Tuesday is Back's drunk day. Gelston generally only gets drunk in the middle of the night.
Printable View
Have you still not realized, despite being specifically told numerous times, that no one here gives a fuck about discussing anything with you, and that your purpose is entertainment?
Tell us which part of this keeps confusing you so much, so that we can help you understand. Because understanding things is tough for you. Which is fine, because that just adds even more to the entertainment.
I'll grant him this: he's VERY good at his delay tactics.
Presumably he's just hoping to delay until after the midterm elections as Trump is unlikely to act before then.
What's interesting about all of this is that those questions clearly covered the dangling of a Pardon to Flynn. You would think that would give Manafort major pause. After all, if Mueller's team is already honing in on the use of the Pardon power to obstruct justice- that would be a powerful disincentive for Trump to Pardon Manafort. But Manafort isn't acting like his odds of a Pardon just went down- which makes me wonder what has him feeling so confident.
That's what is so confounding about his strategy- he's willing to try anything except a plea deal with Mueller's team. And Mueller has demonstrated that his team offers exceptionally generous terms to those who agree to cooperate. At the same time, they already have Gates. Every day there's a risk that Mueller won't need Manafort any longer- which means no plea deal.
He's either got some powerful disincentive for a plea deal, or he's very certain he's going to get a Pardon.
I like this guy..
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said that the Department of Justice “is not going to be extorted” and that he has no response to documents that “nobody has the courage to put their name on” in response to inquiries about the articles of impeachment the House Freedom Caucus is drafting to possibly bring against him.
Special Counsel Robert Mueller on Tuesday requested that sentencing for former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn be delayed by at least two months.
Mueller’s team and attorneys for Flynn submitted that Flynn is not ready for sentencing “due to the status of the special counsel’s investigation,” according to a court filing in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C.
That's great of him to say, but the DoJ already has been successfully extorted several times by House Republicans. They've handed over a lot of documents related to the ongoing investigation. I believe the case law on this has pretty well established that the Executive can't be forced to turn over information that would affect ongoing investigations.
Of course, there is no Judicial review of impeachment proceedings. So there's that.
...
You know that the worst part is? His posts still have more substance than all of the other trolls combined.
That's just a bad look for everyone involved
http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthrea...02#post2022702
Still in denial I see.
It seems like there's something you really want to discuss with me- I see you posting and reposting and trying to get me to engage. And I don't want to be invalidating, but the thing is- you've been replying to A LOT of what I've said over the past few weeks. And it's starting to make it difficult to engage other people in the conversation.
So let's do this. You keep doing what you've been doing- following me around and responding to half of my posts. And that way I won't forget about you, and when I've got a little more time I promise I'll reply to you and make sure you feel like you're an important part of what's going on.
It's going to be okay. I promise!
Don't do it Methais. It's an invitation for her to accuse you of stalking.
https://media2.giphy.com/media/3o6Zt...7Ces/giphy.gif
this is interesting..
In a tense meeting in early March with the special counsel, President Trump’s lawyers insisted he had no obligation to talk with federal investigators probing Russia’s interference in the 2016 presidential campaign.
But special counsel Robert S. Mueller III responded that he had another option if Trump declined: He could issue a subpoena for the president to appear before a grand jury, according to four people familiar with the encounter.
Mueller’s warning — the first time he is known to have mentioned a possible subpoena to Trump’s legal team — spurred a sharp retort from John Dowd, then the president’s lead lawyer.
“This isn’t some game,” Dowd said, according to two people with knowledge of his comments. “You are screwing with the work of the president of the United States.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...=.116148ebd8ce
I don't believe he gave a list at all. At least the list wasn't leaked.
He did. It wasn't a physical list- the list we saw was written by Jay Sekulow based on what he was told by Mueller. (His legal team definitely leaked this)
Now I see what you were saying.
Yeah it's prep based on what Mueller said. But the fact that Mueller gave them a heads up of what to expect was definitely them anticipating a subpoena request.
Which also means this investigation is going to go on for quite a while longer.
