Originally Posted by
time4fun
ROFL You claimed it on LNET, and you know it. And let's review your last week or so:
1) You incorrectly made the claim that Trump not being in jail means that there's not enough evidence to demonstrate collusion. That's incorrect.
2) You claimed that Mueller and the DoJ could put Trump in jail- which is abjectly false.
3) You implicitly questioned the idea that Trump's foreign policy goals were in line with Russia's goals and out of sync with US needs. You were summarily corrected.
4) When I corrected you- you falsely- and inexplicably- claimed I hadn't answered the question.
5) You also implicitly argued that climate-change-related human displacement isn't a big issue the UN has been reporting on for years. You were corrected.
6) You then pretended like you had asked me for a source because you had....already read a source? That was just you being ridiculous though.
7) You then cited an iDMC article that you believed countered the notion of climate-change-related displacement even though it clearly indicated the biggest issue right now was the result of rural to urban migration- which has been heavily driven by climate-change. Which you would have realized if you had actually read the source you pretended you had read.
Quite the week Stumpy. Maybe you should go read that Psych today article yourself.