Originally Posted by
Tgo01
So that totally means he's guilty of murder right?! And yet he's the only one on trial. So weird.
My beyond obvious point is it typically isn't wise for the prosecution to call up a witness who openly admits he too was breaking the law that night, especially when it comes to illegally possessing a gun while they are charging the other person for violating gun laws. Just like it would be beyond retarded to call up Rittenhouse as a witness against the one-armed bandit, but let's get real, this maniac will never be charged with a crime because he has the "correct" politics.
I mean...yes? Is this even a fucking real question?
"You're only allowed to protect yourself if you're following the law! Otherwise go ahead and die or be charged with murder!"
Get the fuck outta here. If he wasn't old enough to openly carry then charge him for that.