Looks like WaPo is confirming that the questions were leaked with the goal of making the case that Mueller has gone beyond his reach.
So Trump threw a fit on Twitter today to cover the fact that he and his lawyers intentionally leaked this to attack Mueller.
And it actually just makes Trump look really guilty.
You know life may be easier for you regarding everything Trump if you took this approach.
http://a.fod4.com/misc/darth%20vader%20fuck.gif
Typical WH employees for this administration. Might as well put his team of lawyers on the NSC.Quote:
Donald Trump’s current team of lawyers lacks the security clearances needed to discuss sensitive issues related to a possible presidential interview with Special Counsel Robert Mueller, according to two people familiar with the matter.
Trump’s former lead lawyer John Dowd had been the only member of the president’s personal legal team with a security clearance, the people said. When Dowd quit in March over disagreements with Trump on legal strategy, Jay Sekulow became the lead lawyer on the investigation and is still waiting for his clearance.
https://www.bloomberg.com/amp/news/a...mpression=true
How true this is.
Ever since the weather has become better there has been this dude that stands out in front of city hall holding a sign, the sign says "We need a leader!" that's all it says. He's usually there 2 or 3 times a week, on Thursdays it seams, a smaller group of protesters join him. They do it right in the middle of afternoon rush hour so it's a bit difficult to get a good glimpse of what all the signs say or what the fuck they are even protesting about.
When they first popped up I thought to stop and see what all the hoopla was about but, fuck that, I don't care enough to try to mess with the traffic. Then after a couple weeks of seeing this same dude with the same fucking sign, it kind of dawned on me "Come on, WTF sign dude?" You're out here at least 10 hours a week, every time you're out here it bottlenecks the traffic, because nobody can help themselves to slow down and watch the retarded sign dude. Now all I can think when I drive by is what other positive things this idiot could do with this time and energy, like perhaps coaching little league, helping at a shelter, Big Brother, Teen Challenge.............the fucking list is endless or start your own org. But no, he's pissing away his time and energy in search of the political jesus.
This is bound to continue to be a negative spiral for those that let it be. I couldn't imagine a life where I wake up and the first thing that fills my thoughts is President Trump.
Lets be honest, your opinion matters to politicians once every four years.
I'm not the one holding up a sign asking for a leader 10 hours a week. I don't wake up every morning not accepting the outcome of an election that took place almost 2 years ago. I come here because it makes me laugh, not because I care about politics. It's like playing with muppets. You guys are like abnormally obsessed with your loss.
Donald Trump’s current team of lawyers lacks the security clearances needed to discuss sensitive issues related to a possible presidential interview with Special Counsel Robert Mueller, according to two people familiar with the matter.
Trump’s former lead lawyer John Dowd had been the only member of the president’s personal legal team with a security clearance, the people said. When Dowd quit in March over disagreements with Trump on legal strategy, Jay Sekulow became the lead lawyer on the investigation and is still waiting for his clearance.
"Billionaire" in DC can't get a lawyer with a security clearance. Sad.
It's a good thing Republicans have moved on right?
Republicans ran 13,000 ads against Hillary Clinton — this year
http://theweek.com/speedreads/770950...-clinton--year
That would require them to actually have a life outside of hating Trump.
I mostly troll on here to pass time while I’m at work, but I can check the PC at pretty much any time of day and more likely than not, the 4 failures are still going back and forth, desperately clinging onto anything said about Trump and trying to figure out a way to make it mean that Trump’s going down.
“This isn’t looking good for Trump” is usually how the posts end, just before nothing happens. Then the cycle repeats and it will probably be like this for the next 7 years, unless one of them snaps first and shoots up Simucon or something because they’re still not getting their way over the 2016 election results.
He hires all the best people wolff.
Besides, security clearances come from the DoJ. And the DoJ is ruled by a secretive Deep State that's out to take Trump down and not, as people have argued, by people Trump appointed.
They work with the liberal media, who has also co-opted fact checking sites to try to trick people into believing liberal conspiracies like "the rule of law".
And that's why Hillary Clinton must be stopped.
