That's not a fair question. It assumes that we should get "fired up" over ever bad news broadcast, every murder, every injustice. You know this though and I know that you're just using this as a chance to take some shots at me. That's ok too.
Printable View
You don't get pissed when someone is murdered and said person was on the government's radar and the government tried to do the right thing and move them away from citizens but another part of the government stepped in and cared more about the murderer's "rights" than the rights of citizens?
Please stop. Just say you don't care because it feeds into Trump's arguments about illegal immigration? Why can't you just be honest?
Did you get pissed when that asshole murdered that woman in Charlottesville? I was pissed, even though the left and the media used that tragedy to paint Trump and all of his supporters as racist KKK murderers.
The government didn't say what you think they said. We sure as fuck didn't say that a murderers rights outweigh the rights of our citizens. That's straight up Fox News editorial b.s. and you know better.
You know better about this whole line of reasoning you're employing.
This is why he wasn't deported. The law was unconstitutional.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...d6b_story.htmlQuote:
In the appeals case, Moldova native Constantine Fedor Golicov was convicted in Utah of failing to stop at a police officer’s command, prompting immigration officials to begin deportation proceedings against him. On appeal, Golicov argued that federal law outlining “classes” of immigrants who could be deported, including those convicted of a “crime of violence,” was unconstitutionally vague and should not be used to justify his removal from the country.
The U.S. Supreme Court took up a similar case this year, striking down part of federal immigration law making it easier to deport immigrants convicted of “a crime of violence.” Justice Neil Gorsuch, nominated by President Donald Trump, joined the court’s four liberal justices in that 5-4 decision.