New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. Bruen

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

The county where the shooting took place took a hard stance on protecting gun owners rights to murder indiscriminately.

---

Wrong.

How are you this fucking retarded?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

Murder is a crime in every single state in the country.

How are you this fucking stupid?

---

And every state in the country has laws pertaining to their safe ownership and operation of firearms and here you are spouting some nonsense about the Constitution being some blanket gun ownership right, when in fact it specifically prescribes the when and how guns shall be owned. The Constitution says plainly well regulated militias, not some guy who wants to murder innocents, yet you protect his right to murder indiscriminately.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

And every state in the country has laws pertaining to their safe ownership and operation of firearms and here you are spouting some nonsense about the Constitution being some blanket gun ownership right, when in fact it specifically prescribes the when and how guns shall be owned. The Constitution says plainly well regulated militias, not some guy who wants to murder innocents, yet you protect his right to murder indiscriminately.

---

The SCOTUS disagrees with your interpretation of the 2nd amendment.

US citizens have 200+ years of precedence and codification on their side to own and bear arms.

Like I said.. if you want to ban guns from law abiding citizens, it will require a Constitutional Amendment.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

The SCOTUS disagrees with your interpretation of the 2nd amendment.

US citizens have 200+ years of precedence and codification on their side to own and bear arms.

Like I said.. if you want to ban guns from law abiding citizens, it will require a Constitutional Amendment.

---

A super majority in today's environment? LULZ.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

Another example of why federal level gun control, including multi-year red flag laws are an absolute necessity in an age of gun violence and hate-motivated attacks. Colorado's law only lasts 364 days.



https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...o-Springs.html

---

After Darrell Brooks used his vehicle to drive through a Christmas parade, did you whing for federal laws outlawing cars? I mean that guy had red flag law written all over him.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage

After Darrell Brooks used his vehicle to drive through a Christmas parade, did you whing for federal laws outlawing cars? I mean that guy had red flag law written all over him.

---

I think that after Harvey Weinstein all Leftist should be on a watch list and not allowed within 5 feet of kids. If not locked up properly and monitored, DFS should remove their kids and put the kids into protective custody before a hearing is held. We need Red Hand laws. If it saves just one kid from a Leftist molester, it's worth it. AMIRITE? Same "logic/reasoning"

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

The SCOTUS disagrees with your interpretation of the 2nd amendment.

US citizens have 200+ years of precedence and codification on their side to own and bear arms.

Like I said.. if you want to ban guns from law abiding citizens, it will require a Constitutional Amendment.

---

One SCOTUS compromised of an ultra conservative majority disagrees with PRIOR SCOTUS rulings and the Constitution. Let's wait they lose the majority and their ruling is overturned.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~

I think that after Harvey Weinstein all Leftist should be on a watch list and not allowed within 5 feet of kids. If not locked up properly and monitored, DFS should remove their kids and put the kids into protective custody before a hearing is held. We need Red Hand laws. If it saves just one kid from a Leftist molester, it's worth it. AMIRITE? Same "logic/reasoning"

---

Ooo. Same with all those priests the right puts on a pedestal

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

One SCOTUS compromised of an ultra conservative majority disagrees with PRIOR SCOTUS rulings and the Constitution. Let's wait they lose the majority and their ruling is overturned.

---

You are welcome to move to Oregon if you don’t want to wait for tyranny to infringe on civil liberties.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

One SCOTUS compromised of an ultra conservative majority disagrees with PRIOR SCOTUS rulings and the Constitution. Let's wait they lose the majority and their ruling is overturned.

---

Only brain dead, emotional, estrogen filled losers like you believe that the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution is talking about the military. It makes zero sense in the context of the time and writing.

But you never let stuff like making sense stop you from making a "point" have you?

Fucking retard.