Ty Cobb is out. He'll be replaced by Emmet Flood, who was Clinton's impeachment lawyer.
This gives us an idea of where they think this is all headed.
Flood is taking Cobb's position as lawyer for the WH, meaning he doesn't have to worry about Trump not paying him. Also, this tweet did not age well..
https://i.imgur.com/hZ2tlZS.jpg
The irony of you saying “low energy” to literally anyone else on the planet is :lol:
Sorry that it hurts your feelings so much that you idiots aren’t worth the time of digging through a 300+ page thread for some quotes of stupidity. I hear cry closets are a thing now though, so at least you’ll have a new outlet.
Getting back on topic, Cambridge Analytica and its parent group SCL have been shut down.
All signs point to looming action by the President to stop the Russia investigation.
Quote:
WASHINGTON — President Trump has hired Emmet T. Flood, the veteran Washington lawyer who represented Bill Clinton during his impeachment, to replace Ty Cobb, the White House lawyer who has taken the lead in dealing with the special counsel investigation and has decided to retire, according to two people briefed on the matter.
More...
Quote:
Mr. Flood is expected to take a more adversarial approach to the investigation than Mr. Cobb, who had pushed Mr. Trump to strike a cooperative tone.
Do you honestly believe that anyone here would expect you to honor any bets you lost? This is aside from the fact that you've been begging us for months to give you 5m to fuck off. Which I'm sure at least one person would have coughed up if they had any expectation at all that you would honor it.
Fixed.
It's not all bad news. Maybe this explains why trump is freaking the fuck out on twitter.
Quote:
Representative Ron DeSantis (R., Fla.), who’s running for governor, asks on Twitter, “What the heck does the ‘Access Hollywood’ tape have to do with Russia collusion? This investigation is a fishing expedition!” 4/11/18 National Review
Quote:
Michael Caputo, just interviewed by Bob Mueller’s team, told me: “It’s clear they are still really focused on Russia collusion. ... They know more about the Trump campaign than anyone who ever worked there.” He didn’t want to discuss specifics
...
He added: ”The Senate and the House are net fishing,” Caputo said. “The special counsel is spearfishing. They know what they are aiming at and are deadly accurate.”
Um...the Trump administration appears to have bribed Ukraine to drop their cases against Manafort, stop cooperating with Mueller, and to let Manafort's business partner with Russian intelligence connections (the one mentioned in the recent court filings) flee to Russia. (He had previously been stuck in Ukraine under investigation)
He also got up in front of the country and said Trump reimbursed Cohen for the payment.
Despite Trump having repeatedly denied even knowing about it.
It's possible that this affects the campaign finance violation issue. It would still be illegal (I'm pretty sure anyway?), but it potentially opens up an argument on Trump's part that he remedied the situation immediately. Trump is allowed to give however much he wants to his own campaign.
But if this doesn't make the campaign finance violation go away, then Trump is now culpable.
Regardless- this was definitely not an accident.
Okay did some research on this.
Updated: I think I figured this out. The argument is going to be that Cohen gave Trump a personal loan as his lawyer, in his professional capacity. It's then incumbent upon the Prosecutor to prove- beyond a reasonable doubt- that this was done purely to help Trump with his campaign. As a gift, that's a REALLY easy case to make. No one just "gives" $130k to someone a few days before a campaign to make something go away. And if it's a gift- it's almost impossible to make the case that the communications revolving around the payment are covered by attorney-client privilege.
Loans are still illegal campaign contributions if they're given for the campaign, but if this is a personal loan given in the capacity as the candidate's lawyer then it's potentially a different story. Personal loans to a candidate- even from a political supporter- aren't actually illegal. It's a gaping loophole. And if they argue it was done in the capacity as his lawyer, then there's an argument to be made that all relevant communcation about it between the two (the communication you would almost certainly need to prove this was a campaign contribution) are then covered by attorney-client privilege and therefore are off-limits to the Prosecutors and the investigators.
