Age of Marijuana Use and Psychosis

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by leifastagsweed

I didn't quote you in particular for a reason, Latrin, and I believe I already called you out specifically on your divine belief in figures. I do feel that there is a general fear that feeds this discussion, however.

---

You referring to people who are worried about any additional regulations because reasons?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tgo01

You referring to people who are worried about any additional regulations because reasons?

---

Clearly you have missed ALL my posts. Herpa derp.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rofj9M5owGI

Quote:

---

Reactions to Jon Snow trying Skunk while studies are linking it to an increased risk of psychosis.

---

Russell Brand is here to reason this out. I think he probably follows the PC.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by leifastagsweed

Clearly you have missed ALL my posts. Herpa derp.

---

I asked for clarification on your post. Chill.

Why is everyone so hostile in a thread about weed?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tgo01

I asked for clarification on your post. Chill.

Why is everyone so hostile in a thread about weed?

---

I am completely not hostile. I'm quite docile, in fact! However, you might call my retort 'reactionary' or 'frustrated' at the need to go back and remind you of my position on regulation. In fact, my last post in this thread was a link to details about said position. lrn2rd before you troll?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Latrinsorm

Ah, do tell! I assume you are not going to for reasons that remain unclear, and I further assume that you are referring to the fact that the majority of schizophrenia occurs between the ages of 15 and 25. That is a fact! But "majority" doesn't mean "all"; in fact, I found one source that attests the distribution is bimodal, and in fact increases from age 25 to age 30. It also turns out that marijuana use beyond the age of 25 still causes schizophrenia. Ask this Dr. Jensen (whoever they are) to their face whether they have ever tested that hypothesis. See if their eyes can convince you of the truth.

---

It's fine that you're a Creationist. They make pretenses to scientific understanding too. I think the head of an Ivy League neuroscience department might actually outgun your entry in the Mark Twain PHD race.

See, that's the thing in the end. I did my research and came to a well reasoned conclusion. You've come to a conclusion and then constantly worked on your research.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Warriorbird

See, that's the thing in the end. I did my research and came to a well reasoned conclusion. You've come to a conclusion and then constantly worked on your research.

---

THIS!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Androidpk

It's funny that the people railing against marijuana are the ones who've never tried it.

---

Which isn't surprising. At all.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54xWo7ITFbg

I also missed the post a few pages back about overdosing on pot.

There's no such thing as overdosing on pot. There is such a thing as not being able to handle your shit, but that isn't the same as overdosing.

Overdosing typically involves things like permanent damage and/or risk of death. Like what happens with real drugs.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by leifastagsweed

I am completely not hostile. I'm quite docile, in fact! However, you might call my retort 'reactionary' or 'frustrated' at the need to go back and remind you of my position on regulation. In fact, my last post in this thread was a link to details about said position. lrn2rd before you troll?

---

You're hostile/not hostile because I didn't read all of your posts on this subject and couldn't decipher your other post to know exactly what you were referring to? :/

I think everyone in this thread is suffering from psychosis!

I'm not sure where hostility even comes into play?

I'll just leave this here:

https://beefyhouse.files.wordpress.c...its-patent.jpg