Things that made you laugh today (Political Version)

Printable View

08-24-2021, 07:17 PM
Tgo01

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taernath

Me: Censored for which views, exactly?

Tgo: Oh, you know the ones

Oh you were asking ME for examples? Well I think Alex Jones was censored because of his antics regarding that school shooting, I forget which one it was though.

Pretty sure Diamond and Silk were censored for "medical misinformation."
08-24-2021, 07:38 PM
Tgo01

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neveragain

"I respect people’s freedom, but when you’re talking about a public health crisis ... The time is come, enough is enough." ~ Dr. Fauci Mengele

Christ almighty. He really did say that.

We don't support dictatorships! - drauz
08-24-2021, 08:27 PM
Taernath

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tgo01

Pretty sure Diamond and Silk were censored for "medical misinformation."

Fox News did that. Notoriously liberal Fox News "censored" them, lmao

eta: I have to wonder what kind of stupid shit they were pushing to get fired from Fox. Couldn't be run of the mill vaccine skepticism since half their hosts do that every day. God-given constitutional right to mainline horse steroids maybe?
08-24-2021, 08:35 PM
~Rocktar~

Quote:

Originally Posted by drauz

Sigh, can't even get it right...

You just happened to have a list of "failed" vaccines because you are pro-vaccine....

https://25.media.tumblr.com/50f1f7da...7e13o1_500.gif

Hello retard, those aren't vaccines. They just happen to be medications that were FDA approved for a long time that were pulled. And you fuckwits whine to me about facts and research.

Fuck off.
08-24-2021, 08:39 PM
Ashliana

Quote:

Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~

Hello retard, those aren't vaccines. They just happen to be medications that were FDA approved for a long time that were pulled. And you fuckwits whine to me about facts and research.

Fuck off.

Literally your first example was wrong. Isotretinoin (Accutane) is still on the market, it wasn't "pulled," the original manufacturer stopped selling it themselves.

Or in other words:

https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/...40/347/125.jpg
08-24-2021, 09:10 PM
~Rocktar~

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ashliana

Literally your first example was wrong. Isotretinoin (Accutane) is still on the market, it wasn't "pulled," the original manufacturer stopped selling it themselves.

Or in other words:

sniped the simp cut and paste

Did I say the FDA pulled them? Noooooo, I said they had FDA approval which according to you shitbags makes it ok, and they were not ok and were pulled. Your reading comprehension is somewhere on par with a 4 yr old.

https://www.mdlinx.com/article/10-da...e-fda/lfc-4008
08-24-2021, 09:27 PM
Ashliana

Quote:

Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~

Did I say the FDA pulled them? Noooooo, I said they had FDA approval which according to you shitbags makes it ok, and they were not ok and were pulled. Your reading comprehension is somewhere on par with a 4 yr old.

https://www.mdlinx.com/article/10-da...e-fda/lfc-4008

In response to someone posting a video that said the FDA approved a drug, you responded "well, SOME drugs that were approved WERE pulled." "These were ones that were available for years then got yanked."

Again, isotretinoin remains on the market. One manufacturer deciding not to be in the business of selling it anymore doesn't constitute the drug being pulled, or "yanked," as you retardedly asserted. You can go to any dermatologist and get a prescription today.

All of this is a non-sequitur, as the possibility of a drug being approved and then pulled doesn't mean you have an empirical basis for doubting the COVID vaccine(s). Best of luck coming to terms with reality.

https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/...40/347/125.jpg
08-24-2021, 10:02 PM
Tgo01

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taernath

Fox News did that.

Fox News did that also. Twitter also censored them for much the same reasons.
08-24-2021, 10:09 PM
Taernath

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tgo01

Fox News did that also. Twitter also censored them for much the same reasons.

So what you're saying is there's bipartisan support that they're full of shit.
08-24-2021, 10:26 PM
Tgo01

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taernath

So what you're saying is there's bipartisan support that they're full of shit.

What I'm saying is they were censored.

What I'm also saying is Fox News didn't "censor" them because they can be 100% held liable for anything they say on their news program, whereas Twitter cannot, ergo Twitter is engaging in censorship, Fox News is acting in their own best interest.

And before you start; I also wouldn't give CNN shit if they finally got around to firing Chris Cuomo because he's a huge liability for them. Why they haven't yet makes me wonder if he has dirt on some big wigs at CNN.