PDA

View Full Version : Greatest Country in the World Sports



Latrinsorm
07-06-2014, 04:46 PM
In terms of professional men's team sports, there are three global (soccer, volleyball, basketball) and three international (baseball in the American sphere, cricket in the British sphere, hockey in the Frigid sphere). Which country is the best across all six?

All six sports have an international governing body, and all six bodies give global rankings. However, these rankings are not based on consistent models: soccer, volleyball, basketball, and baseball use roughly the same, hockey has a much more forgiving metric for sub-elite countries, and cricket is its own deal that I'll get into later. If we take the average of the top four countries and divide any given country into that average, we so happen to get 20 countries with a total of 1 or higher. (For Great Britain I used England's soccer score.)


soccer base basket volley total country
0.79 1.15 1.37 0.63 3.95 USA
1.14 0.14 1.29 0.11 2.68 Spain
0.95 0.16 0.32 1.19 2.63 Brazil
0.68 0.03 0.51 1.18 2.41 Russia
0.90 0.08 0.71 0.59 2.29 Argentina
0.85 0.32 0.11 0.99 2.27 Italy
0.27 0.96 0.01 0.59 1.84 Cuba
0.48 1.06 0.03 0.18 1.75 Japan
1.00 0.12 0.21 0.42 1.74 Germany
0.75 0.66 0.00 0.08 1.49 Netherlands
0.57 0.00 0.28 0.58 1.44 Serbia
0.70 0.04 0.41 0.20 1.35 France
0.40 0.21 0.34 0.22 1.17 Australia
0.22 0.59 0.07 0.27 1.16 Canada
0.87 0.14 0.00 0.11 1.13 Colombia
0.42 0.48 0.04 0.15 1.10 Korea
0.52 0.44 0.05 0.08 1.09 Venezuela
0.55 0.00 0.43 0.04 1.02 Turkey
0.84 0.08 0.10 0.00 1.01 Great Britain
0.36 0.01 0.03 0.61 1.01 Poland

Values taken from FIFA (June 2014), IFAB (not listed so my guess is 2014), FIBA (Sep 2013, they're lazy), and FIVB (Jan 2014) respectively.

Cricket is complicated because there are 4 different kinds of cricket: Test, ODI, Twenty20, Duck Bowling. (One of those I just made up.) It's also complicated because the governing body (ICC) doesn't give the raw score for everyone but just does rankings, and even those are usually only the top countries. However, it turns out to not matter too much because the big boys of cricket are Australia, England, India, New Zealand, Pakistan, South Africa, and Sri Lanka... only two of whom made it into our top 20. The only full list of countries I could manage was for ODI (http://icc-live.s3.amazonaws.com/cms/media/about_docs/521e0c2fc00ce-ICC%20Global%20Rankings%2018%20August%202013.pdf) style, and we'll use that in a minute.

Hockey's ranking metric (by way of the IIHF) is incompatible with the other four. How incompatible is it? By their metric, Italy is as good at hockey as the Dominican Republic is at baseball. Obviously that's not going to work for us. What I did instead was look at the past five Olympics for medalists: Canada is the clear #1, then there are five others that are all pretty close (Sweden, USA, Finland, Czech Republic, Russia). Looking at the World Championships over the last 10 years this slightly overrates Canada and the USA.

The only team that's even mildly respectable in both sports is Canada and behind them us, everyone else is at best great at one and terrible at the other (Russia, Australia) or terrible at both (Spain). This leads me to the following estimations:

Countries between 2 and 3, from highest to lowest
Spain, Brazil, Argentina, Italy, Canada, Australia, Great Britain (especially if you somehow factor in Scotland), maybe Netherlands (and after this World Cup is processed they almost certainly will be)

Country between 3 and 4
Russia

Countries between 4 and 5
none

Country between 5 and 6
USA

.

Another way of looking at it is by domestic leagues. With cricket and volleyball it seems like the league infrastructure is nowhere close to the other four, so I just ignored them. My estimates for the top tiers are:

soccer - England, Germany, Spain, Italy
baseball - USA, Japan
basketball - USA, Spain
hockey - USA, Russia

Russia has the second best basketball league in Europe but no real presence in baseball (for some crazy reason) and its soccer league is second class. Unlike soccer the USA is a clear #1 in the other three, so this goes to the USA as well. The more interesting race is between Spain and Russia (again, probably not a coincidence). I think it goes to Russia (again) because the Spanish hockey league is barely alive and that gap more than makes up for the two smaller gaps in soccer and basketball, as well as the tiny gap between the Spanish baseball league and nothing. (And yes, FC Barcelona has won championships in both baseball and hockey. Suck on that, Real Madrid.)

.

#1 USA
#2 Russia
#3 Spain

Kembal
07-06-2014, 06:01 PM
The top two domestic cricket leagues are England and India.

Twenty20 and ODI cricket aren't that bad to watch. (at least, they give me something to watch while I'm in India) Test cricket makes me want to kill myself.

Dendum
07-06-2014, 07:17 PM
I know NFL football can't be used to judge the U.S.A. against other nations , as most do not participate, but I often wonder at the amount of athletic talent (a limited pool I would think) that gets funneled into that particular American past time. Many of our most talented athletes gravitate towards that sport in middle school and high school due to it's popularity, a popularity which influences future goals such as scholarship opportunities, professional salary in the sport, and ability to date cheerleaders.

Ker_Thwap
07-06-2014, 08:05 PM
I know NFL football can't be used to judge the U.S.A. against other nations , as most do not participate, but I often wonder at the amount of athletic talent (a limited pool I would think) that gets funneled into that particular American past time. Many of our most talented athletes gravitate towards that sport in middle school and high school due to it's popularity, a popularity which influences future goals such as scholarship opportunities, professional salary in the sport, and ability to date cheerleaders.

