https://memegenerator.net/img/images...0/16548311.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
Printable View
https://memegenerator.net/img/images...0/16548311.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
Alas, pointing out your hypocrisy and lack of self-awareness isn't a NOU, no matter how butthurt you get about it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Your inability to read (or failure to understand that doubling down on your own self-own doesn't do anything besides mark yourself as retarded and hypocritical) only reflects on you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
# of times Methais has been unable to reconcile his "videos can constitute walls of text" statement with him posting a video twice the length of the one he criticized me for posting: 5
Isn't it funny how you just got done claiming someone else was relying on a "NOU" strategy, then turned around and did it yourself? It's almost like you have no self-awareness, precisely as I asserted. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
In case you were wondering, that was yet another example of you falling on your face (or being put in your place, as you prefer to think of it), Methais.
NO U is just a mindless tactic that retards like you use unironically when you have nothing else, which is all the time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
In this case, you literally described yourself in that post with pinpoint accuracy. But that would require you to have self awareness in order to realize.
But grats on showing that you're incapable of understanding the difference between a random video posted on its own in a completely separate thread vs. you replying directly to a 30 second video with another video that has several minutes of dialogue, just like how you reply to everything with a wall of randomly bolded text that consists of you shitting your pants and then declaring victory.
You almost had a point, except for the part where you were too stupid to understand basic concepts. So it's time to shit your pants again.
I'm flattered at how hard you're trying to be like me though. Just know ahead of time you'll never be that cool. Or cool at all really.
Fantastic. And the reason you resorted to a NOU immediately after (incorrectly) claiming someone else did one?Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Much to your obvious dismay, pointing out your hypocrisy and lack of self-awareness doesn't constitute a NOU.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
# of times Methais has been unable to reconcile his "videos can constitute walls of text" statement with him posting a video twice the length of the one he criticized me for posting: 6Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Translation: "It isn't fair to point out how my past statements undercut my current ones!" Sorry you're butthurt about your inconsistency getting called out. Perhaps you should pause, and think, next time. But we all know that won't be happening.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Yikes. What a strange, and incredibly cringe-inducing attempt to soothe your bruised ego.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
After explaining the difference, which even Backlash could understand, you've made it clear that you're not capable of processing basic concepts like this.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Except all you ever do is NO U everything said to you, so there's that. Which I don't see changing anytime soon. You call everything else a NO U whether it's a NO U or not. Because you're too stupid to understand things.Quote:
Much to your obvious dismay, pointing out your hypocrisy and lack of self-awareness doesn't constitute a NOU.
Number of times Ashliana tried to be like me: 9487230420394Quote:
# of times Methais has been unable to reconcile his "videos can constitute walls of text" statement with him posting a video twice the length of the one he criticized me for posting: 6
There is no need to lash out because of your own stupidity. You should lash out at yourself. Much like your parents should have, but instead chose to leave you behind a dumpster. Which was probably best for them.Quote:
Translation: "It isn't fair to point out how my past statements undercut my current ones!" Sorry you're butthurt about your inconsistency getting called out. Perhaps you should pause, and think, next time. But we all know that won't be happening.
I probably should have a bit of a bruised ego with a mongoloid like you out there trying to be like me.Quote:
Yikes. What a strange, and incredibly cringe-inducing attempt to soothe your bruised ego.
One day you'll have an original thought of your own. Maybe. But probably not.
TLDR: It's ok to be stupid, Ashliana just stop bragging about it.
I almost got so caught up in Ashliana's deflection that I forgot to remind you that I'm still waiting for you to show me these wall of text right wing memes you speak of.
In before more unhinged rage.
We have 0 interests in Europe other than to close shop and GTFO. Germany buying oil from Russia while not paying their part of the NATO bill.... these are not American allies.Quote:
Originally Posted by Solkern
Alas, your inability to make an argument doesn't constitute someone else's failure to understand basic concepts.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
You accused someone else of a NOU, which wasn't one, then you immediately NOU'd someone else. You may be butthurt as hell that your hypocrisy was pointed out, but it doesn't change anything. You can keep insisting up is down and the sky is purple until the end of time: it doesn't erase history and rewrite reality to suit your delusions.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Yeah.... Framing your repeated failure to reconcile your statements in the style you used, to emphasize your ongoing hypocrisy and lack of self-awareness, isn't "trying to be like you."Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Except I didn't lash out.. but you did, here, once again demonstrating your comically transparent projection, hypocrisy and lack of self-awareness. I couldn't have satirized you more effectively than you just did yourself. Bravo.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
You really didn't think this one out.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Speaking of lacking original thoughts.. you literally just finished trying to turn one of my statements on me, however poorly. You're really going hard on this comical hypocrisy and lack of self-awareness angle. We get it. You don't need to keep doubling down on it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
And finally, we come to the essential distillation of all of our exchanges: The lashing out we all knew you wanted to do, and raises the question why you didn't just do it from the beginning. Since, y'know, you had no actual argument to make, can't get basic facts right, can't reason your way out of a paper bag, and threw like 3 projection-filled accusations in the last page alone of things you were doing, or immediately proceeded to do.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
:rofl:
# of times Methais has been unable to reconcile his "videos can constitute walls of text" statement with him posting a video twice the length of the one he criticized me for posting: 7Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
:rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
The degree to which you've uncritically internalized right-wing talking points is hilarious. You are a poster child of the low-information useful idiots that Russians love. Every single thing you said was wrong.
No credible foreign policy expert, right or left-leaning, believes this. We're advantaged in a thousand ways by our troop presence throughout Europe.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
There is no "NATO bill." Germany doesn't owe NATO a penny. The money Trump kept bloviating about is a noncommittal agreement by NATO signators to spend a certain percentage of their GDP on national defense in the broadest sense. Not money that gets pooled into NATO for mutual defense.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
The EU is absolutely an ally, one that Trump just got through 4 years of damaging our relationship with. You are retarded.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
You act like you haven't been being called a retard by pretty much everyone for years now and that this is some new revelation.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Denial is your only hope of survival though, so I understand why you employ your chronic delusions 24/7.
At least it's entertaining to watch.
It's almost as if you're too stupid to understand that both situations are unrelated, and were in completely different threads even. Actually, it's not "as if," because you really are too stupid.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Here, let's try in a way that even you can hopefully understand. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt (which I always end up regretting, because you're stupid) and assume you already know who this person is:
You're the SJW equivalent of this:
https://media.tenor.com/images/060eb...fa9d/tenor.gif
Translation:Quote:
And finally, we come to the essential distillation of all of our exchanges: The lashing out we all knew you wanted to do, and raises the question why you didn't just do it from the beginning. Since, y'know, you had no actual argument to make, can't get basic facts right, can't reason your way out of a paper bag, and threw like 3 projection-filled accusations in the last page alone of things you were doing, or immediately proceeded to do.
