphe's post.
Sad.
I'm not sure how calling you a peter puffing fag turned into "dreaming up explicit, angry sexualized messages to other men".. pretty sure you are just doing some wishful thinking there. As I've explained.. you would be the very last thing I would ever be interested in. Sorry. You should have kept on pretending to be a female... you would have had a better chance.Quote:
You spent years dreaming up explicit, angry, sexualized messages to other men on the Internet. I'm not the only one, either, as evidenced by the rep-ageddon thread. People who aren't deranged don't spend hours of their time dreaming up sexual things to say other men on the Internet.
Says the guy, pretending to be a girl on a forum and in a game.. because in real life, he's trapped inside a body he and no one else likes.Quote:
* Citation needed.
Much to your obvious dismay, your assertions don't have the power to magically transform reality and make them true. Quite inconveniently for you, there's a post in my history where my account is less than a month old, calling someone out for assuming that "female-sounding name on an RPG-based forum=female in real life" is a stupid assumption.
On the flip side, your festering mental illness is a matter of common knowledge now. If only you'd seek the psychiatric care you so desperately need.
You're the one in desperate need of mental attention. Sorry. (not sorry)
OMG I'M UPSET TWO TIMES IN TWO THREADS!
Nope. You've returned, as always, to your deranged fanfic only loosely based on planet Earth. Like I've been telling you for years, your Alzheimer's-riddled brain can't recall details of conversations you participated in. And the original point of the account wasn't to participate in politics, so no, sorry, your "join date vs. capture date" is wishful thinking on your part.
Spoiler Alert: Someone who isn't deranged and obsessive doesn't spend their time dreaming up angry, detailed sexualized messages to send to other men on the Internet, literally for years, cycling through rep as fast as he could, in order to send them more messages. Of all the people revealed as shitty bigots full of impotent rage, you're in a class of your own.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
What's that? Tardbandit indulging in his weird fanfic, totally unable to substantiate his fantastical claims for the 1,000 time? Why, yes. I wonder if it has anything to do with his deranged obsession with other men on the Internet?Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
https://media1.giphy.com/media/wbS3xLLR3T0wE/giphy.gif
Seek psychiatric care.
What are you even talking about now? You are doubling down on your HiV addled stupidity, when all you have to do is look at the Kierphe's join date of 07-22-2008 and the stupidity that is you was exposed in October? That's not 3 days.. even for a retard like you. It's not wishful thinking on my part at all.. that's just the facts. YOU choose to spin it into "Um, I didn't want to post in politics.. and only did it 3 days.. " or whatever bullshit you are trying to excuse away your stupidity.
Literally, this was the single biggest epic failure of any human being on this forum. Ever.
Sorry. No amount of excuses you can come up with will change that fact.
It's like you keep regurgitating the same old lines. You're worse than Marco Rubio in the 3rd debate.Quote:
Spoiler Alert: Someone who isn't deranged and obsessive doesn't spend their time dreaming up angry, detailed sexualized messages to send to other men on the Internet, literally for years, cycling through rep as fast as he could, in order to send them more messages. Of all the people revealed as shitty bigots full of impotent rage, you're in a class of your own.
I can't tell you any clearer that calling you a queer doesn't take me long to "dream up". It's not sexualized any more than you calling me old... you just take it sexually because in your little head, when a guy says you're a fag, you take that as a come on. That's only in your head though. Sorry.
Let me guess.. Fanfic and troglodyte are on your words to use 100 times in a week calendar?Quote:
What's that? Tardbandit indulging in his weird fanfic, totally unable to substantiate his fantastical claims for the 1,000 time? Why, yes. I wonder if it has anything to do with his deranged obsession with other men on the Internet?
https://media1.giphy.com/media/wbS3xLLR3T0wE/giphy.gif
Seek psychiatric care.
Get some new material.
Also:
http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e6...3/Assliana.jpg
Ohhhh... That was Ashliana responding to himself?
What a fucking retard.
Nope. It's your wishful thinking, severe lack of critical reasoning skills, and Alzheimer's-riddled brain at work again. As I told you years ago, the account was created messing around with rep and auctions, not to post in politics, which would be required for your "(created on x date, participated until end date)" claim to be true.
Spoiler Alert: Either way, "only doing it for 3 days" isn't substantively different from your "did it for 3 months" assertion. It's just funny that you can't even remember the details of something that caused you a decade of derangement, obsession and paranoia in accusing how many other people of being me?