It's a potentially risky strategy as the crime-fraud exemption is arguably in play, and it opens Trump up to campaign violation charges (and there's no protection for crimes committed before you enter Office) But they may be banking on the fact that the Prosecutors won't have enough evidence- absent the privileged communications- to convince the Judge of that fact.
~Robert CostaQuote:
Giuliani tells me he just spoke w / POTUS. Tonight by phone. President "very pleased," Giuliani says. He says they discussed his revelation of the reimbursements long in advance. Does not expect to be fired. Insists his remarks on FNC were approved by Trump. Story TK.
Sounds like the Trump camp is preparing for an indictment on Kushner because Rudy G called him disposable but that Mueller would be crossing a red line if he went after Ivanka.
Isn't that some shit? Rudy used to be America's Mayor. A law and order guy with a good reputation. He's going to finish his professional life as the face of this weird criminal organization, attacking U.S. law enforcement and defending a shitbird like trump. Some will cheer his robust defense of the trump family. To me, it's a shame to see and a disgraceful end to a great career.
I certainly hope we have subpoenas. If congress is supposed to exercise oversight then they should. The only reason they've not issued subpoenas already, or enforced their authority to investigate, is because of pure partisan politics. As cynical as I am about these things some times it's still alarming to see something like the House Intelligence Committee used as a purely political instrument.Quote:
Paul Ryan Warns If Republicans Lose House, Cover-ups Will End Paul Ryan appeared at a financial conference to warn that, if Democrats win control of either the House or the Senate in the November elections, “you’ll have gridlock, you’ll have subpoenas.”
There's a thin blue line in the DOJ keeping the dictator at bay and these guys are doing everything they can to break that line and easily 1/3 of the country is cheering it on. See, they don't need to send cops to come take your guns before overrunning the country. They're doing it out in the open with the full throated support of the very people who claim to be the most resistant to tyranny.
Quote:
Giuliani’s FBI ‘Stormtroopers’ Smear Is the Key to Trump’s Authoritarian Mind-set
The potential for abuse in turning law enforcement into a weapon of the party that controls government is so terrifying that any democracy has to limit it. For decades, federal law enforcement has observed a series of norms, codified after Watergate, designed to wall it off from partisan considerations. The system hasn’t worked perfectly — it broke down in 2016, when James Comey violated FBI policy and announced one of the candidates was under federal investigation. Comey was attempting to placate Republican demands that the Bureau put more pressure on Clinton, and — assuming she would win — tried to head off postelection recriminations. It was a disastrous miscalculation. But many leading Democrats afforded him some measure of absolution for his error because they respected the norm he was attempting, however clumsily, to defend.
Republicans are now engaged in a concerted effort to break down these protections altogether. Trump and his allies in Congress have repeatedly demanded that the Department of Justice ramp up their investigation of Trump’s opponents and ease up or stop the investigation of Trump’s campaign collusion with Russia. Republicans in Congress have made a series of demands that Rod Rosenstein, the acting attorney general, turn over a wide array of documents related to the Russia probe. The Department of Justice has customarily walled off active investigations from congressional involvement, but Rosenstein (like Comey) has been trying to appease Republicans by giving them unusual access to his evidence.
This makes sense especially considering that they just added the impeachment lawyer. They won't go quietly but it does seem we've entered the next phase of this thing.Quote:
@HoarseWisperer
Giuliani is trying to thread the needle by acknowledging exactly what went down while excusing both Michael Cohen and Trump from criminal wrongdoing.
That means the Trump camp has fully accepted the Feds know everything and all there is left to do is position for a legal fight.
https://media1.giphy.com/media/26n6z...wBkQ/giphy.gif
You're also an effeminate little mall girl drama queen.
Methais is turned on by effeminate men.
I heard you were pretty obese and while that is a perfectly acceptable lifestyle choice it's not for me.
It's okay to come out of the closet Methais, we won't judge you. Otherwise your continued against just make you look like a raging bigot.
This looks interesting.
Quote:
(CN) – Special Counsel Robert Mueller on Thursday filed a request for 70 blank subpeonas in the Virginia court presiding over one of two criminal proceedings involving former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort.
