Well. Who knows what turns up in investigations. Imagine that man having to testify under oath
Printable View
Well. Who knows what turns up in investigations. Imagine that man having to testify under oath
Another shit show.
Even if it turned up both were bad people, they'd ram through a new VP nom before they let Pelosi take over.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
Knowing Democrats they would immediately try to impeach that person too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
All the Dems know that "Hey, we might get an impeachment, but we'll never get a conviction." They are probably thinking it'll make their base see them as people doing what they said they will do or whatever. History isn't usually on the side of people impeaching a President though.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
It's more likely that Nancy is using this to blow up the far left moon bats in her party. I think she dislikes the "squad" more than she dislikes Trump. Nancy can easily say, when this falls apart, "I told you so" to the clowns that are fucking up the democrat image.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
Tulsi Gabbard thinks it is a bad idea.
Supposedly 1/3rd of House Democrats are against the idea.
I'm guessing those are all of the moderate Democrats in swing districts that are going to piss off a lot of their constituents no matter which way they vote.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
Just imagine if the President of the United States directed his VP to create close ties with one of the most corrupt governments on the planet and then that VP worked his own son onto the board of the largest energy firm in said country. And now a new outsider has been elected president of said country that wants to root out and eradicate all corruption there himself.Quote:
Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage
News that he's talking to Trump surfaces, and now Pelosi wants to impeach. Hmm. Why now?
Trump has reportedly caved and decided to release the whistle blower complaint. Hold your breath. Things are moving fast.