Nope, I'm afraid that was reserved for this, the day your impotent rage was exposed:Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
https://i.imgur.com/8gz60Yp.png
If only it were just "calling someone queer." You have a decade-long, established history of sending other men furious, sexually graphic messages on the Internet. Absolutely no mental gymnastics rationalizes the fantasies you spent hours of your life dreaming up. Sorry.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
"Get some new material" says the guy cherishing a 10-year old screenshot? I was in my early 20's when I did that, and sure, it was stupid. You were in, what, your early 50's when you began your decade-long screed of cooking up sexually graphic fantasies to anonymously send to other men on the Internet?Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Yikes.
Is Cohen going to flip? It's an insane question to wonder who will "flip" on the president with trump supporters defending their guy by saying certain people won't flip. Kind of misses the bigger point that we shouldn't have elected a guy who brings this discussion to the American people.Quote:
A friend of President Trump's former longtime attorney Michael Cohen said Tuesday that Cohen is considering providing information to investigators about Trump's activities and business dealings.
CNN reports that one of Cohen's friends, who went unnamed in the article due to being in current contact with Cohen, said that he is "willing to give" information on Trump and his business to investigators with Robert Mueller's special counsel office.
"He knows a lot of things about the president and he's not averse to talking in the right situation," the source told CNN. "If they want information on Trump, he's willing to give it."
http://thehill.com/homenews/administ...mpression=true
About time we start seeing some action on this. While Strozk is now a name known nationwide, Rudy's gleeful teasing of the October surprise has been able to remain out of the spotlight.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...d6c16c7acca?frQuote:
Rudy Giuliani Says FBI Questioned Him On Leaks That Hurt Clinton Campaign
Trump’s lawyer says he talked with two FBI agents in his suite at the Trump International Hotel in D.C.
Yea, you missed it? Here's the thread where he was outted.
http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthrea...light=fox+news
It reminds me of how much I miss Dar.. who posted as Tea & Strumpets.
So.. you agree that your assertion of "it was only for 3 days" is way off... by a factor of 30. Good, at least we're getting somewhere.
Sorry you were too stupid to keep up yet another alt account.
I still laugh at you thinking that literally responding to one of your own posts on another account JUST so you can agree with it doesn't make you look pathetic. Shame is a foreign idea for you, isn't it? Not surprised.
Knowing how upset you are about your red rep gives me joy.Quote:
Nope, I'm afraid that was reserved for this, the day your impotent rage was exposed:
https://i.imgur.com/8gz60Yp.png
You still don't get it. This might be why you are all alone every night and why you have to use the Internet to create a persona that you are more comfortable with. You honestly believe that another man calling you a penis puffing little homo is a come on of sorts. It's not. Sorry.Quote:
If only it were just "calling someone queer." You have a decade-long, established history of sending other men furious, sexually graphic messages on the Internet. Absolutely no mental gymnastics rationalizes the fantasies you spent hours of your life dreaming up. Sorry.
And, unlike you.. my retorts don't have to be dreamed up or take a great deal of my time. I type it out and I'm an extremely fast typer. I know.. you're probably upset by this.
I DO like how you try to insult me by insinuating I'm also gay. So strange. Sounds like wishful thinking on your part. Sorry.. that wish will never come true.
OMG I'M SO OLD!Quote:
"Get some new material" says the guy cherishing a 10-year old screenshot? I was in my early 20's when I did that, and sure, it was stupid. You were in, what, your early 50's when you began your decade-long screed of cooking up sexually graphic fantasies to anonymously send to other men on the Internet?
Yikes.
Yes I am. But guess what little cupcake: At least I'm not queer. :)
Also:
http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e6...3/Assliana.jpg
Of course he doesn't. He rather enjoys it.
There is a reason his name is "Ashliana". That's not a masculine name at all.
http://www.catfishingcaspe.com/wp-co...river-ebro.jpg
https://media1.tenor.com/images/ed84...itemid=4445520
Nope. It wasn't off -- your Alzheimer's-riddled brain simply can't remember the details of a day you've been salivating over for literally a decade. Sorry, Mr. Magoo.
