PDA

View Full Version : CMANs benefiting from ensorcelled gear/anti-magic weapons



Allereli
03-26-2014, 11:41 AM
I know next to nothing about cmans in general and can use some help fleshing out the Krakiipedia articles on these CMANs (Spell Cleaving, Spell Thieve and Spell Parry) and Ensorcell.

Any info is appreciated (logs, too), but here are some specific questions:

1. Does the player gain in combat maneuver effectiveness with higher ensorcell tiers?
2. Can players use temporarily ensorcelled weapons in performing these cmans?

In the 2nd question, Krakiipedia indicates they can, but this info is only from the official description of the spell. I'd like to see a log confirming this.

MrMortimur
03-26-2014, 12:17 PM
1. From documentation, this would be a no but I don't have these cmans on any character to test and confirm. Should simply be a pre-req before it can be used.
2. Temp ensorcell would be for sorcerers only so this would also be a no. Those specific cmans are for the squares.

Buckwheet
03-26-2014, 12:21 PM
1. From documentation, this would be a no but I don't have these cmans on any character to test and confirm. Should simply be a pre-req before it can be used.
2. Temp ensorcell would be for sorcerers only so this would also be a no. Those specific cmans are for the squares.

I really thought tainted bond was impacted by the level of the ensorcell, I was bummed when I found out that was not true.

Allereli
03-26-2014, 12:25 PM
2. Temp ensorcell would be for sorcerers only so this would also be a no. Those specific cmans are for the squares.

flares for temporary ensorcell are sorcerer only

from the official documentation:


Non-sorcerers wielding temporarily ensorcelled gear may benefit while using it with certain maneuvers.

I'd really like a log confirming or denying. I'd be happy to temp ensorcell something for testing, I'll be around tonight prime time eastern.

Allereli
03-26-2014, 12:35 PM
1. From documentation, this would be a no but I don't have these cmans on any character to test and confirm. Should simply be a pre-req before it can be used.

If you don't have the cmans, how do you know for sure? I really need some concrete yeses or nos (i.e. logs)