Latrinsorm
04-20-2015, 07:02 PM
I talk a lot about empiricism, and I thought it would be nice to give some love to the people who invented it.
Muslims.
An object in motion will stay in motion. - Avicenna aka Abū ʿAlī al-Ḥusayn ibn ʿAbd Allāh ibn Al-Hasan ibn Ali ibn Sīnā (b. 980)
Force is proportional to acceleration. - Abu'l-Barakāt al-Baghdādī aka Baruch ben Malka (b. 1080)
For every action there is an opposite reaction. - Avempace aka Abû Bakr Muḥammad Ibn Yaḥyà ibn aṣ-Ṣâ’igh at-Tûjîbî Ibn Bâjja al-Tujibi (b. 1095)
The three laws of Isaac Newton (b. 1642)
An object in motion will stay in motion, and an object at rest will stay at rest.
Force equals mass times acceleration.
For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
A quote of Newton's whose meaning is sometimes disputed:
"If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants."
.
Everyone knows the Greeks (http://www.amazon.com/The-Lagoon-Aristotle-Invented-Science/dp/0670026743) invented (http://www.ask.com/history/invented-science-83770ca78cb04cbf) science (http://onpoint.wbur.org/2014/09/29/aristotle-science-philosophy-greece), but actually no! Their astronomy was copied from the Sumerians, as it would in turn be copied by the Romans. Aristotle himself advocated a brand of science totally foreign to what we call science today: rational science. (Ironically, this form of science was significantly more empirical than that which preceded it!) The reasoning he offered was impeccable, thus the West accepted it for two thousand years. How could you disagree? Well... because it turned out to be completely wrong. The Islamic world had no geopolitical need to champion the Greeks, and so they were free to embrace the science that actually worked: empirical science. It is on their backs that the Renaissance was built, but for obvious reasons Europeans were compelled to credit this to ancient Rome as opposed to contemporary Islam, and that transparently fraudulent history continues to this day.
These things happen.
Muslims.
An object in motion will stay in motion. - Avicenna aka Abū ʿAlī al-Ḥusayn ibn ʿAbd Allāh ibn Al-Hasan ibn Ali ibn Sīnā (b. 980)
Force is proportional to acceleration. - Abu'l-Barakāt al-Baghdādī aka Baruch ben Malka (b. 1080)
For every action there is an opposite reaction. - Avempace aka Abû Bakr Muḥammad Ibn Yaḥyà ibn aṣ-Ṣâ’igh at-Tûjîbî Ibn Bâjja al-Tujibi (b. 1095)
The three laws of Isaac Newton (b. 1642)
An object in motion will stay in motion, and an object at rest will stay at rest.
Force equals mass times acceleration.
For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
A quote of Newton's whose meaning is sometimes disputed:
"If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants."
.
Everyone knows the Greeks (http://www.amazon.com/The-Lagoon-Aristotle-Invented-Science/dp/0670026743) invented (http://www.ask.com/history/invented-science-83770ca78cb04cbf) science (http://onpoint.wbur.org/2014/09/29/aristotle-science-philosophy-greece), but actually no! Their astronomy was copied from the Sumerians, as it would in turn be copied by the Romans. Aristotle himself advocated a brand of science totally foreign to what we call science today: rational science. (Ironically, this form of science was significantly more empirical than that which preceded it!) The reasoning he offered was impeccable, thus the West accepted it for two thousand years. How could you disagree? Well... because it turned out to be completely wrong. The Islamic world had no geopolitical need to champion the Greeks, and so they were free to embrace the science that actually worked: empirical science. It is on their backs that the Renaissance was built, but for obvious reasons Europeans were compelled to credit this to ancient Rome as opposed to contemporary Islam, and that transparently fraudulent history continues to this day.
These things happen.