warrior VS wizard/sorcs

[Reyek]

If Gemstone was final fantasy....

http://www.mortisland.com/FFFight.htm
Click here (http://www.mortisland.com/FFFight.htm )


:)

[KymberlynX]

:lol:

Bah. Caster Wuss.

[Fallen]

Except that now adays the square would simply hide and use the DS ambush pushdown to kill in one hit. Thank god for GS4 balance.

[Bobmuhthol]

Rogues do not represent squares. A warrior needs no DS pushdown.

P.S. Any warriors that get spells from others or hide can also be classified as rogues, as they are pussies.

[Chadj]

Rogue hide, OMG e-wave!
also, invisibility > Hiding.
Invisibility > any square type move.

[Xcalibur]

That's why war mages are the strongest, best of both worlds.:spam2:

[DeV]

Originally posted by Chadj
Invisibility > any square type move. True

[Edaarin]

Any profession can kill someone else of any other profession. It all depends on the person's training path. And anyone can be killed if caught off guard.

I'm pretty certain that there's no one whose defense my rogue can't push down to offensive, and few people that wouldn't get hit by an e-wave.

[Bobmuhthol]

<<I'm pretty certain that there's no one whose defense my rogue can't push down to offensive>>

NOT EVEN TSIN?

[Stinkfist]

Tsin ------> :bashing: <------- hiding rogue

[Parkbandit]

Originally posted by Fallen
Except that now adays the square would simply hide and use the DS ambush pushdown to kill in one hit. Thank god for GS4 balance.

Or the sorcerer would use an invisible amulet and cast implosion at the square the second he is out in the open.

Or the sorcerer would have retribution on when the square attacked, killing the square instantly.

Or the sorcerer could use any one of his many casting strength based spells and immobilize the square to kill him at his leisure.

Thank god for GS4 balance.

[DeV]

Originally posted by Parkbandit
Or the sorcerer would use an invisible amulet and cast implosion at the square the second he is out in the open.
Works like a charm. I prefer the torture method though this one definitely comes in handy.

[Bobmuhthol]

<<Or the sorcerer would have retribution on when the square attacked, killing the square instantly.>>

Archery fixes this.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

That's why implosion needs to be assraped by some GM so that it's better used in Disneyland.

[Chadj]

Yes.

[Parkbandit]

Originally posted by Bobmuhthol
<<Or the sorcerer would have retribution on when the square attacked, killing the square instantly.>>

Archery fixes this.

Is it a bug or is it a feature that when a sorcerer with retribution is attacked, the attack targets the sorcerer?

[Bobmuhthol]

The retribution didn't do anything when I sniped a sorcerer. It just gave a message saying the arrow got pwned and didn't do anything.

Tip: It does give your name, just doesn't take effect, so it's not the best if you don't want to be known.

[Parkbandit]

Ah.. good info. I thought I saw a log of you sniping someone who got nailed by his own retribution. (Which I think would be a great idea.. but I'm a sick one)