Pelosi officially announces impeachment inquiry

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

Okay, I'll grant your premise for the sake of your hypothetical, but with a distinction. If and only if Hunter Biden were currently on the board of Burisma and the aid being paid to Ukraine were for energy infrastructure or purchases, then yes it would be fair for Ukraine to investigate.

However this is not the case. Not only is he no longer with Burisma, but the military aid package is actually a Government to Government purchase of military equipment and defensive weapons. Burisma is a privately held company who is in no way associated with military purchase or deployment. This is why a current investigation is not only irrelevant, but a silly distraction engineered by the RNC.

---

50K a month to someone with literally zero experience with the industry... and when the investigation started... the then Vice President stopped the investigation and got the head of the investigation fired.. then bragged about it...

Yea... nothing to see here at all..................

https://media0.giphy.com/media/ZiDnfvNB4PjVu/giphy.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tgo01

It has everything to do with the topic and I think you finally figured it out which is why you're doing what you do best: deflect and spin like there is no tomorrow.

I'll ask again just to see if you're actually interested in conversation like you claimed a couple of days ago.

If Trump had good reason to believe corruption occurred surrounding the Burisma/Hunter Biden/Joe Biden mess and HAVING NOTHING TO DO WITH AID, do you think it would be wrong of Trump to ask Ukraine to look into it? Or would you consider this "digging up dirt" on a political opponent, even if Trump had actual good reason to believe corruption happened?

---

Just because you're rehashing the same question doesn't change my answer. If you want to pick it apart and discuss the points, feel free, but I'm not as talented a copy and paste mechanic as you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage

As I've stated before, all you have to do is recognize that QPQ is literally how we deal with everyone in the world.

---

I don't grant your premise. Diplomacy on behalf of the United States is one thing. Pushing your unsubstantiated conspiracies for personal political gain is aj abuse of power.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

I don't grant your premise. Diplomacy on behalf of the United States is one thing. Pushing your unsubstantiated conspiracies for personal political gain is aj abuse of power.

---

Substantiate your third sentence only using the transcript or 1st person testimony to hearing the call.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

No. This whole thing is about the President holding up military assistance to the Ukraine in exchange for announcing they're investigating Hunter Biden and Russian involvement in 2016 election interference. If you're implying Hunter's testimony is required to validate the President's request, I'll point out that the President, nor anyone on the RNC has publically defined relevance. Further, Hunter Biden is not being investigated for impeachment, though it's obvious you and the RNC would like to pretend it is. For that reason, I doubt Mr Archer will be called as their is no relevance.

Nellie Ohr and Alexandra Chalupa also have no relevance, beyond the RNC wishing to make this about anyone but Trump and his alleged misdeeds.

---

You're a giant tard.

And you think Trump's going to be removed from office :lol: :lol: :lol:





















































































































:lol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage

Substantiate your third sentence only using the transcript or 1st person testimony to hearing the call.

---

Democrats have first person accounting of the call, as well as the call summary document furnished by the White House. If you've read the bipartisan depositions conducted by the House, it's looking pretty grim.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

Democrats have first person accounting of the call, as well as the call summary document furnished by the White House. If you've read the bipartisan depositions conducted by the House, it's looking pretty grim.

---

If you've read them, you'd note that everything leads back to a single person who THINKS the president may have done something wrong, but has literally said he did not hear QPQ.

https://politics.theonion.com/tips-f...ess-1839724614

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Archigeek

https://politics.theonion.com/tips-f...ess-1839724614

---

That was funny stuff, thanks for sharing!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

Just because you're rehashing the same question doesn't change my answer. If you want to pick it apart and discuss the points, feel free, but I'm not as talented a copy and paste mechanic as you.

---

Because you didn’t answer my question, you deflected and distracted like the pro you are.