Things that made you frown today (Political Version)

Printable View

Show 200 post(s) from this thread on one page

06-10-2018, 02:49 PM
Gelston

Quote:

Originally Posted by cwolff

The bottom line is this: Use either word. Don't be so sanctimonious about it and good luck looking for the ATF Suppressor Application.

You'd be retarded if you did, because there isn't a specific application for them. You do a standard ATF Form-4.
06-10-2018, 02:51 PM
Gelston

A .22LR with a suppressor is still 112 decibels. According to Purdue, it compares to... Steel mill, auto horn at 1 meter. Turbo-fan aircraft at takeoff power at 200 ft (118 dB). Riveting machine (110 dB); live rock music (108 - 114 dB).

A suppressed M1911, .45 is 130 decibels, which according to Purdue is the same as Military jet aircraft take-off from aircraft carrier with afterburner at 50 ft (130 dB).
06-10-2018, 02:58 PM
cwolff

Quote:

Originally Posted by cwolff

Once suppressors are out there in large numbers they'll be used to assassinate cops, shoot up people in mass killings and generally be used to advantage anyway that a firearm is used today; even in crime. What will the NRA position be then? To sell some sort of anti suppressor handheld flash detector? They certainly won't retract their love of supporessors so my guess is there will be an add on sale type of product to defend against these two BFF's.

In response to Gelston's comments that it will be ovious a firearm discharged even with a suppressor:

Quote:

Originally Posted by cwolff

Actually it won't be very obvious. Dorner proved that in 2013. They will also have a negative effect on gunshot detection systems some cities use to alert police to the discharge of firearms. Go ahead and make them easier to get. We'll see the used more commonly in crime. It'll be good business for the gun industry. Not only will they sell more silencers but they will also be able to work on upgrading and selling better detection systems. It's a win win for the NRA and the manufacturers for whom they lobby.

FYI: a silencer is a suppressor. Maybe more accurate to say that all suppressors are in fact silencers.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taernath

BUT WHY WOULD THEY BE CALLED SILENCERS IF THEY DON'T MAKE GUNSHOTS SILENT? - cwolff, probably

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taernath

Aren't you a veteran? How do you not know that suppressors don't work like movie silencers?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gelston

Fine, they are also called silencers. Do you have any other point other than their name? Are you scared of the name? Do you still think they actually make weapons silent? What about all these cops that are getting assassinated by suppressed weapons?

Quite fankly you fucks owe me an apology. First of all I addressed concerns around the use of silencers early in this discussion, I know what a silencer is, I'm not scared of the name (FFS I was an 0311) and you're all butthurt because I taught you something you didn't know.
06-10-2018, 03:01 PM
Gelston

Quote:

Originally Posted by cwolff

In response to Gelston's comments that it will be ovious a firearm discharged even with a suppressor:

Quite fankly you fucks owe me an apology. First of all I addressed concerns around the use of silencers early in this discussion, I know what a silencer is, I'm not scared of the name (FFS I was an 0311) and you're all butthurt because I taught you something you didn't know.

Quite fankly, you didn't address anything. Again, where are all the people assassinating police officers?
06-10-2018, 03:01 PM
Wrathbringer

Quote:

Originally Posted by cwolff

In response to Gelston's comments that it will be ovious a firearm discharged even with a suppressor:

Quite fankly you fucks owe me an apology. First of all I addressed concerns around the use of silencers early in this discussion, I know what a silencer is, I'm not scared of the name (FFS I was an 0311) and you're all butthurt because I taught you something you didn't know.

lol soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo retarded.
06-10-2018, 03:02 PM
RichardCranium

Quote:

Originally Posted by cwolff

In response to Gelston's comments that it will be ovious a firearm discharged even with a suppressor:

Quite fankly you fucks owe me an apology. First of all I addressed concerns around the use of silencers early in this discussion, I know what a silencer is, I'm not scared of the name (FFS I was an 0311) and you're all butthurt because I taught you something you didn't know.

