On the testimony of a convicted liar? Pretty sure if the Democrats has something substantial or a witness that was even partly believable.. they wouldn’t have put Cohen up first or at all.
He’s worse than an anonymous source...
Printable View
When Mueller finally wraps up this investigation 16 years from now, we're finally going to know for sure about collusion. Well, most people will. Democrats will continue investigating because THERE JUST HAS TO BE SOMETHING DAMMIT!!!!111
Are these the same investigators that found his testimony in front of Congress not to be credible and ended up charging him with lying?
Weird how before, Democrats were “we can’t believe a word Cohen says” and now, because he’s against Trump, he should be believed?
This is a farce, plain and simple. Nothing but a political grandstand by the Democrats.
1. So you're saying federal investigators know when Cohen is telling the truth and when he's lying? I don't think anyone is disputing that.
2. No one is disputing Cohen a liar. That's a known fact. Again, it's all about what evidence he can provide and what he can corroborate, which again, has been verified by federal investigators.
3. It's only a farce to you because your boy Trump is being exposed for the fraud that he is. I'm loving your meltdown though, please don't stop.