Things that made you laugh today (Political Version)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

Thousands of instances of gun violence per year support my argument. How many times in the last decade has there been a mass casualty event from a vehicle used a deliberate weapon? 15-20? The problem with your spin is it's predicated on hyperbole.

---

I like how you compare just general "gun violence" to "mass casualty event from a vehicle" and think anyone is going to take your retarded arguments seriously.

You suck at everything. It's time for you to acknowledge and accept it.

https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chor...ost-game.0.gif

We know now the woman had purchased seven guns, all purchased legally. Some of those guns were used to slaughter innocents. Between this woman, Uvalde, and the Crumbley's facilitating the Michigan shooting, when are Republicans going to do something about gun violence?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

We know now the woman had purchased seven guns, all purchased legally. Some of those guns were used to slaughter innocents. Between this woman, Uvalde, and the Crumbley's facilitating the Michigan shooting, when are Republicans going to do something about gun violence?

---

As soon as Democrats do something about murdering human beings in the womb.

So, never.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

Thousands of instances of gun violence per year support my argument. How many times in the last decade has there been a mass casualty event from a vehicle used a deliberate weapon? 15-20? The problem with your spin is it's predicated on hyperbole.

---

We’ll just end up going in circles because you are incapable of logic, and you go on these kinds of rants repeating the narrative every time there is a mass shooting. So to you I simply say no. I will not support support any infringements on constitutional rights. I will not trade freedom in response to a crisis for a false sense of public safety. Lets find a way to prevent these kind of tragedies without circumventing the constitution & individual liberties.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

We know now the woman had purchased seven guns, all purchased legally. Some of those guns were used to slaughter innocents. Between this woman, Uvalde, and the Crumbley's facilitating the Michigan shooting, when are Republicans going to do something about gun violence?

---

Well, people like you continue to object to common sense measures like metal detectors in schools, armed officers in every school, firearm safety classes and so on for schools. And then when people get arrested and convicted, you and other dumbasses argue for no cash bail, early release and parole. Simple fact, around 50% of all violent crimes are committed by those that released, parole or escapes. If you deal with gang and drug violence in the 10 most violent cities, where it is notable, the vast majority of which have the most restrictive gun laws in the US, you remove 80+% of the gun violence in the US. But you and other Leftists won't acknowledge it cause that undermines your attempts at control of the masses.

1

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

We know now the woman had purchased seven guns, all purchased legally. Some of those guns were used to slaughter innocents. Between this woman, Uvalde, and the Crumbley's facilitating the Michigan shooting, when are Republicans going to do something about gun violence?

---

So what gun laws would have prevented this perfectly legal citizen from buying a gun? What gun laws would have prevented this until now, law abiding citizen from killing children?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

Thousands of instances of gun violence per year support my argument. How many times in the last decade has there been a mass casualty event from a vehicle used a deliberate weapon? 15-20? The problem with your spin is it's predicated on hyperbole.

---

Guns have been around for hundreds of years. Why is it only relatively recently that this has become a problem?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

We know now the woman had purchased seven guns, all purchased legally. Some of those guns were used to slaughter innocents. Between this woman, Uvalde, and the Crumbley's facilitating the Michigan shooting, when are Republicans going to do something about gun violence?

---

What new gun laws in your head would have prevented this and the other 2 shootings?

Be specific.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Tie ownership to people who would be eligible for service. No criminals, mental health clearance(no mentally ill can own), basic citizenship/loyalty test (no radicalists), no drug use.

People who already own can be grandfathered in (no feasible way to just "seize" firearms ex post facto)

Harsher penalties for use in commission of crime and unlawful possession.

Red flag laws but with right to counsel, high burden of proof, short turn around times to ensure due process

SRO/community policing funding

Have to start conversation somewhere and come off hard positions and negotiate a solution my gemstone friends

Probably nothing will happen bc default position of ban assault rifles/infringing my rights will dominate media and talking heads

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LOL BRIELUS

Red flag laws but with right to counsel, high burden of proof, short turn around times to ensure due process

---

Yes, I'm sure there will totally be "short turn around times" for red flag laws.