"NO I'M NOT LASHING OUT, YOU ARE LASHING OUT!!!!!" -Ashliana
Like a proper NPC following his code.
You keep lashing while I keep laughing.
https://i.imgur.com/8uFzvpE.gif
Fucking faggots, right?Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
I love how liberals always fall back to making fun of the LGBTQLMNOP people they claim they accept with open arms.
Name one thing the US is reliant upon Europe for?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
I will be waiting on your list of nothing that will be replaced with some empty response that ends with calling me a racist.
Don’t you think this isn’t the right question to ask? Besides pharmaceuticals, machinery, military bases and being America’s largest trading partner. Europe is considered America’s closest friend. While Europe may not be in equal footing with the states, they are still out closest ally and friend. Like with any friendship both parties bring something different to the relationship and neither are on equal footing. It always seems one is getting more out of any relationship than the other.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
Its a joke that he's a prostitute...Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
We are not reliant upon any of those things except the military bases. Is that what you want our economy reliant upon, the never ending expansion of the US military across the globe?Quote:
Originally Posted by Solkern
Gee, I wonder why Russia wants to expand their military?
Watching you desperately flail and lashing out -- only moments after incorrectly claiming the other side was doing so -- says it all. You can't stand having your own statements used against you. And who could blame you? Since you shit them out without a second thought, then twist yourself into pretzels with mental gymnastics trying to make it somehow work out.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
It's almost as if you're too stupid to understand that the same logic applies in both situations, regardless of whether they're related or in different threads. Actually, it's not "as if," because you really are too stupid.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
# of times Methais has been unable to reconcile his "videos can constitute walls of text" statement with him posting a video twice the length of the one he criticized me for posting: 8
Ooh! Look at you -- finally picking up on your error that opened you up to the obvious charge of hypocrisy you've been throwing tantrums about how it's unfair to point out. Tantrums like this:Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
https://media.giphy.com/media/5R2XVo...5dWI/giphy.gif
Watching you getting increasingly butthurt at the fact that pointing out your comically transparent hypocrisy doesn't constitute a NOU:Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
https://media.giphy.com/media/Su0aljmbFVghW/giphy.gif
Fuck the fucking media.
Look at abomination of a news story from CBS:
The word "knife" is literally only mentioned one time:Quote:
Columbus police released more bodycam video Wednesday of the fatal shooting of Black teen Ma'Khia Bryant the day before. Protesters took to the streets of the Ohio capital for the second straight day and night.
Demonstrators gathered in the afternoon and didn't thin out until late Wednesday night, reports CBS Columbus affiliate WBNS-TV. Hundreds marched past or stopped at the Statehouse, the Ohio Supreme Court and police headquarters among other spots, the station said.
Bryant, 16, was shot by officer Nicholas Reardon, officials said Wednesday.
Police initially released some body camera footage of the shooting Tuesday night. They made the additional footage public along with two 911 calls in a press conference on Wednesday, citing "the public's need, desire and expectation to have transparency."
Interim police chief Michael Woods said Wednesday that dispatchers first received a call for help at 4:32 p.m. On the call, a woman told officers that people were trying to fight and stab her and others, according to an audio recording played during the press conference. A second 911 caller also asked police to respond to the scene, but the call ended quickly after the person realized police had just arrived.
Officers arrived on the scene at 4:44 p.m., Woods said. A slowed-down version of body camera footage appears to show Bryant attacking two other people, lunging at one with something in her hand, just after an officer arrived. The officer, identified by Woods as Reardon, fired his weapon several times while Bryant and another girl were struggling against the side of a parked car. A knife could be seen next to Bryant's body after the shooting.
It was unclear what led to the altercation, which was already in progress when the officers arrived.
Bryant's family told WBNS-TV that Bryant was the one who called the police for help, saying people were fighting outside her house. Woods declined to comment on who called 911.
Woods said the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation is investigating the shooting. When the agency has finished its investigation, "the divisional police will conduct an administrative review of the actions of this officer and all officers at the scene," Woods said.
The officer who killed Bryant will be "taken off the street" while the shooting is investigated, Woods said. He also said a decision on whether the officer violated any policy will come after the criminal investigation is complete and sent to a grand jury.
"It's a tragedy. There's no other way to say it," Woods said. "It's a 16-year-old girl. I'm a father, her family is grieving. Regardless of the circumstances associated with this, a teenage girl lost her life yesterday."
Columbus Mayor Andrew Ginther called the shooting a "horrible, heartbreaking situation" and said, "We know from this footage that the officer took action to protect another young girl in the community."
Woods said "deadly force can be used to protect yourself or (for) the protection of a third person. ... Whether this complies with that will be part of that investigation."
"We think it's critically important to share as much information as possible, as quickly as possible," Ginther said. "So, we'll continue to share footage, other information in the hours and days ahead."
The mayor also asked anybody with more information on what happened prior to the shooting "to share that information with the appropriate authorities."
Bryant's mother, Paula Bryant, told WBNS she's "very upset. I'm hurt. I want answers."
"My daughter dispatched Columbus police for protection, not to be a homicide today," Paula said with tears in her eyes.
Ma'Khia was in foster care, she said.
Director of Public Safety Ned Pettus Jr. said Wednesday that he understands the outrage Bryant's family is feeling. "A teenage girl is dead and she is dead at the hands of a police officer," Pettus said. "Under any circumstances, that is a horrendous tragedy."
But Pettus cautioned that "the video shows that there is more to this. It requires us to pause, take a close look at the sequence of events."
"We have to ask ourselves: What information did the officer have? What did he see? How much time did he have to assess the situation?" Pettus said. "And what would have happened if he had taken no action at all?"
A knife could be seen next to her body after the shooting, like it just happened to be there or something.Quote:
A knife could be seen next to Bryant's body after the shooting.
https://cbsnews1.cbsistatic.com/hub/...1419868201.jpg
Fuck the media. Fuck any person pushing this shit that the officer was wrong. And especially fuck Ashliana.