This story is developing …
looks like necro got rekt again :lol:
He'll be back.
He wants his two dollars.
https://i.makeagif.com/media/3-27-2015/LNUpHf.gif
Good perspective on the investigation.Quote:
@matthewjdowd
As i said on @ThisWeekABC to give some perspective: “Benghazi was a 4 year investigation, there were zero indictments. The Clinton emails was a 2 year investigation, there were zero indictments. The Mueller investigation has been 14 months, there have been 23 indictments.”
One would think the flag waving MAGA people would be absolutely in a rage over the Russian interference but no. Not at all. They will freak the fuck out about people sneaking over here to do your landscaping or work at the meat packing plant, but a government running ops against us is no big deal as long at trump doesn't rage tweet it.Quote:
Ricketts was one of five military wives who received death threats from the self-styled CyberCaliphate on the morning of Feb. 10, 2015. The warnings led to days of anguished media coverage of Islamic State militants’ online reach.
Except it wasn’t IS.
The Associated Press has found evidence that the women were targeted not by jihadists but by the same Russian hacking group that intervened in the American election and exposed the emails of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign chairman, John Podesta.
What's the deal with this tweet from Avenatti?
Here's a link to his notes about Cohen. It's short, speculative and interesting especially if you think trump and his crew are basic run of the mill criminals playing on a big stage. https://www.dropbox.com/s/pskgpwr15r...mmary.pdf?dl=0Quote:
After significant investigation, we have discovered that Mr. Trump’s atty Mr. Cohen received approximately $500,000 in the mos. after the election from a company controlled by a Russian Oligarc with close ties to Mr. Putin. These monies may have reimbursed the $130k payment.
We are way too slow in reacting to this stuff. The news comes out in drips and each drip is a little worse than previously thought.Quote:
http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecur...r-campaign?ampSenate Intel: Russia waged ‘unprecedented’ cyber campaign on U.S. voting systems
“In a small number of states, Russian-affiliated cyber actors were able to gain access to restricted elements of election infrastructure,” the report states. “In a small number of states, these cyber actors were in a position to, at a minimum, alter or delete voter registration data; however, they did not appear to be in a position to manipulate individual votes or aggregate vote totals.”
The committee also found, through its investigation, that Russia conducted intelligence gathering and other “intelligence-related activities” before the 2016 vote likely in preparation for discrediting the integrity of the U.S. voting process. The report provides few details on this activity, or an explanation of why the committee came to the conclusion about the motive behind it.
Because the committee’s findings are based on information from the states, the report emphasizes that it is possible more states were attacked but that the activity was not detected — echoing a point made by a top Homeland Security official just last month.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_k_wKzcbAeM
P.S. This is one of the very few times, if ever, that a communist gives praise to decentralization.Quote:
There is no serious person out there who would suggest somehow that...you could...you could even rig America's elections. ~ Barack Hussein Obama 10/18/2016
Just answer the question.
It's obviously a question that you know you can't answer because your position is based in racism. Do I need to post the video once again where black people think it's racist that you idiots make these retarded assumptions?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrBxZGWCdgs
Too late. Face it, you're a racist.
Nunes is trying to get his hands on more classified material and DOJ doesn't want to set this precedent. If Nunes gets it, then it will leak and people might get killed. We burn another intelligence source and further alienate our allies. I hope he pays a price for all this meddling when it's all said and done.Quote:
“They are citing spurious national security concerns to evade congressional oversight while leaking information to The Washington Post ostensibly about classified meetings,” he said in a statement to The Post. “Congress has a right and a duty to get this information and we will succeed in getting this information, regardless of whatever fantastic stories the DOJ and FBI spin to the Post.”
Several administration officials said they fear Trump may reverse course and support Nunes's argument.
In other news trump was incapable of answering 2 questions w/in 4 hours during a mock interview that his legal beagles set up. He's too loquacious. He really should get a meeting with Mueller. He can spend hours upon hours speaking in circles.
