Yeah...I'll go do that while you read Exodus 21:22 and tell me with a straight face that God thinks a fetus is the same thing as a person.
Printable View
I see you still don't have that scientific evidence to support your argument. So it's not science that's saying that a fetus is the same thing as a person.
You're just making things up and don't realize it anymore.
So what's your actual argument against abortion again? What's your evidence that a fetus is functionally a child at conception, and that its existence is more important than the woman carrying it, who is indisputably a person?
Uhm...so there are like a gajillion translations of this but here are a few I found:
Quote:
If people are fighting and hit a pregnant woman and she gives birth prematurely but there is no serious injury, the offender must be fined whatever the woman’s husband demands and the court allows.
Quote:
Now suppose two men are fighting, and in the process they accidentally strike a pregnant woman so she gives birth prematurely. If no further injury results, the man who struck the woman must pay the amount of compensation the woman’s husband demands and the judges approve.
Quote:
If men who are fighting strike a pregnant woman and her child is born prematurely, but there is no further injury, he shall surely be fined as the woman’s husband demands and as the court allows.
Quote:
If men fight, and hurt a woman with child, so that she gives birth prematurely, yet no harm follows, he shall surely be punished accordingly as the woman’s husband imposes on him; and he shall pay as the judges determine.
Quote:
When men get in a fight and hit a pregnant woman so that her children are born prematurely but there is no injury, the one who hit her must be fined as the woman’s husband demands from him, and he must pay according to judicial assessment.
So uh...where in there do you get the idea that God doesn't think a fetus is a person?Quote:
If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman's husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine.
Both.
https://www.gannett-cdn.com/presto/2...pjpg&auto=webp
https://media.istockphoto.com/photos...p21dq8V55YT6A=
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Sc-rYnE6CGU/mqdefault.jpg
Which one is indisputably a person?
Person: "a human being regarded as an individual."
Individual: "a single human being as distinct from a group, class, or family."
Distinct: "recognizably different in nature from something else of a similar type." (as in "a distinct set of DNA")
What's like knowing your supposed college degrees are worth less than my 7th grade biology class?
Oh I forgot about your religious supremacy... So you must be one of those types that take short verses from the Old Testament completely out of context in the most narrow minded literal interpretation to use as supporting evidence of whatever twisted agenda you desire, huh?
I’ll play your fun little game. Deuteronomy 22:23-24
23 If a man happens to meet in a town a virgin pledged to be married and he sleeps with her,
24 you shall take both of them to the gate of that town and stone them to death—the young woman because she was in a town and did not scream for help, and the man because he violated another man’s wife. You must purge the evil from among you.
Yeah we should totally make a law for that exactly as it’s described. Right?
Da Baby gets to live because (insert preferred pronoun definitely not based upon having a penis or vagina) is already doing (pronoun’s) part keeping us all safe by wearing a mask.
Ole boomer-faced gets to live because A) She is brown and indigenous AND B) is needed for a bikini photo to go on the cover of next month’s Vogue series “The modern sexy”.
40 year old white supremacist Karen doesn’t look nearly woke enough. She probably wears a MAGA hat. Definitely sub-human and needs to be purged.
What do I win???