So is this the part where you demonstrate that you don't know the first thing about geopolitics, as if that fact isn't (or shouldn't) be hugely embarrassing to you? Why, precisely, do you think we have military bases throughout Europe? Why do you believe those countries allowed a foreign nation to establish permanent bases on their soil? Because it's mutually beneficial, dingus. They get the benefit of our military protection, and we get the benefit of being able to have a global military presence to contain our adversaries' ambitions, to maintain the global peace that America has economically benefited from more than any other nation, et cetera. Together, the EU ties with our biggest trading partner, and the UK is closest partner in intelligence.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
You being mind-bogglingly ignorant definitely puts your racism into context.
Aww. Butthurt much, Dreaven? I haven't even commented on that case, where the police did nothing wrong. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
And the media didn't do anything wrong in that screeching REEEE! THE MEDIA! post you just shat out, either. Who cares if they only said knife once? They also said:
- people were trying to fight and stab her
- footage appears to show Bryant attacking two other people, lunging at one with something in her hand, just after an officer arrived.
You, as always, are a deluded imbecile.
Just in general fuck you. I don't need no reason.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
I see. Well, the sentiment is mutual. Kudos on glossing over the aspects of your complaints about the media that are totally divorced from reality, though. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
First, those bases are there because Europe proved 2x within 50 years that they are indeed incapable of not causing mass murder.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
I mean as much as your values line up with European values and your support of America's black holocaust, America is the antithesis of Europe. The fact that you support further military expansion so our economy keeps pumping makes it even more fascilicious.
Putting aside your hilariously ignorant lumping in of all Europe together, that's all the more reason we would want to maintain hegemony over them.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
Which values would those be? Gotta love you taking every opportunity to broadcast your racist infantilization of the Black community, though, and your confusion about why they support reproductive rights. And no, America and Europe are fundamentally the same, and both have issues with racism.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
Pointing out that America has benefited (and moreso than any other nation) from the post-WW2 peace we ushered in doesn't equate to "supporting further military expansion so our economy keeps pumping." You not knowing anything about our mutually beneficial arrangement in Europe and the Pacific doesn't confer anything on anyone else.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
But as with opportunities for racism, you never pass up an opportunity for a good straw man argument. :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
Does that matter? You asked for one thing America is reliant on from Europe, I gave you one. I didn’t even include Scientific research. Now because what I gave you, and you don’t agree with.. that’s not good enough for you? Maybe you should have asked the question like this “name one thing america is reliant on from Europe that I support specifically, anything else doesn’t count”
And yes we are indeed reliant on Europe for machinery and pharmaceuticals.
Oh, really.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Close your eyes and place your finger on a map Europe, you will not find an area that has not been soaked with the blood of innocent people.
At least we know where you stand, continued expansion of the military industrial complex and support the ongoing extermination of black Americans. You're literally a dyed in the wool Nazi.
An American.. trying to sanctimoniously lecture Europeans on "the blood of innocent people"..? Whose land do you think you're living on now, and who died to make it ours? :rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
Remarkably stupid, as always, Neveragain. Or, as we should start calling you, Alwaysracist.
If only doubling down on a straw man argument made it somehow not one. Alas.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
Good luck with your racist infantilization of Blacks. Best of luck figuring out why they don't support Republicans, and why they support reproductive rights. And figuring out what the word literally means.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
30 minutes later....Quote:
Originally Posted by Solkern
I realize someone typed out the word "Russia" and you suddenly appear as if some sort of expert.. but you should at least get your story straight.Quote:
Originally Posted by Solkern
Quote:
Originally Posted by Solkern
I was going to post a gif to this.. but then I realized that even though you posted this right after Solkern, you quoted Ashliana.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
But it was still spot fucking on.
Bro.. no it's not.Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
You're calling him a faggot in a derogatory way. You're not the first liberal to do it.. hell, Ashliana does it and he IS a faggot.
If you're going to post it.. then don't pretend it's something different when you know it's not.
Comparing my knowledge on Russia, to anyone else’s on this board? Yeah I’d consider myself an expert. Care to share any relevant life experience, work, and/or study, that would make you more knowledgeable than me on Eastern Europe?Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Still waiting for you to tell us how Trump brought peace to the Middle East.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Exactly, go back to the corner where you belong. You try to talk shit, you get called out, and like a typical uneducated idiot, you resort to deflecting.
There is only 1 person who is claiming they are some expert here.Quote:
Originally Posted by Solkern
It's you.
And that is hilarious.
Thank you.
Every time you post, and take things out of context, yeah it is hilarious. Still waiting for you to tell us how Trump brought peace to the Middle East.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
And since you are stupid, let’s lay out the full context for you. “Compared to anyone else that posts on these forums, yeah I’d consider myself an expert on Russia.”
I’ve done investment banking, and wealth management for HSBC in Russia for 9+ years. Including international corporate finance.
What have you done? Oh that’s right, nothing.
Go back to the corner.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Please tell me anyone on these forums that has more extensive work and life experience in Russia than me. Oh wait, that would be no one.
Your crocodile tears about someone else's supposed homophobia don't convince anyone, señor Boomer, tied as the board's most backwards thinking troglodyte. Similarly, pointing out your continued obsession with other men, that ventures into sexually graphic imagery, doesn't constitute homophobia.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit the Retarded Boomer
As always, you get excitedly ahead of yourself, only to fall flat on your face. Will we be chalking up today to one of your Alzheimer's flare-ups, or just your general stupidity?
You literally claimed that you are some expert on Russia.Quote:
Originally Posted by Solkern
Thank you.. I'm still laughing about it.
And you keep bringing me up.... but I never, ever claimed I was an expert on anything.
That was you. You claimed you were.
And there was laughter.
Easy faggot.... go back to your thread. Let me summon you there... one second.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
And you’re literally an idiot. Thanks for the laughs.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
As long as you vote D you can literally murder black children by the gross, be a KKK grand wizard and stalk under age girls on the internet. For Assliana it's all about the D, baby.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
Going back to what we were discussing. If we cut ourselves off completely from Europe, other than military wise, do you think that would have any positive or negative impact on America? If negative than we obviously rely on Europe.
What's that? You posted there, and it had no effect on whether I post here? Sacre bleu! 'Zi Boomer... 'zi is so confused!Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
As long as you vote R, you can literally conspire with America's enemies, infantilize entire populations in racist fashion, uncritically propagate school shootings. Homophobia, misogyny -- everything's on the table as long as white supremacy is maintained. For Alwaysracist Neveragain, it's always about the R. R for racism, naturally.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
I think it would have a wonderful impact on America not having to support European grifters. It also brings into question what kind of ally Europe is if they would cut off trade with the US for pulling out it's military. Doesn't sound like an ally at all.Quote:
Originally Posted by Solkern
Now we propagate school shootings? LMFAOQuote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Keep killing black babies, Assliana.
