Things that made you frown today (Political Version)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cwolff

You are assuming too much. I do not think they are widespread and I do not think they are silent like in the movies. I've never said they were. It's on you for making these assumptions.

I pointed to Christoper Dorner as an example of the effectiveness of the silencer in the commission of crimes. Make them ubiquitious and this will happen more.



I made it from the beginning you steaming asshole and I've pasted it again. Go back and read you slimy little fucking worm. God Damn Gelston. You're really a piece of shit sometimes.

---

You haven't addressed

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cwolff

Once suppressors are out there in large numbers they'll be used to assassinate cops, shoot up people in mass killings and generally be used to advantage anyway that a firearm is used today; even in crime..

---

that anywhere. Even when I point out the BATFE ITSELF wants them deregulated because they are barely even used in any crimes. 44 crimes total in the past decade, out of 1.3 million registered and untold unregistered.

Quote:

---

The FBI estimates that 1% or fewer of crimes that involve gunfire are committed with silenced guns.

---

Here's a link to gunfire locator technology.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gunfire_locator

Why should anyone go back and read your posts. You don't read ours, you don't go back and look at ours and you usually don't read sources we post. You demand actions you are unwilling to take. You call be delusional yet you believe in Socialism and tacts and policies that have always ended in tyranny and oppression and still you complain that we won't bow to your wishes. Here is a simple fact, you are barking up the wrong tree, your sudden concern for police is highly suspect and your position is simply bad.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cwolff

You are assuming too much. I do not think they are widespread and I do not think they are silent like in the movies. I've never said they were. It's on you for making these assumptions.

I pointed to Christoper Dorner as an example of the effectiveness of the silencer in the commission of crimes. Make them ubiquitious and this will happen more.

---

You're simultaneously arguing that suppressors are ineffective and supereffective. Either suppressors are able to let you stealthily kill people and are about to come into widespread use in crime, or they are nowhere near as effective or in widespread usage as media portrays them. Sort your shit out dude.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~

Why should anyone go back and read your posts. You don't read ours, you don't go back and look at ours and you usually don't read sources we post. You demand actions you are unwilling to take. You call be delusional yet you believe in Socialism and tacts and policies that have always ended in tyranny and oppression and still you complain that we won't bow to your wishes. Here is a simple fact, you are barking up the wrong tree, your sudden concern for police is highly suspect and your position is simply bad.

---

You sound like a child. "Mommy, why should I share my toys, kevin doesn't"

You also assume too much. You've called me a communist and a socialist and a fascist and keep spouting this theory that socialism is a 1 way street to the gulag. WTF dude. Get a grip. What's this sudden concern bullshit also? I've let that go, but you need to address this. Am I anti-cop? Am I out here pasting "fuck the police" or something? Here's a hint. I'm not. Not anti-police, not anti-government. I'm glad to pay my taxes and glad that those taxes go to provide a safe community for me and my family thanks to the police.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Taernath

You're simultaneously arguing that suppressors are ineffective and supereffective. Either suppressors are able to let you stealthily kill people and are about to come into widespread use in crime, or they are nowhere near as effective or in widespread usage as media portrays them. Sort your shit out dude.

---

You can always say you're right if you say everything.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Taernath

You're simultaneously arguing that suppressors are ineffective and supereffective. Either suppressors are able to let you stealthily kill people and are about to come into widespread use in crime, or they are nowhere near as effective or in widespread usage as media portrays them. Sort your shit out dude.

---

Bullshit Taernath. I'm saying nothing of the kind. 1) Suppressors are effective. 2) Put a shit ton of them into circulation and they'll get used in crimes to good effect. It ain't no riddle.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cwolff

Bullshit Taernath. I'm saying nothing of the kind. 1) Suppressors are effective. 2) Put a shit ton of them into circulation and they'll get used in crimes to good effect. It ain't no riddle.

---

The BATFE disagrees with you. and yes, they are very effective for not fucking up the shooters hearing. You still need to wear hearing pro with them though.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gelston

The BATFE disagrees with you. and yes, they are very effective for not fucking up the shooters hearing. You still need to wear hearing pro with them though.

---

Give it a few years, let them get out there en masse and we'll see what happens.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cwolff

1) Suppressors are effective.

---

If you know what they actually do, you wouldn't be saying that. A handful of decibel reduction isn't effective.

Quote:

---

2) Put a shit ton of them into circulation and they'll get used in crimes to good effect. It ain't no riddle.

---

You got that from one data point?