I said literally in my last post that using a second account was stupid. There's that legendary Parkbandit-level reading comprehension at work, isn't it? The kids being held at Trump's concentration camps can apparently speak English better than you can.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
You getting revealed as a deranged bigot with festering mental illness, obsessed with sending other men angry, sexualized imagery you fantasized about for years on end, and called out by dozens of people in that thread, far outweighs whatever "upset" feelings -- which you've once again fantasized -- supposedly caused anyone else.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
You've spent years on end sending angry, sexually explicit messages to other men on the Internet. That's a fact. You were exposed. The system proves you sent those messages. For years. Absolutely none of your mental gymnastics changes that fact. Whatever implications to your sexuality you take from someone pointing out that fact aren't anyone else's problem. You did it. You aren't mentally well.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Your age aside, you are also a self-identifying """"straight"""" man who's spent year after year sending graphic sexual imagery to other men, anonymously, on the Internet. But nice job sidestepping the obvious hypocrisy in telling someone else to "get new material" while, without skipping a beat, drooling over a 10 year-old screenshot -- your single "win" in any of our interactions. Which, tellingly, had absolutely nothing to do with anything that you said.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
* Citation required. In reality, you simply had a problem with a man daring to tell you that you're a scumbag for trying to tell women to do with their bodies.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Puhhhlease. I've stated like a hundred times, in different threads, that I'm not a woman.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
That's right, Mr. Magoo. You've must've forgotten, in one of your many mini-strokes, that you're participating in a forum for an online RPG. This would be the character name of my old main, hence the same name on the forum dedicated to the game. Your discomfort with the notion of people playing video game characters of different sexes than they are in real life only reflects on you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
You, like PB, might want to actually look up what that word means at some point. In the meantime:
https://i.imgur.com/MxWls12.png
Lol@your rep
Ok, fine. You only used that account for 3 days... maybe HiV makes math hard for you?
Pathetic isn't the same as stupid. You do know this, right?Quote:
I said literally in my last post that using a second account was stupid. There's that legendary Parkbandit-level reading comprehension at work, isn't it? The kids being held at Trump's concentration camps can apparently speak English better than you can.
Yes, you're very stupid, bordering on retarded. But using a 2nd account to agree with your first account isn't stupid. It's pathetic.
Calling you a faggot is just a fact. Sorry, that's not sexualized for me, no matter how much you wish it were.Quote:
You getting revealed as a deranged bigot with festering mental illness, obsessed with sending other men angry, sexualized imagery you fantasized about for years on end, and called out by dozens of people in that thread, far outweighs whatever "upset" feelings -- which you've once again fantasized -- supposedly caused anyone else.
You've spent years on end sending angry, sexually explicit messages to other men on the Internet. That's a fact. You were exposed. The system proves you sent those messages. For years. Absolutely none of your mental gymnastics changes that fact. Whatever implications to your sexuality you take from someone pointing out that fact aren't anyone else's problem. You did it. You aren't mentally well.
It wasn't a win for me. It was a win for everyone on this message board. You're a fucking lunatic.Quote:
Your age aside, you are also a self-identifying """"straight"""" man who's spent year after year sending graphic sexual imagery to other men, anonymously, on the Internet. But nice job sidestepping the obvious hypocrisy in telling someone else to "get new material" while, without skipping a beat, drooling over a 10 year-old screenshot -- your single "win" in any of our interactions. Which, tellingly, had absolutely nothing to do with anything that you said.
Also, I do enjoy you calling me gay as an insult. How does that even work in your tiny head?
Uh huh. Yea. You can keep your "womb", freak. No one wants anything to do with your body. At all.Quote:
* Citation required. In reality, you simply had a problem with a man daring to tell you that you're a scumbag for trying to tell women to do with their bodies.
Yea.. THAT'S why you pretend on the Internet to be a girl.. because you play one in a text based roleplaying game. No other reasons......Quote:
That's right, Mr. Magoo. You've must've forgotten, in one of your many mini-strokes, that you're participating in a forum for an online RPG. This would be the character name of my old main, hence the same name on the forum dedicated to the game. Your discomfort with the notion of people playing video game characters of different sexes than they are in real life only reflects on you.
lol.
ETA: http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e6...3/Assliana.jpg
I know, PB. It's hard to remember things when you're pushing 70, your brain addled by Alzheimer's and your hillbilly heroin addiction.
