Pelosi officially announces impeachment inquiry

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tgo01

After Tim Morrison, someone who was actually ON THE CALL when it happened, testified under oath that he wasn't concerned with anything he heard and didn't think anything illegal was said the original "whistleblower" suddenly doesn't want to testify under oath before congress.

---

Two people who were on the call, one says they were concerned about the details discussed and reported it, the other stated they weren't concerned. Neither are attorneys, however the one who was "not concerned that anything illegal was discussed." also corroborated the other's testimony about tying military aid to investigations benefiting the Trump re-elect. Democrats have to prove corruption, quid pro quo and/or campaign finance regulations sufficient enough to garner enough votes in the Senate to remove the President from office and that's the key.

Without a doubt, the House will pass formal articles of impeachment and on the flip-side, the Senate will not vote to ratify the impeachment at the two-thirds majority level.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

Two people who were on the call, one says they were concerned about the details discussed and reported it, the other stated they weren't concerned.

---

The whistleblower was NOT on the call, his information was all third hand.

To my knowledge Tim Morrison is the only person who has testified that was actually on the call. If you’re referring to someone else I would be interested in hearing who.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tgo01

The whistleblower was NOT on the call, his information was all third hand.

To my knowledge Tim Morrison is the only person who has testified that was actually on the call. If you’re referring to someone else I would be interested in hearing who.

---

Lt. Col Alexander Vindman was also a party on the call in question and his testimony is pretty damning. Which is exactly why there's so much conservative spin trying to discredit the gentleman.

Excuse me. I said gentleman, but I meant War Hero.

So clearly Vidman is lying if the whistleblower himself is too afraid to testify now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tgo01

So clearly Vidman is lying if the whistleblower himself is too afraid to testify now.

---

That's a strange inference, but hell everyone's welcome to their opinion. Intelligence officers are guaranteed anonymity because their retaliation claims cannot be heard by a court of law.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

Excuse me. I said gentleman, but I meant War Hero.

---

I bet he'd be very upset at you calling him a war hero.

So would Sean Hannity, or Alex Jones but for entirely reasons. Any soldier who served in combat and returned home is a hero and gets my praise.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

So would Sean Hannity, or Alex Jones but for entirely reasons. Any soldier who served in combat and returned home is a hero and gets my praise.

---

I very much doubt that. More like anyone who served in combat and just so happens to testify against a president you don't like you call a war hero in order to bolster said testimony and use his service as a cudgel against anyone who dared speak badly about his testimony.

Similar to how you probably think no one should disagree with that 16 year old "climate expert" because she's a "child" but you probably had little to no problem with almost every single major news network attacking the Covington kids. I just don't know why people like you can't at least be honest.

Only thing missing is you claiming to be a moderate or independent.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

That's a strange inference, but hell everyone's welcome to their opinion.

---

It doesn't concern you in the slightest that the two original "whistleblowers" aren't even going to testify? Just how partisan are you? This is honestly the most absurd miscarriage of justice I think I have ever seen.

Drag up some anonymous whistleblowers, lie about what the whistleblowers said in order to justify an investigation, get some very conflicting testimony from said witnesses, and then never hear from the original whistleblowers ever again? If this actually results in an impeachment it is the literal definition of someone being railroaded.

But Orange Man bad so who cares.