Think of the loss of business, just with travel... Europe accounts for almost 30% of our tourism. Hotel industry, airlines, small businesses, corporations would all lose a lot of money. We will lose out on scientific research such as CERN. EtcQuote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
You absolutely do. First, it was by banning even research on gun violence for over 20 years, second by consistently voting against the most basic steps that have near-universal support, like universal background checks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
Keep on disingenuously claiming you care about "black babies" while, in characteristically racist fashion, infantilizing the Black population and discounting what the overwhelming majority of them say, Alwaysracist. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
Inanimate objects can't be violent or cause crimes. As much as you would like to blame the No.2 pencil for your ignorance, it wasn't the pencil.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Assliana logic: The United states was founded on racism, was made wealthy by racism and is systemically racist. We should totally expand the systemically racist countries military across the globe.
Alas, that doesn't address anything that I said. Better luck next time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
No matter how many times you restate this claim, it continues to be a straw man. Sorry you couldn't come up with anything meaningful to say, Alwaysracist.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
There's nothing to address. You want to vilify an inanimate object, that crosses the line of insanity for me as it should for any sane person.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
The object has nothing to do with it. It's that Republicans perpetuate the cycle of gun violence by doing absolutely nothing to stop it, even when their (right-wing) constituencies want it done. Your inability to read doesn't constitute a reasoned position.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
A gun can't be violent, it's an inanimate object.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
You're really bad at reading. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
Democrats are really bad at actually addressing the issues. Only insane people believe inanimate objects act on their own.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
republicans have addressed the issue, you just don't like the fucking answer.
You being forced to double down on straw man after straw man is, as always, hilarious. The fact that you don't seem aware of your own desperate flailing and how retarded it makes you look makes it even funnier.Quote:
Originally Posted by AlwaysRacistNeveragain
Who knew "Wish the Invisible Wizard in the Sky will make gun violence go away!" wasn't a real answer? Oh. Anyone with a brain did, leaving only you conservatives.Quote:
Originally Posted by AlwaysRacistNeveragain
MMhm, how I love the taste of bigotry in the evening.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
I really don't know how we can expect young people to respect another human being when democrats insist that the most innocent among us are not human beings at all.
That's where I would start.
Alas, pointing out that basing policy decisions on Bronze Age goatherder mythology is nonsensical isn't "bigotry."Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
If Republicans actually wanted to reduce the abortion rate, they'd start with comprehensive sex education, including teaching contraceptive use. Guess what they support? Abstinence-only education, based on the above Bronze Age goatherder mythology, with a track record of abject failure.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
Your crocodile tears for the unborn don't impress anyone.
Yes those rules like, thal shall not kill, steal...treat others as you would want to be treated are obviously outdated goat herder mythology. We are in the modern science era where inanimate objects commit crimes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Or we could just make it really easy and just make it illegal to murder babies.
Or you could be an adult, and look at the data, which show that prohibiting abortion doesn't reduce abortion. It pushes it into backalleys. The only effective method would be the ones I laid out, which Republicans oppose on nonsensical religious grounds.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
Neither Christianity nor Judaism came up with those ideals. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
I think Assliana learned a new term today "crocodile tears".
https://media0.giphy.com/media/Za9Dp...JHDI/giphy.gif
Your point?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Well since prohibiting abortions pushed it to back alleys, we should probably make it legal to murder people, steal from people, rape people and just have no laws in general at all, they will just happen in the back alleys anyway.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Won't making gun ownership a crime just push it to the back alleys?
Religion isn't a valid basis for lawmaking in a secular democracy. Republicans base most of their policy on Evangelical priorities completely divorced from reality, with no track record of success, based on ideology. That's the point. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
You're undercutting your own case, not mine. Pro-tip: I never argued "gun ownership should be a crime," whereas you seem very much to want abortion outlawed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
Yes, I want killing babies to be illegal.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Quit lying about gun ownership, twat. Everybody knows what you fucks want. I have yet to meet a gun owner that supports any further gun legislation like Democrats say they do. I have never been able to purchase a firearm without filling out a background check and I have been purchasing guns for 35 years.
Kids used to come to school in the morning with their shotguns in their truck racks, we never fathomed the idea of shooting each other. It's really crazy how guns have managed to grow arms and legs and commit these crimes all on their own.
Quit lying about fertilized eggs and a handful of cells being babies, twat.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
And everyone knows what you fucks want: to control women. Well, sorry, buddy, but the days where people like you decided what everyone else gets to do ended 50 years ago, no matter how many of you get butthurt and go on shooting rampages.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
Expanded background checks are almost universally supported. You know that includes gun owners, right? No? Your fanatical belief in nothing isn't supported? Who knew?Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
You're right, it's a turtle..or maybe a tree. I really like it when pro-baby killers call them parasites.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Almost.Quote:
Expanded background checks are "almost universally supported. You know that includes gun owners, right? No? Your fanatical belief in nothing isn't supported? Who knew?
No, I just expect a modern society to not kill babies.Quote:
Control women
The reality is, when presented with two options, one of which reduces abortion, and the other does nothing, you pick nothing. You get a chance to put your money where your mouth is, and..? Well, that pretty much says it all.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
Is that supposed to mean something? Since, y'know, it doesn't.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
almost universally = oxymoron
Erm.. No, Alwaysracist.
Once again reduced to screaming racist like the impetuous child your mother raised you to be.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
If only accurately identifying you as racist was impetuous. Alas, you earned it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
ROFL.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
Damn Gelston. You're losing your mind aren't you?
I'm saying I support free speech for all, and that juries should not be threatened with violence.
And I'm the communist asshole? ROFL
You should just stop now.
Edit: BTW - that's hate speech. How dare you use China's name in a negative light. You're going to get Nike'd. Lebron's going to call you out. Better watch it.
Suppose your definition of "otherwise objectionable" is different than mine then.Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
Completely divorced from reality is believing inanimate objects can act on their own and a living animate object is not living.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Completely divorced from reality is saying that a man can be a woman and a woman can be a man.
Completely divorced from reality is feeding 3 year olds hormone pills because you feel like they are what they are not.
Completely divorced from reality is teaching children they can be anything except what they are.
