Things that made you laugh today (Political Version)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joeyb

i'm talking about her 2024 campaign. you said that she lost because "Kamala & Walz were the most progressive DNC nominees to ever be on the presidential ballot" and that America said no to progressive policies. i'm saying she didn't run on a progressive platform and progressive policies actually poll well in this country and content that she would have done better in the election if she actually had a progressive platform.

you also say that she had progressive policies in 2020, then turned hard right in 2024 because "Progressive woke leftism is dead", but also had a progressive 2024 platform? lol which one is it you stupid fuck?

---

Which progressive policies poll well in this country? And after this last election cycle, you really want to put faith in MSM polling?

She lost because she was part of the coup that unseated the elected nominee, was literally the worst VP in US history and in the matter of days we were told she's so great..

She was painfully bad at just holding a regular conversation so she couldn't do interviews and when she did, she failed miserably at them. She did a complete 180 on most of her policies.

She came across as ill informed and ignorant on most topics.

Like you, she sucked dick to get where she was. Unlike you though, she climbed the ladder and didn't just give it away for free in back alleys.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joeyb

you literally get cooked in every interaction we have you old piece of shit. you also sure post a lot about sucking dick for some reason?

lol you've lived 100 years on this earth parkbandit and it's 2024, it's ok to be gay bro.

also, stop posting.

---

It's ok to be gay... it's just not ok to be a fucking retarded faggot.

Also, stop sucking dick.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joeyb

lol you're bitter that you're old and stupid and get constantly dunked on.

it's ok. the cure for all of your ills is that big "X" on the top corner of your screen

stop posting

---

https://i.makeagif.com/media/8-26-2015/-C7___.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Suppressed Poet

You are correct that she didn’t run a progressive platform in 2024, but you also said before she never had progressive policies. The reason she didn’t run on a progressive platform in 2024 is those policies are unpopular. Nobody (mainstream America) in 2024 wants to ban fracking, or Medicare for all, or universal basic income. If they were popular, she would have campaigned on those issues. What I said is it’s hard to tell if Kamala actually abandoned those policies like she is saying now, or if she is just saying that now to give her a better chance of winning a general election.

Just so we’re clear, you think she lost because not enough lefties that support progressive policies turned out to vote for her? :rofl:

---

i'm talking about in the context of 2024. progressive policies are not unpopular - maternity leave, medicare for all, childcare, increasing min wage, abortion, etc are all things that poll very well.

you said what I quoted you said, that she and Walz ran on a progressive ticket, which they obviously didn't. read my post - I never said she lost because of her policies. what I did say is that I think she would have done better.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

It's ok to be gay... it's just not ok to be a fucking retarded faggot.

Also, stop sucking dick.

---

stop posting

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joeyb

i'm talking about in the context of 2024. progressive policies are not unpopular - maternity leave, medicare for all, childcare, increasing min wage, abortion, etc are all things that poll very well.

you said what I quoted you said, that she and Walz ran on a progressive ticket, which they obviously didn't. read my post - I never said she lost because of her policies. what I did say is that I think she would have done better.

---

How about unrealized capital gains taxes, taxpayer funded sex change surgeries for retards, and price controls for food? What do you consider those to be if they're not "progressive?"

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Methais

How about unrealized capital gains taxes, taxpayer funded sex change surgeries for retards, and price controls for food? What do you consider those to be if they're not "progressive?"

---

Those are all retarded policies.

taxing billionaires polls well and has bipartisan support. for the second, i'm guessing you mean for inmates? i have no idea how that polls and I don't know what third one is but doesn't sound like a leftist policy.

also, i'm not saying that every leftist or progressive policy polls well. i'm sure the abolishing of landlords isn't a very popular stance, however, I think since Bernie ran the Overton window has shifted a lot and many things are now popular, like the things I listed.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joeyb

taxing billionaires polls well and has bipartisan support. for the second, i'm guessing you mean for inmates? i have no idea how that polls and I don't know what third one is but doesn't sound like a leftist policy.

also, i'm not saying that every leftist or progressive policy polls well. i'm sure the abolishing of landlords isn't a very popular stance, however, I think since Bernie ran the Overton window has shifted a lot and many things are now popular, like the things I listed.

---

I disagree on a progressive tax system or robbing from billionaires. Maybe where we can find common ground…

Democrats need to go populist, but they are burdened by the control of the elite establishment. A huge part of Trump’s appeal is he is the anti-establishment candidate. If Democrats had somebody that didn’t answer to the Pelosis, Clintons, Obamas, etc. that we all know quietly pull all the strings, that may help.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Suppressed Poet

I disagree on a progressive tax system or robbing from billionaires. Maybe where we can find common ground…

Democrats need to go populist, but they are burdened by the control of the elite establishment. A huge part of Trump’s appeal is he is the anti-establishment candidate. If Democrats had somebody that didn’t answer to the Pelosis, Clintons, Obamas, etc. that we all know quietly pull all the strings, that may help.

---

They shit on Bobby Kennedy so no, it didn't really help.