PDA

View Full Version : Why the lights went out



edge
08-19-2003, 10:51 PM
POWER OUTAGE TRACED TO DIM BULB IN WHITE HOUSE



THE TALE OF THE BRITS WHO SWIPED 800 JOBS FROM NEW YORK, CARTED OFF $90
MILLION, THEN TONIGHT, TURNED OFF OUR LIGHTS



by Greg Palast



I can tell you all about the ne're-do-wells that put out our lights tonight.
I came up against these characters -- the Niagara Mohawk Power Company --
some years back. You see, before I was a journalist, I worked for a living,
as an investigator of corporate racketeers. In the 1980s, "NiMo" built a
nuclear plant, Nine Mile Point, a brutally costly piece of hot junk for
which NiMo and its partner companies charged billions to New York State's
electricity ratepayers.



To pull off this grand theft by kilowatt, the NiMo-led consortium fabricated
cost and schedule reports, then performed a Harry Potter job on the account
books. In 1988, I showed a jury a memo from an executive from one partner,
Long Island Lighting, giving a lesson to a NiMo honcho on how to lie to
government regulators. The jury ordered LILCO to pay $4.3 billion and,
ultimately, put them out of business.



And that's why, if you're in the Northeast, you're reading this by
candlelight tonight. Here's what happened. After LILCO was hammered by the
law, after government regulators slammed Niagara Mohawk and dozens of other
book-cooking, document-doctoring utility companies all over America with
fines and penalties totaling in the tens of billions of dollars, the
industry leaders got together to swear never to break the regulations again.
Their plan was not to follow the rules, but to ELIMINATE the rules. They
called it "deregulation."



It was like a committee of bank robbers figuring out how to make
safecracking legal.

But they dare not launch the scheme in the USA. Rather, in 1990, one devious
little bunch of operators out of Texas, Houston Natural Gas, operating under
the alias "Enron," talked an over-the-edge free-market fanatic, Britain's
Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, into licensing the first completely
deregulated power plant in the hemisphere.



And so began an economic disease called "regulatory reform" that spread
faster than SARS. Notably, Enron rewarded Thatcher's Energy Minister, one
Lord Wakeham, with a bushel of dollar bills for 'consulting' services and a
seat on Enron's board of directors. The English experiment proved the
viability of Enron's new industrial formula: that the enthusiasm of
politicians for deregulation was in direct proportion to the payola provided
by power companies.



The power elite first moved on England because they knew Americans wouldn't
swallow the deregulation snake oil easily. The USA had gotten used to cheap
power available at the flick of switch. This was the legacy of Franklin
Roosevelt who, in 1933, caged the man he thought to be the last of the power
pirates, Samuel Insull. Wall Street wheeler-dealer Insull creator of the
Power Trust, and six decades before Ken Lay, faked account books and ripped
off consumers. To frustrate Insull and his ilk, FDR gave us the Federal
Power Commission and the Public Utilities Holding Company Act which told
electricity companies where to stand and salute. Detailed regulations
limited charges to real expenditures plus a government-set profit. The laws
banned "power markets" and required companies to keep the lights on under
threat of arrest -- no blackout blackmail to hike rates.



Of particular significance as I write here in the dark, regulators told
utilities exactly how much they had to spend to insure the system stayed in
repair and the lights stayed on. Bureaucrats crawled along the wire and,
like me, crawled through the account books, to make sure the power execs
spent customers' money on parts and labor. If they didn't, we'd whack'm over
the head with our thick rule books. Did we get in the way of these
businessmen's entrepreneurial spirit? Damn right we did.



Most important, FDR banned political contributions from utility companies --
no 'soft' money, no 'hard' money, no money PERIOD.



But then came George the First. In 1992, just prior to his departure from
the White House, President Bush Senior gave the power industry one long
deep-through-the-teeth kiss good-bye: federal deregulation of electricity.
It was a legacy he wanted to leave for his son, the gratitude of power
companies which ponied up $16 million for the Republican campaign of 2000,
seven times the sum they gave Democrats.



But Poppy Bush's gift of deregulating of wholesale prices set by the feds
only got the power pirates halfway to the plunder of Joe Ratepayer. For the
big payday they needed deregulation at the state level. There were only two
states, California and Texas, big enough and Republican enough to put the
electricity market con into operation.



California fell first. The power companies spent $39 million to defeat a
1998 referendum pushed by Ralph Nadar which would have blocked the de-reg
scam. Another $37 million was spent on lobbying and lubricating the campaign
coffers of legislators to write a lie into law: in the deregulation act's
preamble, the Legislature promised that deregulation would reduce
electricity bills by 20%. In fact, when San Diegans in the first California
city to go "lawless" looked at their bills, the 20% savings became a 300%
jump in surcharges.



Enron circled California and licked its lips. As the number one life-time
contributor to the George W. Bush campaign, it was confident about the
future. With just a half dozen other companies it controlled at times 100%
of the available power capacity needed to keep the Golden State lit. Their
motto, "your money or your lights." Enron and its comrades played the system
like a broken ATM machine, yanking out the bills. For example, in the
shamelessly fixed "auctions" for electricity held by the state, Enron bid,
in one instance, to supply 500 megawatts of electricity over a 15 megawatt
line. That's like pouring a gallon of gasoline into a thimble -- the lines
would burn up if they attempted it. Faced with blackout because of Enron's
destructive bid, the state was willing to pay anything to keep the lights
on.



