Evidently not. Dreaven's reached that point of such severe partisanship that his realty filter has lost all ability to rationalize bias. Imagine being so conspiracy minded that you're unable to perceive the world as it truly is. Honestly I pity him.
Printable View
You both exposed yourselves to be giant hypocrites. Just admit I owned you and move on already.
Gosh.
Like an "independent" commission can't be biased or something? Yeah okay Mr. 5k a year on masks is cheap.
So let me see if I understand your current dumbassery correctly:
Gerrymander by state legislature = bad
Gerrymander by an "independent" commission = good
The "independent" commission has already massively changed the districts based on whining from Democrats, that's anything but "independent" and if you really cared about an "independent" commission you would be pissed that elected officials are trying to sway the commission to go one way or another, but you're not pissed because again you're a giant hypocrite.
State legislatures should be the ones who draw up maps because they are directly responsible to voters and if voters don't like what they are doing they can vote them out of office and replace them. Why would you want an un-elected "independent" commission?
It could be from the census data since that's the new information they received to make this first draft of a map.
You don't know everything that goes into making the district lines and neither do I. Only difference is that you jump to "it must nefarious cause Republicans got it a little worse" and I don't.
I never said that, I said it as way cheaper than the 25k a year you thought they cost. You just can't help but lie.
Where is the gerrymandering? Where is this proof that Democrats swayed the commision to get the districts changed to this?
You not liking how things turned out isn't proof of gerrymandering.