Your assertion here would be the thing completely divorced from reality. Since, y'know, it's an obvious straw man argument. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
Psychiatrists and biologists would explain your error here: that what you initially identified as a "man" wasn't actually one. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
Good thing professional medical organizations recommend against puberty blockers for children who have not reached puberty. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
You didn't really think this one through. But let's be charitable and say it's because you decided to spend your Friday evening hopped up on caffeine pills and railing against abortion and trans children. Oh, and :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
Hey Gelston... want to see Commie actions?
https://www.rollcall.com/2021/01/12/...ay-be-elusive/
Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., who stands to become the chairman of the Intelligence Committee, called the actions to ban Trump from social media too late and not nearly enough. He highlighted additional issues that Democrats say Facebook, Twitter and YouTube, which is owned by Google, have failed to address.
“Disinformation and extremism researchers have for years pointed to broad network-based exploitation of these platforms,” Warner said, adding that they “have served as core organizing infrastructure for violent, far-right groups and militia movements. The platforms, researchers say, have helped groups to recruit, organize, coordinate and, in many cases, generate profits.”
Social media companies “have done enduring damage to their own credibility,” Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., told The Washington Post last week. And the attack on the Capitol “will renew and refocus the need for Congress to reform Big Tech,” he said.
Blumenthal, a member of the Judiciary Committee and a longtime critic of Big Tech, told the Post that he blames the companies “for ignoring repeated red flags and demands for fixes.”
I'm wanting Social Media to ALLOW all voices... Democrats want Social Media companies to further REGULATE voices that they decide they disagree with.
Always thought you'd get the difference, but you want to call me a Commie? Get the fuck out of here.
Social media can do whatever they want. It’s their service, don’t like it, don’t use it. Freedom of speech doesn’t apply for private companies. .Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaps
No legitimate biologist or psychologist believes that you can identify as anything, you either are a woman or a man. We have already indentified the psychological disorder for people that believe they are something they are not. Not a single one of the subscribed treatments is for other people to join in the mentally ill persons delusions. In fact friends and family are specifically asked to NOT acknowledge the delusions as it only reinforces the patients illness.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
You have no clue of what you're talking about. You're just spewing fucked up pop pseudo science for political gain, it's sick.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3418019/Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
True hermaphrodite is one of the rarest variety of disorders of sexual differentiation (DSD) and represents only 5% cases of all. A 3-year-old child presented with left sided undescended testis and penoscrotal hypospadias. Chordee correction was performed 18 months back, elsewhere. At laparotomy Mullerian structures were present on left side. On right side testis was normally descended into the scrotum
So confused that you post a genetic disorder and not a mental disorder, it's really simple to distinguish between the two.Quote:
Originally Posted by Solkern
You should probably stick to banking.Quote:
True hermaphroditic humans do not exist, but pseudohermaphrodism does, where an individual has both male and female external genital organs, sometimes at the same time. Female embryos exposed to high levels of androgens (the male hormones) develop female internal reproductive organs but male external genitalia. Alternately, genetic defects cause children to be born with female external genital organs, which change at puberty, with the development of a penis and the closure of the false vagina.
Read more: Hermaphrodite - Hermaphrodism In Humans - Female, Male, Organs, and Sex - JRank Articles https://science.jrank.org/pages/3310...#ixzz6sxZBTtkP
You mentioned biologist. A biologist won’t deal with mental disorders imo.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
I didn't mention biologist, that was your friend Assliana.Quote:
Originally Posted by Solkern
Pretty sure that’s you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
That's me saying no legitimate biologist uses the "science" where plants and animals self identify.Quote:
Originally Posted by Solkern
Just a small example of the insanity people like Assliana and Solkern want us all to join in:
Fucked up college student pushing their pseudo bullshit "science": Mr. Carson to you identify as being black?
Ben Carson: I am black.
You didn't really read what I wrote -- or you didn't understand it -- which would be no surprise. Spoiler Alert: You aren't accurately representing the state of either biology or psychiatry. Half a second of searching would bring you to the DSM-5 (or the ICD-11, the international equivalent), which says the complete opposite of everything you just said. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
Also wrong, as transgender notions aren't considered "delusions." That would your retarded ideology at work again. The APA's DSM-5 literature specifically recommends:Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
Quote:
Originally Posted by APA
How unfortunate for your position.Quote:
Originally Posted by APA, DSM-5
Your willful ignorance doesn't constitute a reasoned position, no matter how angry you get about it. Similarly, trying to pre-empt the inevitable charge that you're an idiot shitting out pseudoscience doesn't change the fact that you can't cite a single credible psychiatric source to back up your position.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
Then again, nobody is surprised by an uneducated, ignorant rant from a right-wing ideologue who looks like this:
https://i.imgur.com/FOdQkif.png
:rofl: Were you voted "most likely to blow up an abortion clinic" in school?
A counter to be that would I guess if you said something that really pissed me off and I was like man, fuck Solkern, and I went on social media platforms and said "Hey, fuck this guy. He lives on 123 Retarded Commie Ln" and now you had people physically bothering you. Whatever social media platform in question, doesn't agree with you politically, so they're just like nah we're leaving it up. Because like you said, they can do whatever they want.Quote:
Originally Posted by Solkern
Depending on the state, doxing can be illegal. You can also make some money off them via civil suits. That is why they'll generally take it down immediately upon report.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stolis
I acknowledge and agree, but also, they don't always take it down. For as many times as they take it down, there are likely just as many others that don't. With as fast as things spread on social media, you just need an asshat like a Lebron James putting up a photo of someone, and the wildfire can just spread. He can delete a post, but people can re-post the image and it becomes a hassle to keep it from spreading.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
What would be really interesting would be for Assliana to tell us how many men his mother shuffled in and out of his life to cause so much irreparable psychological damage.
Your mother created a racist that believes in fantasy over science, so...Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
That violates plenty of laws, where I could call the police for harassment. but yeah... it’s their service, their terms and conditions that YOU agree to, when YOU sign up. Almost all social media platforms in their Terms and conditions can remove you for any reason they want.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stolis
If I want to start a left wing social media platform, where the terms and conditions allow only left wing people to join. guess what? I can kick any right wing person off it, any time I want. Because it’s my business, and in my terms and conditions state that, and YOU agreed to it when you signed up. Because your first amendment only stops the government from censoring speech, not private companies.
Join in what?Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
I don't use any social media, haven't in over 15 years. I know what they do and how they do it. Fuck that noise.Quote:
Originally Posted by Solkern
Doesn't mean I want them regulating other peoples voices simply based on their political leanings. No one deserves their ideas to be censored, or the supported censoring by our government (like I posted above).