Actually you're just spouting more motherjones bullshit and claiming it as fact, but that's not really surprising.
06-10-2018, 03:03 PM
Gelston

Quote:

Originally Posted by cwolff

Once suppressors are out there in large numbers they'll be used to assassinate cops, shoot up people in mass killings and generally be used to advantage anyway that a firearm is used today; even in crime. What will the NRA position be then? To sell some sort of anti suppressor handheld flash detector? They certainly won't retract their love of supporessors so my guess is there will be an add on sale type of product to defend against these two BFF's.

Quote:

Originally Posted by cwolff

Once suppressors are out there in large numbers they'll be used to assassinate cops, shoot up people in mass killings and generally be used to advantage anyway that a firearm is used today; even in crime. What will the NRA position be then? To sell some sort of anti suppressor handheld flash detector? They certainly won't retract their love of supporessors so my guess is there will be an add on sale type of product to defend against these two BFF's.

Quote:

Originally Posted by cwolff

Once suppressors are out there in large numbers they'll be used to assassinate cops, shoot up people in mass killings and generally be used to advantage anyway that a firearm is used today; even in crime. What will the NRA position be then? To sell some sort of anti suppressor handheld flash detector? They certainly won't retract their love of supporessors so my guess is there will be an add on sale type of product to defend against these two BFF's.

Quote:

Originally Posted by cwolff

Once suppressors are out there in large numbers they'll be used to assassinate cops, shoot up people in mass killings and generally be used to advantage anyway that a firearm is used today; even in crime. What will the NRA position be then? To sell some sort of anti suppressor handheld flash detector? They certainly won't retract their love of supporessors so my guess is there will be an add on sale type of product to defend against these two BFF's.

Quote:

Originally Posted by cwolff

Once suppressors are out there in large numbers they'll be used to assassinate cops, shoot up people in mass killings and generally be used to advantage anyway that a firearm is used today; even in crime. What will the NRA position be then? To sell some sort of anti suppressor handheld flash detector? They certainly won't retract their love of supporessors so my guess is there will be an add on sale type of product to defend against these two BFF's.

Quote:

Originally Posted by cwolff

Once suppressors are out there in large numbers they'll be used to assassinate cops, shoot up people in mass killings and generally be used to advantage anyway that a firearm is used today; even in crime. What will the NRA position be then? To sell some sort of anti suppressor handheld flash detector? They certainly won't retract their love of supporessors so my guess is there will be an add on sale type of product to defend against these two BFF's.

Well cwolff? They are legal in 43 states? WHERE IS ALL THE SUPPRESSOR CRIME?
06-10-2018, 03:04 PM
Neveragain

Quote:

Originally Posted by cwolff

Quite fankly you fucks owe me an apology.

https://i.imgur.com/eYlA3xx.gif
06-10-2018, 03:07 PM
cwolff

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gelston

Quite fankly, you didn't address anything. Again, where are all the people assassinating police officers?

Where did I say that all these people are assassinating police officers? I'll help you out. I never did. We do have Dorner's example. When he shot those cops they were baffled why neighbors never reported gunshots. The reason they didn't? Take a guess...Silencers.

Make these things ubiquitous will mean they'll be used more and more often in crime. Does anyone not agree with that? If so, please explain.
06-10-2018, 03:08 PM
Gelston

Quote:

Originally Posted by cwolff

Where did I say that all these people are assassinating police officers? I'll help you out. I never did. We do have Dorner's example. When he shot those cops they were baffled why neighbors never reported gunshots. The reason they didn't? Take a guess...Silencers.

Make these things ubiquitous will mean they'll be used more and more often in crime. Does anyone not agree with that? If so, please explain.

Quote:

Originally Posted by cwolff

Once suppressors are out there in large numbers they'll be used to assassinate cops, shoot up people in mass killings and generally be used to advantage anyway that a firearm is used today; even in crime. What will the NRA position be then? To sell some sort of anti suppressor handheld flash detector? They certainly won't retract their love of supporessors so my guess is there will be an add on sale type of product to defend against these two BFF's.

They are out there in large numbers. Where are they assassinating cops at?

Show 200 post(s) from this thread on one page