And here you are arguing that one person's hearsay is more credible than another's. Dumb dumb dumb.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaps
Printable View
And here you are arguing that one person's hearsay is more credible than another's. Dumb dumb dumb.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaps
YOU.. ARE.. A.. FUCKING.. MORON.Quote:
Originally Posted by Seran
Hearsay is someone that HEARD someting.
Eyewitness account (the two that were actually there) is 100% more credible than hearsay.
You have to be trolling... How do you make it through a day being so fucking ignorant. Seriously.
Not saying her story is correct, but until they say it under oath...it really has no weight.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaps
And this is why they do it.. for people like you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
Both people she claims "told her" about it, have already testified in front of the panel twice. No mention of anything at all. They've already said they are willing to return to testify again... and now the panel is not sure they will make their testimony public.
All they have to do is make an allegation, regardless if it's true or not, and they know enough ignorant people will believe the sensationalized account over fact.
Mission accomplished.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaps
Much of what she said was double hearsay. For example, she reported that Meadows told her that Meadows heard Trump say something. Double hearsay should be viewed very skeptically, not necessarily because you think the witness is lying but because pass-the-story testimony is inherently risky.
Her testimony might not stand up in a court case, but unless actual eyewitnesses honor subpoenas and testify under oath, her account will likely be the account that most of the country believes. I have to wonder if the public Hutchinson hearing was designed to pressure actual eyewitnesses to testify.
Perhaps a secret service agent will testify that Trump did not attempt to grab the steering wheel. An issue will then be why Tony Ornato told Hutchinson that Trump tried to grab the steering wheel. Perhaps Ornato will testify under oath about that matter. If eyewitness are willing to appear to contradict that point, why won't they appear to contradict other more important points raised by Hutchinson? The implication will be that the only point she had wrong was about grabbing the steering wheel.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...nder_oath.html
"CNN: Secret Service Agents Willing To Dispute Cassidy Hutchinson's Trump SUV Allegation Under Oath"
"CNN: Officials from the US Secret Service have announced that [former Trump Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations] Tony Ornato and [Secret Service agent] Bobby Engel, the agents named in Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony, are willing to testify before the Jan. 6 committee and dispute Hutchinson's account of an alleged incident involving then-President Trump."
Keep in mind... both of these guys had already testified.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...tified-mystery
"Two key figures from the Secret Service mentioned in the Jan. 6 committee hearing on Tuesday have already testified to investigators on the panel, but questions remain about what they have said behind closed doors."
As said...
That's the thing...when someone like Seran has absolutely zero self awareness, they're totally clueless as to how monumentally stupid they are.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaps
Seran legit thinks he's outsmarting everyone here, even though 99% of his posts are just him copy & pasting some other retard's words, which are also factually incorrect and full of stupid, because he doesn't understand what most of the words he uses actually mean or has a clue how to think for himself. The butthurt buzzwords he uses changes at the exact same pace as the media that's telling him what to think and say.
He can disprove this by telling us what abstinence is and how republicans are trying to block it.
Seran will respond to this after he consults his TV to receive the latest patch.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaps
When your "key witness" continuously uses the phrase "to the effect of" when recounting conversations she heard second hand... it makes her sound extremely unreliable as an actual witness.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
How is anyone even taking hearsay seriously?
The Democrats have made an absolute mockery of justice in this country. But they aren't fully to blame, it's people like Alfster, Seran, and time4fun cheering this dumb shit on that are to blame.