Twittergate information dump

The only reason for a legal argument is because a law exists.

Imagine being told that a hacker could freely use your social security number and driver's license because they broke into a third party advertiser and stole a hard drive. So you legitimately think mere possession of stolen information makes it legal to use said information?

Hunter Biden will be prosecuted if an indictment is warranted. Likewise Twitter and the new Joe the Plumber for computing, Clarence the Hacker will probably, will probably be sued.

Also calling anything a 'gate' is so outdated. The GOP needs to find a catchier way to title their partisan attacks.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

Also calling anything a 'gate' is so outdated. The GOP needs to find a catchier way to title their partisan attacks.

---

Yet here you are 112 replies later. Thanks for the daily bumps.

If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

Got that Trump quote yet?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joeyb

lol maybe MSNBC is maybe 'left leaning' but all the other stuff you said is in the center.

---

What? You would have to be one of the biggest retards on here to honestly believe that.

Oh wait.. hey MacGuyver.

Nevermind...

LOL at joeybdipshit comparing a company deciding THEY don't want to run a particular story, to a company deciding they don't want to allow OTHERS to report on/even talk about a particular story.

You are so fucking stupid I'm beginning to think you need someone to remind you to eat every day.

This is all of course even ignoring the very real fact that Twitter suppressed the story on their platform at the behest of the Biden campaign and the DNC, and probably even the FBI. Again, HUGE difference between this and Fox deciding all on their own they don't want to publish a particular story, assuming what you're saying is even true.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tgo01

LOL at joeybdipshit comparing a company deciding THEY don't want to run a particular story, to a company deciding they don't want to allow OTHERS to report on/even talk about a particular story.

You are so fucking stupid I'm beginning to think you need someone to remind you to eat every day.

This is all of course even ignoring the very real fact that Twitter suppressed the story on their platform at the behest of the Biden campaign and the DNC, and probably even the FBI. Again, HUGE difference between this and Fox deciding all on their own they don't want to publish a particular story, assuming what you're saying is even true.

---

Fox published the Stormy Daniels story though.. they just didn't mention it every 5 minutes like CNN did.. so MacGuyver thinks they suppressed it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

Fox published the Stormy Daniels story though.. they just didn't mention it every 5 minutes like CNN did.. so MacGuyver thinks they suppressed it.

---

joeybdipshit was wrong about something? I'm shocked! Shocked I say!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tgo01

LOL at joeybdipshit comparing a company deciding THEY don't want to run a particular story, to a company deciding they don't want to allow OTHERS to report on/even talk about a particular story.

You are so fucking stupid I'm beginning to think you need someone to remind you to eat every day.

This is all of course even ignoring the very real fact that Twitter suppressed the story on their platform at the behest of the Biden campaign and the DNC, and probably even the FBI. Again, HUGE difference between this and Fox deciding all on their own they don't want to publish a particular story, assuming what you're saying is even true.

---

lol why are you so stupid? it's like every time you post you first get into a car accident and then run directly to your keyboard to show off your new brain damage

this thread is full of you retards shitting yourselves over the fact that the Biden campaign got twitter to remove content it didn't like. i showed how the trump admin did the same exact thing and then was making a point about how all media downplays and suppresses stories that don't fit their bias and agenda.

you are literally the dumbest person on this board

parkbandit would you consider killing a story and not talking about it after initially publishing it a form of suppression

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joeyb

parkbandit would you consider killing a story and not talking about it after initially publishing it a form of suppression

---

Yes.

Unfortunately for you, that didn't happen with Fox and Stormy Daniels.

From the very liberal "Washington Post" article I linked earlier, they claim that Fox News talked about the story on March 6th, March 7th and March 8th. I have no way of knowing if this is true or not.. but if the WP said they talked about it for 3 days straight.. seems like they talked about it at the very least those 3 days when the news first broke.

How long do you believe they should have talked about it.. especially since it was later determined that Daniels was wrong and was forced to pay for Trump's legal bills on the subject?