Hey Gelston,
You were right man... no fear about the Jury at all.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/anonymous...111309695.html
Thank goodness that Judge had some sense and kept their names private. Should have done a full sequester, but at least they had some protections in place.
Removing 230 will literally increase censorship. You dont have a grasp on what they do and how they do itQuote:
Originally Posted by Shaps
Actually I do. Currently the companies are able to remove whatever they want WHILE protected.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
230 should be amended to protect political speech if the company presents itself as a platform. Currently they censor political speech (on both sides, though tilted). Very few companies control a global monopoly, and to state otherwise is just naïve.
What you don't get - or you all keep ignoring - is I am FOR companies protected by section 230. I am AGAINST companies that abuse the protections to regulate peoples speech, because it directly benefits their narrative and suppresses peoples right to civil discourse.
I am also against what Biden and the Democrats want to do to section 230. 230 does not need to be removed. Ensuring companies do not manipulate it is the issue.
You would think most could understand the nuance of such an idea, but apparently not.
And before you say whatever:
https://www.theverge.com/21273768/se...ree-moderation
"President-elect Joe Biden is less vocal than Trump about Section 230. But he’s also not a fan of the law. In January 2020, Biden proposed revoking Section 230 completely. “The idea that it’s a tech company is that Section 230 should be revoked, immediately should be revoked, number one. For Zuckerberg and other platforms,” Biden said. “It should be revoked because it is not merely an internet company. It is propagating falsehoods they know to be false.”
That is AUTHORITARINISM. That shit is fucked up. I am not for that at all. So stop trying to change what I'm stating.
SIMPLE STATEMENT:
KEEP 230
ENSURE SOCIAL MEDIA SITES DON'T ABUSE THE PROTECTIONS IT AFFORDS
The Left wants to get rid of 230 so they can further control it. That's AUTHORITARINISM.
Edit: Hey Alfster... over there -------------------------> Thanks.
How nice that you now support §230. How unfortunate that you still don't understand what it allows, since no protection is being "abused." You don't have an absolute right to a private company's platform, period.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaps
If you want to advocate a change in the law, then do so. Whining about how a company is "abusing" a law you don't understand doesn't mean anything.
You are a fucking moron. Nothing else to add.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Translation: "I can't refute anything that you said, but I sure hate that you said it." Y'know, since you're a fucking moron. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaps
I mean...it is kind of pointless to "refute" something when it's just so blatantly wrong. Which you are. You clearly have absolutely no idea what 230 is, the protections it provides, or how companies are supposed to operate in regards to 230.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Saying shit like "You don't have an absolute right to a private company's platform, period." flat out proves everything I just said above because that is not at all what is being discussed.
It's okay, Ashliana, not everyone has to know everything, but have some damn dignity and admit you don't know what you're talking about and are instead just repeating some talking points you heard on NPR or from Chuck Todd or something.
And once again this isn't an invitation to have an argument with me, most likely I won't be reading whatever eye bleeding response you are typing up for this.
You, Rocktar, Shaps, have repeatedly embarrassed yourselves on this topic. You don't know the first thing about the law. And not coincidentally, my stance happens to match those of the civil liberties groups that specialize in the topic, like the EFF's, ACLU's, etc.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Yours match with..? Is it bat-shit insane right-wing talking heads with no background in either law or tech? (Ding, ding, ding, ding!)
Trying to pretend you have the high ground when you couldn't actually demonstrate a single thing is hilariously stupid, though, Dreaven -- even for you. And that's saying something.
You not being able to follow what's being discussed doesn't confer anything on anyone else. Neither does this particular exchange exist in a vacuum outside the related aspects of §230 that the aforementioned have been discussing, so..Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
That would be a moot point, since one can't have an "argument" with someone who didn't actually lay out a position except "Look how wrong you are!" Best of luck scrounging the dregs of your syphilis-rotted brain for an argument, though. We already know you won't be coming up with one.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Odd how the moron above doesn't comment on what JB and the Lefties want to do to Section 230. Or maybe it's not odd.
Nope, concluded it's not odd... morons tend to do things like that, so hence it would just be normal.
Back to ignoring "he/she who will not be named". I nearly fell into the trap of affording "he/she who will not be named" a chance to spread their insanity.
That's not how ignoring works.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaps
You're bad at this.
LOL no, you're taking it how you want to take it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
You should know.. it's not how it's said, it's how it's perceived.Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
You need to be reeducated apparently. Your acceptance of homophobic slurs will no longer be tolerated. Due to your acceptance of such terms, your bigotry is proven, and you will be punished for the hate that fills your heart.
Your reeducation Power Point will be e-mailed to you shortly. Failure to complete it, will result in fines and/or jail time.
#WOKE #CHANGE #FEELINGSMATTER #CANADA
Biden's comments on 230 were stupid, but didn't address the same aspects that the right-wing has incorrectly been hyperventilating about. It's no surprise, though, since people across the aisle often don't understand what free speech is, or isn't, and similarly don't understand what 230 does, or doesn't, do.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaps
As Bhaal said, you don't seem to know what ignoring actually is, though. Best of luck with that.
Explain it to me in detail then. Explain it to me like you didn't mean to lead the reader to see this has a homosexual thing.Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
https://media.tenor.com/images/5899d...faf6/tenor.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
https://media.giphy.com/media/XHr6LfW6SmFa0/giphy.gif
https://media.giphy.com/media/l4Fsly...vLQA/giphy.gif
https://media.giphy.com/media/I7p8K5EY9w9dC/giphy.gif
At least Bhallizmo was "brave" enough to attempt a response. It took him a month to figure it out.. but at least he tries.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhaalizmo
It took me a month to have enough time to waste on responses to you. I know it's hard for you to form sentences through your advanced tardation and dementia. But you did a pretty good job this time. Go tardbandit go.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
This would be a more clever response if you didn’t post multiple times a day to yourself in your obsessed with Trump thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhaalizmo
Tell me more about it Mr. 39,315 postsQuote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Make up a buncha stuff about me too. I love it when you just make shit up about people. It's so frothy mouthed manic that it's just damned good entertainment.
I'm not the one claiming I have better things to do, that's all you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhaalizmo
It must be so embarrassing living your life. Stepping on so many rakes you yourself placed in your path and the only person who will ask if you're okay is Ashliana of all people.
There we go, I knew you'd whip out some rando-fabrication soon.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Thanks, you've been mildly entertaining while being entirely predictable.
