You think that complying with a Congress subpoena to review a document somehow authenticates the information? Lol. Two administrations passed on the information, with Bill Barr himself stating any information obtained by Giuliani lacked credibility.
Printable View
Remember this part?
This is what you get for believing anything that comes out of the mouth of Jamie Raskin.Quote:
The FBI and Justice Department under then-Attorney General William P. Barr reviewed allegations from a confidential informant about Joe Biden and his family, and they determined there were no grounds for further investigative steps, according to Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) and other people familiar with the investigation.
Point to me the special counsel appointment or indictment for these alleged criminal actions which occured 6-7 years ago, there are none. There weren't any in 2020, there aren't any now because there were no criminal actions. The vaunted 'October Surprise' was a fabrication. The FBI document as described for Faux Nudes, states a Buriska executive, allegedly told another source they would pay $5 million each to the Bidens. No evidence of that occurring has been presented in 7 years and Rep Gomer is waving his war banner over hearsay statements. Do you think the FBI should have opened an investigation over hearsay? They obviously didn't think so, but share with us your evidence.
https://youtu.be/2npzG0p00JA
https://everytownresearch.org/report/city-data/
Top 16 cities of gun violence: All Democrat run for years. Odd how that works out isn't it?
The US doesn't have a gun violence problem... Democrats have a gun violence problem.
Wait I thought it was a trans with guns problem.
Wait, what about the angry right wingers shooting up churches, grocery stores, and schools?
I think I see something in common in all these scenarios here.
It's the guns. They're a little too easily obtainable. It's unreasonable to allow easy access to a 40 round mag equipped semi-automatic killing machine to everyone as easily as they can buy a knife.