Printable View
Good.Quote:
Originally Posted by cwolff
We need to investigate how a sitting President was able to eavesdrop on a candidate in the other Party during the election, using very questionable "evidence" that was bought and paid for by the Democrat Party.
Ron Paul was leading the Republican polls going into the Iowa caucuses, the shit that took place around the state that night during and after the polling was extreme. The precinct I represented, he won by nearly 40% over any of the other candidates. It was so fucking bad that Gov. Terry Branstad (R) (Now US Ambassador to China) was asked on FOX what the rest of the nation should take from the state of Iowa if Ron Paul won and he answered "The rest of the country should ignore the caucus outcome."Quote:
Originally Posted by Taernath
Some precincts didn't turn the ballots in, all the ballots from one of the stronger RP counties were being driven around out in the middle of the country on gravel roads and didn't get turned in until like 2 or 3 am. Another precinct they shut the lights off after collecting all the ballots. It was a sham.
Listen to this shit dude.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sD09uVFQs9M
Karl Rove is so full of shit. 1st in the nation state and they are "all polite about politics."
Urrgh, yea I'm bitter about it.
I've been hearing this since Hillary came up with the "BUT RUSSIA" excuse and her faithful followers gobbled it up.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrathbringer
Officials in at least four countries have privately discussed ways they can manipulate Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law and senior adviser, by taking advantage of his complex business arrangements, financial difficulties and lack of foreign policy experience, according to current and former U.S. officials familiar with intelligence reports on the matter.
Among those nations discussing ways to influence Kushner to their advantage were the United Arab Emirates, China, Israel and Mexico, the current and former officials said.
Officials in the White House were concerned that Kushner was “naive and being tricked” in conversations with foreign officials, some of whom said they wanted to deal only with Kushner directly and not more experienced personnel, said one former White House official.
I think you forgot which account you had logged in
https://blog.kareldonk.com/wp-conten...r-shoulder.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
There are some interesting takeaways from the Iowa caucus, namely that the guys who won the popular vote still lost the state. Republicans have since closed that loophole. :thinking:Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
But in the end it didn't matter because Paul still lost the popular vote AND delegate count by a huge margin. There was no massive nation-wide anti Paul election fraud, just like there were no stealth delegates and no stirring speech that rallied everyone to his cause.
I'm not suggesting there was a nation wide anti-paul election fraud. Winning one of the first few states means big donor money, it changes everything about a campaign. Obama is proof of that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Taernath
Winning Iowa helps, but they only get the general election correct about 50% of the time, which... isn't particularly great. It's probably the same for the other states. Paul had nowhere near enough momentum even with a win.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain