Michigan DA politicizing school shooting tragedy by charging parents

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gelston

I didn't say it did, I said that is the usual motivation. Premeditation isn't terrorism, it is why we have 1st degree murder charges. So again, what ideal was he trying to coerce people onto accept by using violence? Stop bring opposite just to be opposite.

---

And "usual motivation" is irrelevant to the State of Michigan. Really awesome you came to Methais rescue after their patent fail on convincing anyone but themself. Not gonna waste my time trying to imply motive beyond what the prosecutor has already shown to get the charges approved. It's irrelevant.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage

I really enjoy how some folks have become experts in state and local laws and that they communicate that expertise so eloquently through this forum.

I had no idea the constitutional scholars and law experts we had here!

---

Here's another time waster. Are you one of those elitists that presume no one but an expert in a very specific area are allowed to point out consistency with written law? Because these jackholes are trying to rewrite Michigan's quoted statute to push a false narrative.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

And "usual motivation" is irrelevant to the State of Michigan. Really awesome you came to Methais rescue after their patent fail on convincing anyone but themself. Not gonna waste my time trying to imply motive beyond what the prosecutor has already shown to get the charges approved. It's irrelevant.

---

Hey idiot, I didn't say that it was required or in any state of law. I said the USUAL motivation of people committing terrorism is Political or Religious, as in MOST acts of terrorism are conducted by people trying to push a specific religious or political point of view.. You 100% fail at reading comprehension.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage

I really enjoy how some folks have become experts in state and local laws and that they communicate that expertise so eloquently through this forum.

I had no idea the constitutional scholars and law experts we had here!

---

I've taken a few college courses on terrorism and several courses while I was in the military. Just about every Criminal Justice course I've taken involves a chapter on it too. I'm not an expert, but I guarantee I know more about it than Seran.

It really is amusing how hard Seran is defending this bogus terrorism charge without explaining why it makes sense while simultaneously saying a similar charge for the Texas shooter doesn’t make sense. His entire argument seems to hinge on the fact that the Texas shooter didn’t kill anyone, as if the Texas shooter was only trying to wound people.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gelston

Hey idiot, I didn't say that it was required or in any state of law. I said the USUAL motivation of people committing terrorism is Political or Religious, as in MOST acts of terrorism are conducted by people trying to push a specific religious or political point of view.. You 100% fail at reading comprehension.

---

Here's the FBI's definition of terrorism, which is about actual terrorism:

https://i.imgur.com/J9Lr1U8.png



And here's Michigan's soy definition, which is any situation where someone gets scared:

https://i.imgur.com/um0jM3J.png
https://i.imgur.com/ZlB6DdM.png


I wonder if Michigan considers people with PTSD, regardless of how they got it, as terrorism survivors.

Either way, using Michigan's logic, if I walked into a room and Seran's mom was there naked, that would be considered terrorism due to the lifelong emotional scarring and nightmares I would suffer.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Methais

Here's the FBI's definition of terrorism, which is about actual terrorism:

https://i.imgur.com/J9Lr1U8.png



And here's Michigan's soy definition, which is any situation where someone gets scared:

https://i.imgur.com/um0jM3J.png
https://i.imgur.com/ZlB6DdM.png


I wonder if Michigan considers people with PTSD, regardless of how they got it, as terrorism survivors.

Either way, using Michigan's logic, if I walked into a room and Seran's mom was there naked, that would be considered terrorism due to the lifelong emotional scarring and nightmares I would suffer.

---

This bullshit charge pushed by the Democrat DA and Democrat Sheriff opens the door for just about anyone to be charged with terrorism.

Someone robbed a liquor store and people were terrorized by the event? The robber gets to spend the rest of his life in prison on terrorism charges!

A bar fight broke out which resulted in several people getting PTSD? Terrorism! Life in prison for everyone involved!

This coming from the same political party who thinks there are too many people in jail.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gelston

I'm not an expert, but I guarantee I know more about it than Seran.

---

https://i.gifer.com/J4Mg.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

To note, if his statement about shooting in the school was known to the school before the shooting, then contributory negligence may be in order. Civil lawsuits would also be a slam dunk if true.

---

Wait wait. So the parents get charged with manslaughter even though they were nowhere near the school when the shooting happened, but the school officials who failed to properly protect students get off and the school just faces a civil lawsuit?

You are perhaps the most useless human being that has ever existed.

So man mental gymnastics on the Right, trying to politicize everything, drawing comparisons to completely unrelated events with no valid reference. Going full on retard mode to blame the school for student deaths. All of this to distract from the fact that no one would have died that day if the kid didn't have a firearm.