So you didn't just claim you had better things to do for a month than to reply to ParkBandit in this thread even though you're posting multiple times a day to yourself in your "I secretly love Trump" thread?Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhaalizmo
Again if you ever wonder why the only person who takes you even remotely seriously is Ashliana, wonder no more!
Nope.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Nope.
Nope.
... and go fuck yourself cretin
https://media.giphy.com/media/44Eq3Ab5LPYn6/giphy.gif
Someone is melting down. Who knew the easily triggered buffoon would be so easily triggerable?Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhaalizmo
"I was too busy" is something time4fun would say.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhaalizmo
Weird.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Which part was made up? Be specific. Extra points if you can do it without being big mad.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhaalizmo
That's also something that you say.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Weird.
Are you coming down with Alzheimer's, like PB?
lol you're big madQuote:
Originally Posted by Bhaalizmo
Let's find out. Quote any post where I said anything resembling Bhaalizmad saying "It took me a month to have enough time to waste on responses to you."Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
We all know that you won't, and you'll just concede in the form of deflection and keep shitting your pants like usual and then decide that you shitting your pants = putting me in my place, so no surprise there.
Feel free to use this post as a template for your next one.
There's a reason you picked that line, and not the one I actually responded to: You characterizing what Bhaal said as "I was too busy," along the lines of which you've used repeatedly, as mental gymnastics, to soothe your bruised ego about why you often just can't be bothered to defend your comically retarded positions.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
I absolutely love that you're Big Mad about my having used the phrase put you in your place in the past, but alas, it's easy to find examples of what I was referring to.Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Mad Methais
Here. You. Go.
No need. It was easy to put you in your place without doing that this time. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
It was literally me paraphrasing Bhaalizmo you fucking idiot. :lol: Do you not know what that means? Jesus Christ you're dumb as fuck.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
But I'll play along with your ultra retardedness for fun anyway. I'm pretty sure I'll be finished taking this dump by the time I click post. Which I'm sure that will hurt your feelings in some sort of "I'm too busy" kind of way.
Let's actually quote it so it's here to see. Because there's a reason why you didn't:Quote:
"I have better shit to do" doesn't mean "I'm too busy." I wasn't too busy, I just didn't feel like it, because there were, shockingly enough, better things to do. If I felt like dealing with your extreme retardedness, I could have still chosen to, because I wasn't "too busy."Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
That was easy. You'll have a meltdown over this anyway and mental gymnastics all over the place, but let's move on...no wait, is it because I said you should try logging off here and there? Probably both. You'll deflect everything anyway in your incoming meltdown reply, so we'll never actually get an answer.
Let's quote this one too:Quote:
Nothing at all here about being "too busy." Or are you just butthurt over me saying I skip 99% of your posts? Yes, it's definitely that. That isn't because I'm "too busy" either. Which everyone but you will be able to process. Here comes another meltdown. Poor Ashliana.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-kgLJyAdff...0/butthurt.gif
Anyway, moving on...
And this one too:Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
So the only possible thing I can come up with here is...
Or was it me saying I skim through your posts? That's not a "too busy" thing either. Poor Ashliana is upset again. Here comes meltdown #3, possibly 4, in your reply.Quote:
Lack of interest isn't the same thing as inability.
Anyway, please point out where anything resembling "I'm too busy" is in any of those posts. I made it easy for you by already quoting them here instead of just linking them like you did, so that's like 1% of the work already done for you.
This is the pinnacle of all your butthurt to date.
You sure did put me in my place.
https://i.gifer.com/Ksqj.gif
Dumbass.
And I was mocking you for criticizing him, since you've done the same thing you're criticizing him for -- without a shred of irony, shame or self-awareness you fucking idiot. :lol: Do you not know what that means? Jesus Christ you're dumb as fuck.Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Mad Methais
Isn't it funny how you're constantly criticizing me for using your replies as a template -- which you did here? Not that I mind -- unlike you -- but it's great that you provided a second consecutive case of your abject hypocrisy and lack of self-awareness for me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
That's precisely what it means, and none of the mental gymnastics you did change that. It's you twisting yourself into a logical pretzel about why you're just much too busy to bother making coherent arguments -- despite posting daily, and being the second most prolific poster on the forum.Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Mad Methais' Mental Gymnastics About Why Saying "I'm Too Busy" Doesn't Count When HE Says It
It relates to your mental gymnastics about your demonstrated inability to defend your profoundly retarded statements. That shouldn't have to be explained to you, but if you weren't this retarded, we wouldn't be rehashing this same point for the tenth time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Your mental gymnastics still don't change the past. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
It's hilarious that you spent however long it took you to write that up, and pour over your old posts, for the best defense you could come up with is "I didn't LITERALLY say the words 'I'm just too busy for you!'" despite saying words to that effect each time. Which is precisely why I started off this exchange with:Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais, Pretending His Wishes Change History
In bright, red bold just for you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Thanks for making it comically trivial to put you in your place, as always.
Dumbass.
https://media.giphy.com/media/KbOpwqSuMLQ7S/giphy.gif
That's a lot of words to skim over just to hear say you failed but you wanted to not fail so badly for once that you just can't accept it and are extra mad now. I know it upsets you greatly, but you can't decide for other people what they're saying and insist "YES THAT'S WHAT YOU MEANT!!" especially when you're already a hugely unstable retard with massive mental issues who already struggles with understanding basic words and concepts.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
https://i.imgur.com/zBcAXkD.gif
EDIT: As for how long that post took me, it took less time than it took me to finish taking the dump I was already taking when I started replying. So...not long at all. It was a light day.
You were retarded for criticizing Bhaal's "busy" comment, since you yourself use that excuse to rationalize your inability to argue.Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Mad Methais, Upset His Lack of Self-Awareness Was Called Out
No matter how transparently butthurt you are that your words were used against you, no matter how many times you gnash your teeth in anger, your wishes still don't have the power to warp and twist history or reality to suit your delusions.
Better luck next time.
You live in a chronic statue of butthurt, and this is exactly how you act when you're more butthurt than usual, because you kick the projection into overdrive like clockwork.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
It's very easy to spot and predict to literally everyone except you. And perhaps Bhaalizmo since he's too busy shining up your dildos for you. Does he have an affinity for couches by any chance?
You could have just summed it up with that and saved yourself some typing time while freeing up more F5 time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Pro-tip: Preemptively claiming the other person is projecting when you're projecting like crazy doesn't erase your projection. You got on here hopping mad this morning. It wouldn't be Methais without the hilarious lack of self-awareness, though.Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Mad Methais
Yikes. Best of luck dealing with that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
And stay Big Mad, Methais.