I was waiting for the cheerleader benefit, thanks for not disappointing.

Latrinsorm
07-06-2014, 09:05 PM
I know NFL football can't be used to judge the U.S.A. against other nations , as most do not participate, but I often wonder at the amount of athletic talent (a limited pool I would think) that gets funneled into that particular American past time. Many of our most talented athletes gravitate towards that sport in middle school and high school due to it's popularity, a popularity which influences future goals such as scholarship opportunities, professional salary in the sport, and ability to date cheerleaders.It's especially interesting to wonder if you think football players would make fine soccer players, as I do. Not too big (outside of linemen), high speed and quick cuts, decent stamina, practiced in interpersonal coordination. I think most would go with baseball if football vanished, though.
The top two domestic cricket leagues are England and India.That probably pushes the UK up a little, but not to the Spain/Brazil level.

Gelston
07-07-2014, 01:30 AM
The only sport that matters is war. US wins. Fin.

Oh, we also win overall in that other BS.

waywardgs
07-07-2014, 01:36 AM
The only sport that matters is war. US wins. Fin.


Sometimes.

Gelston
07-07-2014, 01:41 AM
Sometimes.

Everytime. We lose in politics.

There isn't a single nation on this planet we couldn't defeat. Including China. The occupation is a bitch.

tyrant-201
07-07-2014, 01:43 AM
We "Won" the Korean, Vietnam, and Iraq war?

Gelston
07-07-2014, 01:47 AM
We "Won" the Korean, Vietnam, and Iraq war?

We didn't lose them. Politics fucked over the first two, Iraq... Saddam is gone right? The Iraqi Army ceased to exist right? Yes we defeated Iraq. Again, occupation is a bitch.

Hell, during the Korean we were still the only nuclear armed country.

tyrant-201
07-07-2014, 01:50 AM
We didn't lose them. Politics fucked over the first two, Iraq... Saddam is gone right? The Iraqi Army ceased to exist right? Yes we defeated Iraq. Again, occupation is a bitch.

We didn't lose Korea, no. But we definitely didn't win Vietnam, and most definitely lost it. The government we supported ceased to exist when we withdrew all troops. I call that a loss. Politics are part of war.

waywardgs
07-07-2014, 01:50 AM
We didn't lose them. Politics fucked over the first two, Iraq... Saddam is gone right? The Iraqi Army ceased to exist right? Yes we defeated Iraq. Again, occupation is a bitch.

Hell, during the Korean we were still the only nuclear armed country.

Let's just say we win when we feel like it.

Gelston
07-07-2014, 01:51 AM
We didn't lose Korea, no. But we definitely didn't win Vietnam, and most definitely lost it. The government we supported ceased to exist when we withdrew all troops. I call that a loss. Politics are part of war.

We didn't lose it militarily. That is all I was saying. Drop politics, no single country on this planet can stand against us.

Gelston
07-07-2014, 01:52 AM
Let's just say we win when we feel like it.

Tell me how we lost militarily?

We have only ever lost one war militarily. Guess which.

Gelston
07-07-2014, 01:57 AM
Oh come on. It was a Congressionally declared war too.

Rallorick
07-07-2014, 02:20 AM
Rugby gets no love...

Warriorbird
07-07-2014, 06:15 AM
Hell, during the Korean we were still the only nuclear armed country.

They did test in 1949. Just depends on your terms.

Androidpk
07-07-2014, 06:23 AM
Tell me how we lost militarily?

We have only ever lost one war militarily. Guess which.

As Tyrant said you can't take politics out of war. I consider both Vietnam and Somalia a loss.

Gelston
07-07-2014, 06:56 AM
They did test in 1949. Just depends on your terms.

Deployable. They didn't have one at the time.

Gelston
07-07-2014, 06:58 AM
As Tyrant said you can't take politics out of war. I consider both Vietnam and Somalia a loss.

Again, we didn't lose militarily in Vietnam. We actually fucked them up heavily. Somalia wasn't a war, but where is the regime they had back then? Doesn't exist.

Muhammad Farrah Aidid's son was actually a US Marine.

Androidpk
07-07-2014, 07:15 AM
Which war would you consider a loss then?

Gelston
07-07-2014, 07:19 AM
Which war would you consider a loss then?

I put it out for you guys to take a guess. We have had very few actual declared wars. In high school history they probably said we won it. We really got our asses kicked.

Parkbandit
07-07-2014, 07:40 AM
I put it out for you guys to take a guess. We have had very few actual declared wars. In high school history they probably said we won it. We really got our asses kicked.

War of 1812.

Androidpk
07-07-2014, 07:54 AM
War of 1812.

Thank you for your service.

Gelston
07-07-2014, 08:52 AM
War of 1812.

Yep.

kutter
07-07-2014, 09:58 AM
Not sure you could classify 1812 as a loss, nor a win, since both sides claim to have achieved their stated goals, when in reality everyone was just tired of war and lack of trade.

Gelston
07-07-2014, 10:05 AM
Not sure you could classify 1812 as a loss, nor a win, since both sides claim to have achieved their stated goals, when in reality everyone was just tired of war and lack of trade.

I would call it a loss because we got our ass kicked at sea, barely recovered Detroit, and had out Capitol burned to the ground.

We wanted things that came back to us because the British defeated Napoleon and no longer needed to do such things. They basically had their way with us. No, we weren't conquered, but we sure as hell were on the losing end. We saved a little face with the battle of New Orleans, which occurred after the war was officially over.

Wrathbringer
07-07-2014, 11:41 AM
Thank you for your service.

Hahahahahahaha

Latrinsorm
07-07-2014, 12:56 PM
Rugby gets no love...Rugby is the closest to inclusion, if that makes you feel better! :)