No. They're not. And even if they were, I have bad news for you. There's a lot of French shit in England, English, and the United States too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
Printable View
No. They're not. And even if they were, I have bad news for you. There's a lot of French shit in England, English, and the United States too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
https://www.exchangerates.org.uk/ima...n-dollar-2.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Stumplicker
That's not Napoleon on the Canadian monopoly money.
https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/00...g?v=1542752449
And they didn't concoct this delicious beverage for Inspector Clouseau.
They are a member of the Commonwealth of Nations, aka British Commonwealth. But okay.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stumplicker
Canada has been independent from Britain since the 1860s. You might recognize that as just a little bit after the US became independent from Britain, and also it was 160 years ago.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
So are Australia, India and South Africa. Are those also England?Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
No one is saying they are England. England is England. They are also under the British Commonwealth.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stumplicker
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
They are not subjects to anyone. They are an independent country, and have been for 160 years. Like all the other 53 independent countries that are part of the Commonwealth of Nations, which is what it has been called for the last 80 years or so.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
You seem a bit upset that French Canadians are faux French, it's all an act.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stumplicker
Yes, I'm sure that's it. I'm not just calling your statement wrong. I'm also soooo angry about it all grrrrrrr. And now that you've said I'm upset I'm even sooo much more angry exclamation points.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
They aren't French. They are Canadians.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stumplicker