And the state did. According to Dr. Anjali Sheffrin, economist with the
California state Independent System Operator which directed power movements,
between May and November 2000, three power giants physically or
"economically" withheld power from the state and concocted enough false bids
to cost the California customers over $6.2 billion in excess charges.



It took until December 20, 2000, with the lights going out on the Golden
Gate, for President Bill Clinton, once a deregulation booster, to find his
lost Democratic soul and impose price caps in California and ban Enron from
the market.



But the light-bulb buccaneers didn't have to wait long to put their hooks
back into the treasure chest. Within seventy-two hours of moving into the
White House, while he was still sweeping out the inaugural champagne
bottles, George Bush the Second reversed Clinton's executive order and put
the power pirates back in business in California. Enron, Reliant (aka
Houston Industries), TXU (aka Texas Utilities) and the others who had
economically snipped California's wires knew they could count on Dubya, who
as governor of the Lone Star state cut them the richest deregulation deal in
America.



Meanwhile, the deregulation bug made it to New York where Republican
Governor George Pataki and his industry-picked utility commissioners ripped
the lid off electric bills and relieved my old friends at Niagara Mohawk of
the expensive obligation to properly fund the maintenance of the grid
system.



And the Pataki-Bush Axis of Weasels permitted something that must have
former New York governor Roosevelt spinning in his wheelchair in Heaven:
They allowed a foreign company, the notoriously incompetent National Grid of
England, to buy up NiMo, get rid of 800 workers and pocket most of their
wages - producing a bonus for NiMo stockholders approaching $90 million.



Is tonight's black-out a surprise? Heck, no, not to us in the field who've
watched Bush's buddies flick the switches across the globe. In Brazil,
Houston Industries seized ownership of Rio de Janeiro's electric company.
The Texans (aided by their French partners) fired workers, raised prices,
cut maintenance expenditures and, CLICK! the juice went out so often the
locals now call it, "Rio Dark."



So too the free-market cowboys of Niagara Mohawk raised prices, slashed
staff, cut maintenance and CLICK! -- New York joins Brazil in the Dark Ages.



Californians have found the solution to the deregulation disaster: re-call
the only governor in the nation with the cojones to stand up to the
electricity price fixers. And unlike Arnold Schwarzenegger, Gov. Gray Davis
stood alone against the bad guys without using a body double. Davis called
Reliant Corp of Houston a pack of "pirates" --and now he'll walk the plank
for daring to stand up to the Texas marauders.



So where's the President? Just before he landed on the deck of the Abe
Lincoln, the White House was so concerned about our brave troops facing the
foe that they used the cover of war for a new push in Congress for yet more
electricity deregulation. This has a certain logic: there's no sense
defeating Iraq if a hostile regime remains in California.



Sitting in the dark, as my laptop battery runs low, I don't know if the
truth about deregulation will ever see the light --until we change the dim
bulb in the White House.

Bestatte
08-20-2003, 07:38 AM
Nice opinion piece. But I'd like to know the source. I'm sure the source would be pleased that you obeyed the law and cited the source too, since they own this piece of fluff journalism. Reprinting without permission is illegal, afterall.

So - what website did you get this from?

AnticorRifling
08-20-2003, 08:52 AM
He sited the writer at the very beginning

Bestatte
08-20-2003, 08:59 AM
That's just a by-line. In most cases, articles in newpapers or internet news sites are owned by the site and protected by that site's copyright.

I'm asking for the source. Where he got that article from in the first place. Not who wrote it.

Artha
08-20-2003, 09:23 AM
I'm betting Yellow Times...but only because they're stupid, and commies.

Parkbandit
08-20-2003, 09:32 AM
Originally posted by Bestatte
Nice opinion piece. But I'd like to know the source. I'm sure the source would be pleased that you obeyed the law and cited the source too, since they own this piece of fluff journalism. Reprinting without permission is illegal, afterall.

So - what website did you get this from?

I doubt anyone would come to the Gemstone Players Corner looking for plagerism or copy right infrigement... especially since he didn't claim to write it.

Bestatte
08-20-2003, 09:53 AM
I'm sure they wouldn't bother looking here for infringement, Parkbandit. That's not why I'm asking (even though it is a valid reason to ask).

I'm asking because I wanted to look at the source, to see what other articles might be there, to find out the political "bent" that source has, to see if it's a website of conspiracy theories, or random articles by random people who just like writing their opinions down for other people to read..

Or if it's actually a valid news source, like AP or Reuters whatever.

Basically, I was looking to see if it came from a "Weekly World News/National Enquirer" type of source, or from something that people actually take seriously.

Bestatte
08-20-2003, 10:09 AM
Well a google search found this guy for me, and his article. It appeared on ZNet. Palast is a writer who has won awards in Britain for exposing various coverups in the States.

I skimmed over his official website, which is filled with vitriolic and venom about pretty much every possible political topic you can think of - and a few you would never care to think of.

It seems to me, that he just pokes daggers at everything and once in awhile comes up with paydirt. You know how it goes - dig up a few thousand haystacks, and you'll eventually find a needle. Palast is the guy who looks for needles, and if he finds a tiny piece of metal, he'll insist that it is not only a needle, but THE needle..and write column upon column about it until it becomes a book that is sold on Amazon.com for $14.00 US.

Pretty clever I think - but certainly not what I'd consider a hard news writer. He's a conspiracy theorist who turns up the occasional actual conspiracy. Nothing anyone can't do if they know how to type and read the National Enquirer and hobnob with the president's secretary's housekeeper's babysitter.