Quote:
President Trump’s preparations for a potential interview with Special Counsel have not exactly been going smoothly, according to a Monday Wall Street report, which detailed the difficulty the President had making it through a mock interview:
In an informal, four-hour practice session, Mr. Trump’s lawyers were only able to walk him through two questions, given the frequent interruptions on national-security matters along with Mr. Trump’s loquaciousness, one person familiar with the matter said.
Trump’s lawyers have set a May 17 deadline — the one-year anniversary of Mueller’s appointment — to decide whether the President should sit down for questioning by the special counsel, the Journal reported. If Trump decides not to grant Mueller a voluntary interview, it could prompt the special counsel to subpoena him, escalating a legal battle.
Sally Yates testified before congress 1 year ago. If only trump had taken some advice and not hired Flynn and then fired him and comey none of this investigation would have happened. It's been less than a year and dozens of indictments, 4 convictions and this thing is still ramping up.
Also one year ago:Quote:
1. Flynn lied about Russia, and it opened him up to potential blackmail from Russia
2. What (or whether) the White House did anything with this information is unclear
3. Republicans are almost single-handedly focused on HOW we know Flynn talked with the Russian ambassador
4. Republicans are also really mad at Yates for not defending Trump's travel ban
5. Democrats are pretty sure there's more to the Trump-Russia story than Flynn
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.f073412ae477
”Quote:
President Donald Trump weighed firing his FBI director for more than a week. When he finally pulled the trigger Tuesday afternoon, he didn’t call James Comey. He sent his longtime private security guard to deliver the termination letter in a manila folder to FBI headquarters.
He had grown enraged by the Russia investigation, two advisers said, frustrated by his inability to control the mushrooming narrative around Russia. He repeatedly asked aides why the Russia investigation wouldn’t disappear and demanded they speak out for him. He would sometimes scream at television clips about the probe, one adviser said.
Trump’s firing of the high-profile FBI director on the 110th day after the president took office marked another sudden turn for an administration that has fired its acting attorney general, national security adviser and now its FBI director, whom Trump had praised until recent weeks and even blew a kiss to during a January appearance.
The news stunned Comey, who saw news of his dismissal on TV while speaking inside the FBI office in Los Angeles. It startled all but the uppermost ring of White House advisers, who said grumbling about Comey hadn’t dominated their own morning senior staff meetings. Other top officials learned just before it happened and were unaware Trump was considering firing Comey. “Nobody really knew,” one senior White House official said. “Our phones all buzzed and people said, ‘What?’
Quote:
May 10, 2017
WASHINGTON — Days before he was fired as F.B.I. director, James B. Comey asked the Justice Department for more prosecutors and other personnel to accelerate the bureau’s investigation into Russia’s interference in the presidential election.
It was the first clear-cut evidence that Mr. Comey believed the bureau needed more resources to handle a sprawling and highly politicized counterintelligence investigation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7F7eRM1oiU
Shut the fuck up retards.
Look how incredibly stupid and full of shit straponwolff is. :lol:
Can we please keep this topic clear of any off topic stuff please?
I really want to know when this Russian collusion case really starts "heating up".
Thank you.
You know the answer to that one. Now what about your secret sources inside Mueller's camp that have told you they haven't found any collusion? Why haven't you gone to Fox News with your insider information?
Sure, at a time when our cybersecurity strategy is absolutely critical.. let's do this!
https://i.imgur.com/YTsdL9Z.jpg
It's like you are a one trick pony and everyone knows that one trick....
https://media1.giphy.com/media/l1KVa...HEti/giphy.gif
Where's the deflection? You constantly acting like collusion is the sole area being investigated, despite being corrected numerous times, is the deflection. So again, for the 3rd time, who's your source inside the special counsel that told you they don't have any evidence?
Remember when people were complaining about the Clinton Foundation being used as a pay2play vehicle for Hillary when she was Secretary of State? And now it's coming out that companies were paying Cohen for access to Trump and it's nothing but crickets from Republicans and their propaganda outlets.
I'll spell this out for you, since you are really, really stupid.
1) Look at the name of the thread: Russia Investigation Heating Up.