Speaking of projection, here's some more:
Go take a shower. It's been weeks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Speaking of projection, here's some more:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
As always, my statements are observations of your behavior. Yours are fantasy based on wishes. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Mad Methais
This is correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
You certainly have. Best of luck with that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Gosh, is this you putting me in my place? Asking for a friend.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
No, you were previously put in your place with your hypocrisy about criticizing Bhaal for something you've done repeatedly. You tried to wish it away with mental gymnastics, which failed, because you don't know how to argue. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
What about now? Are you putting me in my place again?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
You had to have things explained to you like a child, so yes, it was, again. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
You had to have things explained to you like a child, so yes, it was, again. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
What about now? Am I being put in my place yet again?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
You had to have things explained to you like a child, so yes, it was, again. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Interesting.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Who else have you put in their place recently? This is super fascinating.
Shall I provide you with a Methais-style citation? :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
No, provide me an Ashliana style citation because I enjoy laughing at you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Alas, you set the standard of evidence, much to your obvious dismay. Unless you'd like to admit you were retarded?Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Translation: "I can't produce jack shit like usual, because I'm a mentally ill retard who wants to have a real period soooooooooooooooo bad omg!!!!!"Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
# of times Methais has opted not to revoke the standard of evidence he established while crying about how someone is holding him to his own words: 7Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
There's a reason you didn't, Methais. You're stuck between a rock and a hard place. You have to keep pretending you weren't given an easy way to make me put up or shut up, but realize that I wouldn't be offering it if I didn't have the list of examples ready to go as soon as you concede your earlier behavior was retarded.
... except you don't seem to realize that your ongoing inability to reconcile your current position with your earlier statements -- and the ensuing butthurt you keep radiating because you can't stand your own words being used against you -- still makes you look like an idiot.
Dear Methais.. please take this back and forth to the special Ashliana thread where we force It to post.
Thank you.
Best of luck dealing with those control issues, RC.
It does make him super mad, doesn't it? :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
... You really didn't think that one out. Not that you think anything out, given how you're constantly undermining your own argument, but ... :rofl:
See? Super mad, without even having to do anything yet. :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Meanwhile, in Methais land:Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais, Firm In His Belief That His Wishes Will Soon Change Reality
https://media.giphy.com/media/Cd9XcHdZEIcaA/giphy.gif
Honestly, it's easier to say what doesn't trigger him...Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Oh, dear. Your attempt to keep your nonsense in the other thread doesn't seem to be panning out. What will you do now? :rofl:
Is no one going to talk about the hero of Kenosha?
Looks like the most vocal of our social justice warriors stopped talking much about social justice starting around January 20th. Weird. Otherwise I'm sure they would be here cheering on his prosecution for defending himself.Quote:
Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage
I'm wondering if he'll walk. So far the prosecution has looked like a bunch of amateurs. But let's get real there is no way politics isn't on the mind of the jury.
Not a lawyer obviously. But all it takes is 1 juror to disagree right? Prosecution has a big task to get all 12 on the same page, especially with as eventful as that evening was and all the video of him being attacked. I frankly hope he walks so that rioters and terrorists know that there are consequences to their actions and it's not a free for all every time a person of color gets wrongfully killed.
Takes just one juror to not allow themselves to be bullied by the others and agree to a hung jury. The prosecution could still decide to prosecute him again though in the case of a hung jury.Quote:
Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage
LOL... this made me laugh today.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Your nonsense has been contained.
Permanently.
:rofl::rofl::rofl:
I honestly hope that Minneapolis does the right thing and defunds the police as they have on the ballot today.
I live far enough away to not be affected by this change and would love to see it in action.
Do the right thing today, Minneapolis.
https://i.imgur.com/Tma1neB.pngQuote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
https://thumbs.gfycat.com/LateLeafyF...rd-max-1mb.gif
https://i.imgur.com/PVpz2rf.png
Well this is a let down.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
I'm actually shocked it failed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
My guess is because Twitter and the real world are usually drastically different realities. Mainly because only one is actual reality.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
This is correct. To expand, what a lot of people didn't understand is that included in the proposal was a city council power grab, that would take oversight of the police away from the mayor and give it to the city council. The city council in Minneapolis is not a group I'd want to give more power to. Besides, the system already leaves very little power in the hands of the mayor. I think if they had stuck to the issue without the power grab attemp it may have passed, because the Minneapolis police do pretty much suck, and some sort of change is in order. I live in St Paul where I think our city council and mayor function way better.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
I feel like a lot of people keep forgetting that one of the guys killed by Rittenhouse was a pehophile. He was a convicted child rapist. I'm glad that dude is dead.
The other guy was a wife beater. He tried to choke his spouse to death. I'm glad that dude is dead.
The third guy that didn't die was once arrested for being intoxicated with a firearm. Okay, he made a dumb choice. Luckily he survived.
And wasn't it the 3rd guy that drew a weapon on Rittenhouse to shoot him at point blank range?Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
The third guy was armed with a weapon in his hand, he didn't aim it at Rittenhouse I don't believe, but he kept walking towards him. I feel if Rittenhouse would have turned and run the dude would have killed him.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Yup. The guy pretended to surrender so Rittenhouse put his gun down, the coward then pulled a gun on him which is when Rittenhouse disarmed him.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
If you see somebody with a gun walking toward you, you can shoot them. Good to know.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
But only if you already have a gun yourself, in which case you should be very careful not to walk in the direction of any other person.
If you see someone chase after you to attack you, but then they hold their hands up to show "Look! I mean you no harm!" only to then pull out a pistol and point it at you after you have lowered your weapon then yeah, yeah you can go ahead and shoot them.Quote:
Originally Posted by ClydeR
Your reductionist arguments are still just as tiresome as always.
That's something you don't have to worry about.Quote:
Originally Posted by ClydeR
It's not like you are able to shoot a gun.. your limp wrist would shatter.
Leftists (except Orthin) love pedophiles because "love is love" or some stupid shit, at least as long as the pedophile(s) in question hate Trump.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
I think my profile pic gives away my proclivities but even I draw the line at messing with kids (both of the baby goat and human ilk) so not ALL leftistsQuote:
Originally Posted by Methais
You're a massive gaylord.Quote:
Originally Posted by ClydeR
https://media0.giphy.com/media/8TCeW...5D5yaK/200.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Everyone knows what Ric does next.
I have edited my post to reflect this, good sir..Quote:
Originally Posted by Orthin
Greatly appreciated!! Now back to banging goats!Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais