Well, except for Tesla and SpaceX I guess. He has thousands of patents.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
Printable View
Well, except for Tesla and SpaceX I guess. He has thousands of patents.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
100k bitches
"I have money, you Nazis! No really, I do have money, you fucking bigots!"Quote:
Originally Posted by SHAFT
You sure do seem to think you have a lot to prove to a bunch of people who you deem to be Hitler.
Also be sure to thank Trump.
You think bitcoin needed trump to get to 100k? ��Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Are you delusional, high or sub 70 iq? Combination of all? That would make sense.
I’ll check back with you when we cross 1m.
https://media1.giphy.com/media/QQLPm...giphy.gif&ct=gQuote:
Originally Posted by SHAFT
https://media2.giphy.com/media/lPMSx...d=200.gif&ct=g
If you believe he had nothing to do with the 30% gains since the election, you're retarded. Trump actually has a pro policy concerning crypto currencies, unlike Biden and Harris.Quote:
Originally Posted by SHAFT
Here's from his platform:
Republicans will end Democrats’ unlawful and unAmerican Crypto crackdown and oppose the creation of a Central Bank
Digital Currency. We will defend the right to mine Bitcoin, and ensure every American has the right to self-custody of their
Digital Assets, and transact free from Government Surveillance and Control.
Here is from the Harris platform:
It was literally a running joke at your expense.. that since you claim you are a one issue voter and Trump is pro-crypto.. then you must be voting for Trump.
But you were just too retarded to vote correctly for your one issue.
So we did.
You're welcome.
Retard.
That you don't is the irony.Quote:
Originally Posted by SHAFT
I bet Shaft believes that Paul Pelosi making millions on perfectly timed stock trades has absolutely nothing to do with being married to Nancy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Because Twitter created Bsky before Musk bought Twitter.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c8dm0ljg4y6o
So? Do you...do you understand how this all works? Of course you don't.Quote:
Originally Posted by ClydeR
Speaking of Bluesky, you might have seen a lot of articles written lately (like the dumb one Clyder linked to) talking about how fast Bluesky is growing and how it is going to be a real competitor to X, you know, just like they did with the failed Mastadon project and the mega Facebook failure of Threads.
Well Bluesky peaked at a daily active user count of roughly 1.5 million users, yesterday their daily active user count was 1.2 million, a drop of 20%. Also at the current rate Bluesky is growing they are looking at adding about 45 million accounts in a year, keep in mind probably more than half of these users will use the app once, maybe for a week, then never use the app again. But let's be generous and say 80% of these people will become active monthly users, that's roughly 36 million active users they will gain a year.
X has over 600 million monthly active users, meaning at the current rate (and keep in mind it looks like they have already peaked and are now on a downward slope) it would take over 17 years for Bluesky to outperform X. Almost 250 million people use X every single day.
tl;dr: Bluesky will most likely end up being yet another failed social media company (or at least won't ever be a major player in the social media game) even though a bunch of "celebrities" flocked to it and the media all went crazy saying how this is finally the end of X.