Not nearly as pathetic as a 50 year old spending untold hours -- over the course of 15 years -- dreaming up angry, graphic sexual imagery to send other men on the Internet anonymously. But..Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
https://media0.giphy.com/media/38fblIIrHLMPe/giphy.gif
Again, if only it were limited to simply calling someone else names. The reality is that you spent countless hours of your life fantasizing vivid, sexually explicit messages to send to other men. For years.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
"Discovering you posted on two accounts briefly is a huge win for everyone on this message board! You're a fucking lunatic!"Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Are you even reading yourself? Conversely, you and Methais being exposed as the nearly sole-sources of anonymous vitriol on these boards -- that was actually a win for the people on the board. Everybody knows exactly how mentally ill you are, how ugly you are. Shaking with impotent rage at the world, railing at strangers because you can't handle the fact that people who aren't you don't uncritically internalize and parrot right-wing propaganda.
There's that legendary Parkbandit-level reading comprehension at work. Classic. Pointing out the indisputable reality that you've spent more hours of your life sending other men anonymous, sexually explicit material on the Internet than the average West Hollywood twink doesn't equate to "calling you gay as an insult." You're a cliche of a cliche, a conservative who's totally obsessed with homosexuality, and sends vitriol every which way. Why you've spent years of your life doing so is your own retarded business.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Reading comprehension failure #2.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Okay. What other reasons? Those reasons you haven't ever been able to substantiate, or even really articulate? Oh. Yeah. Super convincing, Mr. Magoo.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
I already did (as I have, many times in the past). Reading is hard, I know.
Why are you stupid enough to be a Trump apologist? Some mysteries no one can solve.
In gayese.. 3 days = 3 months.
ok.
Rep came into effect on these boards in 2008. 2018 - 2008= 15. Again.. math is a concept you just aren't good at.Quote:
Not nearly as pathetic as a 50 year old spending untold hours -- over the course of 15 years -- dreaming up angry, graphic sexual imagery to send other men on the Internet anonymously. But..
https://media0.giphy.com/media/38fblIIrHLMPe/giphy.gif
And why don't we go into all the elderly explicit messages you spent countless hours of your life fantasizing about old guys. Sorry faggot, I've already told you many, many times: I'm not interested. Stop begging. #MeToo.
All those countless hours, dreaming and fantasizing about elderly men. For years. You should just go visit lemonparty.. that sounds like your fantasy site.Quote:
Again, if only it were limited to simply calling someone else names. The reality is that you spent countless hours of your life fantasizing vivid, sexually explicit messages to send to other men. For years.
No one cared that you posted on 2 accounts. YOU USED ONE ACCOUNT TO AGREE WITH YOUR SECOND ACCOUNT. THAT IS WHAT MAKES YOU PATHETIC. It was the single most pathetic thing anyone has done on these boards.Quote:
"Discovering you posted on two accounts briefly is a huge win for everyone on this message board! You're a fucking lunatic!"
But hey.. finally found someone that didn't think you were a flaming retard. Good for you!
Methais isn't even on my level bitch. And knowing how upset you get about your rep makes me happy.Quote:
Are you even reading yourself? Conversely, you and Methais being exposed as the nearly sole-sources of anonymous vitriol on these boards -- that was actually a win for the people on the board. Everybody knows exactly how mentally ill you are, how ugly you are. Shaking with impotent rage at the world, railing at strangers because you can't handle the fact that people who aren't you don't uncritically internalize and parrot right-wing propaganda.
You've insinuated that I must be gay because I've called you a queer, faggot, peter puffer, cock snorkler, etc... Sorry.. it doesn't work that way.. anymore than you calling me elderly makes you old. Stop being SO retarded in every single post you make. It's embarrassing.Quote:
There's that legendary Parkbandit-level reading comprehension at work. Classic. Pointing out the indisputable reality that you've spent more hours of your life sending other men anonymous, sexually explicit material on the Internet than the average West Hollywood twink doesn't equate to "calling you gay as an insult." You're a cliche of a cliche, a conservative who's totally obsessed with homosexuality, and sends vitriol every which way. Why you've spent years of your life doing so is your own retarded business.
Why does anyone like you pretend to be someone you are not? Because, let's be honest: Your real life sucks.. you look in the mirror and instead of seeing a cute girl, you see a hairy beast of a man and it pains you everyday you can't really be cute little Ashliana in real life.. so you hunker down in your mom's basement, go online and pretend you aren't pathetic.Quote:
Okay. What other reasons? Those reasons you haven't ever been able to substantiate, or even really articulate? Oh. Yeah. Super convincing, Mr. Magoo.
But.. you are.
Forgot to add this:
http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e6...3/Assliana.jpg
What's that? A conservative? With alternative facts? What a surprise.
# of people surprised you know exactly when rep came about: Zero. Okay, buddy. 2008 it is. So merely a decade of your deranged obsession.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Oh, look. You're indulging in yet more of your fantasies even as you claim the absurdity of you doing so. Sorry, Mr. Magoo. Nobody's hitting on you. You, on the other hand, have sent a decade of furious, sexually explicit messages to other men on the Internet, thinking it was anonymous.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Yet more of your fantasizing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Nope. I'm afraid that your decade of a supposedly "straight" 50-year old sending other men on the Internet sexually explicit imagery that you spent hours dreaming up getting exposed for everyone to see takes the cake.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Methais is marginally less retarded than you are, that's true. Spoiler Alert: Calling you out on your obsession doesn't equal "me being upset," but we know how difficult reasoning is for you -- so nobody's surprised you've fallen back to your "hurr, hurr, t3h lulz made my unhinged behavior defensible" explanation of your mental illness.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Nope. You're back to your patented six year-old level of reading comprehension. As I've told you now three times in a row, it isn't merely "insults." It's the angry, sexually explicit imagery you spent years sending other men on the Internet, anonymously.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
"Why does anybody play roleplaying games," the confused septogenarian Mr. Magoo asks on a forum dedicated to a roleplaying game. Classic.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Sorry Earl, I'm done with the back and forths that you aren't motivated in participating in. :jerkit:
It's true. Every man that calls you a pathetic penis puffer is really attracted to you. It's just a strange coincidence you can't get laid. Might be the fur coat you sport around.
Also:
http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e6...3/Assliana.jpg
Translation: Your surrender. That quote doesn't, and never did, mean that I never participate in back-in-forths. It was a response to the like 10 retarded times you've said "HURRR, WELCOME BACK, IT," as if I've ever left the PC. Lurking -- instead of always participating in these lovely exchanges with your deluded self -- doesn't mean that I've left. The fact that you didn't (and still don't) understand that, and even thought you were somehow scoring points with it by putting it into a signature -- serves as an ongoing testament to your spectacular inability to comprehend your presumably native language. It's a brilliant neon sign showcasing how hilariously clueless you are.
Translation: "If I claim my violent, depraved sexually explicit imagery that I sent to other men anonymously on the Internet was just "calling you a fag" enough times, it'll magically become true!"Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Nope. Sorry, Mr. Magoo. Alternative facts aren't going to save you.
Speaking of reading comprehension, you might want to have another look at that rep poll. I lost that vote tremendously vs. everyone else on there. Not that it matters, as the poll should have been called "Who made you the most butthurt via rep?" But by all means, please keep trying to be like pk while he's busy having his lawyer subpoena IP records from Kranar because his feelings got hurt.
https://i.imgur.com/R9hYIgG.png
Look at you, all grown up and still not knowing how to count. I thought you were a big boy? Beep beep.
Brb, sending you rep with graphic heterosexual imagery.
Seek psychiatric care.
:rofl: Well, older people do tend to skew reactionary (what a coincidence that PB does!) -- so yes, they tend to be shitty. Not all of them, though.
Probably because of the long string of prominent, vitriolically anti-gay conservatives who inevitably get outed as repressed, self-hating basket cases.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
"Straight" guys don't typically spend countless hours over the course of a decade sending other men graphic sexual imagery they dreamed up.
You're right! Full points for you. Thanks for spending the time drawing all those bubbles.
And you either pretended to not understand -- or, in a haze induced by your Alzheimer's/hillbilly heroin addiction, couldn't understand -- that, though you very much wish to characterize your messages as simply insults, the reality is that you spent countless hours of your life sending furious, graphic sexual imagery to other men in fits of impotent rage and deranged obsession.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Your inability to understand that those two things are different surprises no one.
No matter how many times you say it, things like "omg fag" aren't the same thing as the imagery you cooked up, thinking about rectal prolapses, greasy anal discharges, choking oral sex, dicks up assholes, etc. Sorry, Mr. Magoo.