2) I stated that people should keep their offtopic posts out of here.. since this is for the Russian collusion investigation.
3) You stated that I needed to make another topic.
4) I asked you to be specific and name another investigation that involved Russia and this Administration.
5) You couldn't, so you deflected as predicted.
6) Stop being stupid.
1. Name of thread: Russia Investigation
2. You telling anyone to stay on topic here is a fucking riot considering how much you attempt to derail with your trolling.
3. Yes, make a thread solely on collusion, since that is all you're capable of discussing regarding the investigation, which isn't solely looking at collusion.
4. See 3.
5. Only one deflecting is you. You still haven't answered my question I've asked 3 times. Why? Because you can't. Because the special counsel hasn't finished their investigation nor have they shared what they've uncovered or have been told by the multiple people that have flipped and are now cooperating.
6. Says the troll.
Special Counsel has interviewed Erik Prince recently.
well, for one, the Clintons don't run the Clinton Foundation. It's a public Foundation. Which Russian ties are these exactly?
Meanwhile, the Trump Foundation is a private foundation which IS run by Trump. And it had to be shut down because it was being used illegally.
False equivalence. Just because you can string a sentence together with "Clinton" and "Foundation" doesn't mean it's the same sentence you'd get when you string "Trump" and "Foundation" together.
Facts don't matter.
https://media2.giphy.com/media/3og0I...HWTu/giphy.gif
Of the board. They help raise money for the Foundation. That's what a board does.
They aren't involved in running the day-to-day operations of the Clinton Foundation. Which- again- is a public Foundation.
There are about 20 people in leadership roles who run the actual Foundation.
Viktor Vekselberg, the primary investor for Columbus Nova. He's also tied to U1.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.for...americans/amp/
https://i.imgur.com/vx2R8Fl.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/3lmdeLD.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/ebw9kMB.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/tlWhMUq.jpg
Not sure if you are being your usual willfully ignorant or this is really you being stupid again. It's a 50/50 shot.
Now I know you've probably been Board President or Board CEO of an equally large Foundation.. but let's pretend for a moment you haven't come up with that storyline yet.
Do you believe that if Bill Clinton said to whatever puppet he has set up as the leader of his foundation "Um, we're taking this money from this questionable source and we're going to be using it for this reason. You don't need to worry about it because that money will be in and out before you have any problems", that the puppet won't just be like "Ok Mr. Clinton. By the way, thanks again for giving me this job!"
In your fairy tale version, you would have the CEO basically telling Bill Clinton or Hillary Clinton to fuck off.. that they run the Clinton Foundation and that they are above any shady Clinton shit that he may be trying to pull.
Remember the Rosneft stuff? Avenatti's tweets today referenced that. For those interested Seth Abramson is doing a thread on it here.
https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/sta...53600554405889
Quote:
@SethAbramson
25/ So Steele's dossier gets another ringing endorsement; thus far not a word of it has been proven false—and a majority of it has been confirmed. Now we know why Mueller wanted Papadopoulos, Flynn and Gates. And why he's gunning for Cohen. He seems to have Trump checkmated. /end
PS/ When Papadopoulos, Flynn and Gates got sweetheart deals, Trump shills like Alan Dershowitz said the deals were proof Mueller had nothing. I said the opposite: the deals were proof the men who got those deals had *everything* on Trump. More and more it's clear that's the case.
Being an anti Putin Russian is seriously bad for your healthQuote:
BREAKING: Elena Gremina, writer of play One Hour Eighteen Minutes about the murder of Sergei Magnitsky, found dead in Moscow at the age of 61. This is 6 weeks after her husband Mikhail Ugarov director of same play died. ‘Heart attacks’ in both cases https://t.co/kyitAAJ85C
There is rock solid evidence of collusion. We don't know who else will be charged or how high it goes but collusion's been proven.
The Hillary conspiracies are just that; conspiracy theory.
The discussion we're having now is more akin to debating the existence of God than dealing with reality. You all have to accept that Hillary is not the wicked witch of Little Rock but just a politician like any other.