Things that made you laugh today (Political Version)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

Well that didn't take long...
Dems at War Over Secret SCOTUS Plot to Oust Sotomayor

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/dems-at-war-over-secret-scotus-plot-to-oust-sotomayor/ar-AA1tKrj4

There's not enough time to do this. There's only 54 days for them to force this through .. and the Republicans can just filibuster until then.

Let's let President Elect Trump nominate a replacement for her.

---

I had no idea she was 70 already.

I don't know how old I thought she was either, but I didn't think it was 70.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Methais

I never mentioned polling when I first asked the question. I was specifically asking about the part where you said she didn't run on a progressive ticket and that she didn't lose because of her policies.

My entire point was to ask if you consider the things I listed as progressive policies, and if not, then what are they, and had nothing to do with how anything polls. You know, since you said she didn't run on a progressive ticket.

Remember when you said she didn't run on a progressive ticket?

^ Pretend that I quoted only that part of your post and deleted the rest if you're still confused. Because this was the only part of the post I was replying to.

You say she didn't run on a progressive ticket, then you just now say that taxing unrealized capital gains can be considered "somewhat progressive," (it's much worse than somewhat progressive but whatever) just after saying she didn't lose because of her policies, when the few policies she did state, unrealized gains especially, would be beyond catastrophic and probably cost her all sorts of potential votes.

TLDR: I wasn't asking about polling, I was asking if you considered the things I listed as progressive, you just now said yes, but not before saying that she didn't run on a progressive ticket and didn't lose because of her policies.

---

Even the TLDR confused him.

Use smaller words and speak to him like he's got the intellectual ability of a 2nd grader.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Methais

I had no idea she was 70 already.

I don't know how old I thought she was either, but I didn't think it was 70.

---

Trump "losing" in 2020 was probably the best thing for the country long term. He would have had to deal with a Democrat Congress and the endless "OMG WE NEED TO IMPEACH HIM BECAUSE WE DON'T LIKE HIM!" and get nothing big done.

Now, we have the WH, the House and the Senate... we need to make this next term "YUGE" and make changes in this country that will last for decades. Hopefully, 2-3 more Supreme Court nominations too.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

Trump "losing" in 2020 was probably the best thing for the country long term. He would have had to deal with a Democrat Congress and the endless "OMG WE NEED TO IMPEACH HIM BECAUSE WE DON'T LIKE HIM!" and get nothing big done.

Now, we have the WH, the House and the Senate... we need to make this next term "YUGE" and make changes in this country that will last for decades. Hopefully, 2-3 more Supreme Court nominations too.

---

And we'd be stuck with Cuck Pence as VP. It was a shitty 4 years, but imo the country as a whole needed a taste of what that shit would be like, and look how much support Trump has now that people have gotten a taste of the commie left, all winning the popular vote on top of everything else, causing retards like shaft to have uncontrollable diarrhea so badly that he still hasn't made it back to the PC for us to make fun of him being an unhinged loser.

Vance > Pence x9999999999999999999999999999999999999^infinity

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Methais

And we'd be stuck with Cuck Pence as VP. It was a shitty 4 years, but imo the country as a whole needed a taste of what that shit would be like, and look how much support Trump has now that people have gotten a taste of the commie left, all winning the popular vote on top of everything else, causing retards like shaft to have uncontrollable diarrhea so badly that he still hasn't made it back to the PC for us to make fun of him being an unhinged loser.

Vance > Pence x9999999999999999999999999999999999999^infinity

---

Exactly. America got a good taste of what Progressive politics is all about.. and no one that had an IQ over 12 liked it.

And I've always disliked Pence... he comes across as a creepy Sunday school teacher that hopes his male students after class so he can show the kids how to kneel properly.

So glad he's no longer in politics as far as being electable. Maybe he should stick to running for HOA President.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

Exactly. America got a good taste of what Progressive politics is all about.. and no one that had an IQ over 12 liked it.

And I've always disliked Pence... he comes across as a creepy Sunday school teacher that hopes his male students after class so he can show the kids how to kneel properly.

So glad he's no longer in politics as far as being electable. Maybe he should stick to running for HOA President.

---

He would need to change his name to Karen.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Methais

I never mentioned polling when I first asked the question. I was specifically asking about the part where you said she didn't run on a progressive ticket and that she didn't lose because of her policies.

My entire point was to ask if you consider the things I listed as progressive policies, and if not, then what are they, and had nothing to do with how anything polls. You know, since you said she didn't run on a progressive ticket.



Remember when you said she didn't run on a progressive ticket? That's what.




^ Pretend that I quoted only that part of your post and deleted the rest if you're still confused. Because this was the only part of the post I was replying to.

You say she didn't run on a progressive ticket, then you just now say that taxing unrealized capital gains can be considered "somewhat progressive," (it's much worse than somewhat progressive but whatever) just after saying she didn't lose because of her policies, when the few policies she did state, unrealized gains especially, would be beyond catastrophic and probably cost her all sorts of potential votes.

TLDR: I wasn't asking about polling, I was asking if you considered the things I listed as progressive, you just now said yes, but not before saying that she didn't run on a progressive ticket and didn't lose because of her policies.

---

you quoted a post from me where I was talking about polling, Methais, and then your next response to me literally asked me about polling. are you purposely being stupid?

but to address your dumb argument - one of the things you mentioned she didn't run on, the tax policy you mentioned she did run on and I would consider progressive, and I'm not sure what you are talking about with 'food price control' thing, unless you're talking about policy to stop price gouging? which we'll assume for the sake of this argument is 'progressive'.

again, even if she ran on those 2 things, so what? she had an entire platform of shit no one cared about or didn't want or wouldn't help anything. my argument that I was having that you decided to join was that she didn't run on a progressive ticket, and she would have done better with voters if she did. i still think she would have lost

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joeyb

you quoted a post from me where I was talking about polling, Methais, and then your next response to me literally asked me about polling. are you purposely being stupid?

but to address your dumb argument - one of the things you mentioned she didn't run on, the tax policy you mentioned she did run on and I would consider progressive, and I'm not sure what you are talking about with 'food price control' thing, unless you're talking about policy to stop price gouging? which we'll assume for the sake of this argument is 'progressive'.

again, even if she ran on those 2 things, so what? she had an entire platform of shit no one cared about or didn't want or wouldn't help anything. my argument that I was having that you decided to join was that she didn't run on a progressive ticket, and she would have done better with voters if she did. i still think she would have lost

---

https://www.enworld.org/media/moving...if.135798/full

I told you, Methais.

parkbandit stop posting

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joeyb

parkbandit stop posting

---

joeyb stop sucking dick.

I would also suggest you stop being retarded and maybe make something out of your life.. but those are clearly out of your control.