Printable View
How fucking dare you!? You put Donald in the Liberal category or else!Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
And his last name is Trump! You will show him respect, believe me. He's made fantastic and yuge companies and hired thousands and thousands of people. You probably haven't hired any!
I work with a guy whose last name is Rumpf, and I'm sure he'll be quite offended to hear this.Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
REPORTED ENJOY YOUR BAN NUB
He is the most conservative conservative to ever conserve!Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
LOL! Yay for John Oliver! #MakeDonaldDrumpfAgainQuote:
Originally Posted by drauz
"If we don't have a nominee who can win on the first ballot, I'm for none of the above. They all had a chance to win. None of them won. So I'm for none of the above. I'm for Paul Ryan to be our nominee." -John Boehner
Political commentator Bill O’Reilly on Tuesday defended the working conditions for the slaves who built the White House, attempting to fact-check Michelle Obama’s speech from the night before.
"Slaves that worked there were well fed and had decent lodgings provided by the government, which stopped hiring slave labor in 1802," said the host of Fox’s “The Factor."
What did he say that was factually inaccurate.. or are you just saying he said something stupid because he corrected The First Lady?Quote:
Originally Posted by Fallen
He said nothing factually inaccurate. Saying the slaves were well fed and had decent lodgings in response to someone pointing out that the White House was built by slaves seems like a dumb thing to say to me. Your results may vary.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Saying that the slaves "were well-fed and had decent lodging" reads to a lot of people as slavery apologism.
It is far more accurate than saying the White House was built by slaves... given they were a minority of the workforce and they got paid.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fallen
Unless you don't know what slavery means?