The Third Industrial Revolution Will Be Bigger Than the First Two

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Back

I can't find any links about Grok calling itself CyberStalin. Link?

---

I believe this is where I saw that:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GvXnu2EWwAA2IC1.jpg

The CyberStalin / MechaHitler phrase isn’t that important. There were many prior complaints that Grok possessed a severe leftwing bias. The xAI team implemented an update over the weekend to help correct that bias. Perhaps said update went a bit too far towards a right bias. Anyways, they’re constantly making tweaks and I’m sure they’ll work it out in time. The goal is for Grok to respond with objective truths free from political bias, but that’s not easy. It takes time, development, and training.

Also in case you think Grok is like RoboCop who has a secret primary directive to serve Musk and his companies:

https://iili.io/FEZDNHb.jpg

https://iili.io/FEt312V.jpg

Most and least AI-proof jobs

Quote:

---

Microsoft released a study assessing jobs' vulnerability to being replaced by AI based on whether AI is currently being used for that work, how successfully it does so and how much of that occupation's work is accounted for by AI.


Most vulnerable:

1. Interpreters and translators (Score: 0.49, Number employed: 51,560)
2. Historians (0.48, 3,040)
3. Passenger attendants (0.46, 20,190)
4. Sales representatives of services (0.46, 1,142,020)
5. Writers and authors (0.45, 49,450)
6. Customer service representatives (0.44, 2,858,710)
7. CNC (computer numerical control) tool programmers: (0.44, 28,030)
8. Telephone operators (0.42, 4,600)
9. Ticket agents and travel clerks (0.41, 119,270)
10. Broadcast announcers and radio DJs (0.41, 25,070)

Least vulnerable:

1. Dredge operators (0.00, 940)
2. Bridge and lock tenders (0.00, 3,460)
3. Water treatment plant and system operators (0.00, 120,710)
4. Foundry mold and coremakers (0.00, 11,780)
5. Rail-track laying and maintenance equipment operators (0.00, 18,770)
6. Pile driver operators (0.00, 3,010)
7. Floor sanders and finishers (0.00, 5,070)
8. Orderlies (0.00, 48,710)
9. Motorboat operators (0.00, 2,710)
10. Logging equipment operators (0.01, 23,720)

See the full list.

---

https://www.axios.com/newsletters/ax...emshare#story4

If I had to choose one of the least vulnerable it would have to be motorboat operator. One of my first and favorite jobs was delivery. Got paid to travel plus I like driving.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Back

Most and least AI-proof jobs



https://www.axios.com/newsletters/ax...emshare#story4

If I had to choose one of the least vulnerable it would have to be motorboat operator. One of my first and favorite jobs was delivery. Got paid to travel plus I like driving.

---

Delivery jobs are already starting to be automated.

Quote:

---

The latest uproar came after Vogue’s July print edition featured a Guess ad with a typical model for the brand: thin yet voluptuous, glossy blond tresses, pouty rose lips. She exemplified North American beauty standards, but there was one problem — she was AI generated.

The internet buzzed for days, in large part because the AI-generated beauty showed up in Vogue, the fashion bible that dictates what is and is not acceptable in the industry. The AI-generated model was featured in an advertisement, not a Vogue editorial spread. And Vogue told TechCrunch the ad met its advertising standards.

To many, an ad versus an editorial is a distinction without a difference.

More...

---

I've decided not to become a movie star. It's not a safe long-term job. The current generation of big movies stars -- Leonardo, Tom, Brad -- may be the last, soon to be replaced by cheaper and more reliable machine-generated virtual actors.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkIkeIYhXZU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkIkeIYhXZU

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ClydeR

I've decided not to become a movie star. It's not a safe long-term job. The current generation of big movies stars -- Leonardo, Tom, Brad -- may be the last, soon to be replaced by cheaper and more reliable machine-generated virtual actors.

---

Yea, that's why... it has nothing to do with your ugly face, inability to speak publically.. or your stifling social disorders...

No, you choose not to be a success because you don't want to eventually be replaced by AI.

No AI will ever want or need to replace an unemployed manchild.

You will never, ever be replaced... to the dismay of your mother.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ClydeR

I've decided not to become a movie star. It's not a safe long-term job. The current generation of big movies stars -- Leonardo, Tom, Brad -- may be the last, soon to be replaced by cheaper and more reliable machine-generated virtual actors.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkIkeIYhXZU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkIkeIYhXZU

---

Don’t worry. You can continue to be a leftist loser that lives in your mom’s basement. AI won’t be replacing your career choice of being a bum anytime soon.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ClydeR

I've decided not to become a movie star. It's not a safe long-term job. The current generation of big movies stars -- Leonardo, Tom, Brad -- may be the last, soon to be replaced by cheaper and more reliable machine-generated virtual actors.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkIkeIYhXZU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkIkeIYhXZU

---

Summer job as a fluffer didn't go as planned huh?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ClydeR

I've decided not to become a movie star. It's not a safe long-term job. The current generation of big movies stars -- Leonardo, Tom, Brad -- may be the last, soon to be replaced by cheaper and more reliable machine-generated virtual actors.

---

Maybe, though more likely from Bollywood. I wish more of the Bollywood movies came with available English. Some of them are really good and their action movies are like the old Saturday afternoon B movies but with a real budget and special effects. They look like a lot of fun and seriously, many of the women are smoking hot without all the plastic.