droit
07-23-2012, 03:55 PM
Ran some numbers with UAC and the advantages of held brawling weapons. Using some pretty average numbers (give or take), I found that using one brawling weapon gives a nice boost over attacking empty handed, but holding two weapons gives essentially no bonus over holding one. The bolded numbers are the final damage, all other things being equal.
PLATE
punch v plate, empty hands
UAF: 200 vs UDF: 150 = 1.33 * MM: 100 + d100: 50 = 183
83 * .140 = 11.62
punch v plate, 4x cestus
UAF: 210 vs UDF: 150 = 1.4 * MM: 95 + d100: 50 = 183
83 * .165 = 13.7
punch v plate, 4x knuckleblade
UAF: 210 vs UDF: 150 = 1.4 * MM: 90 + d100: 50 = 176
76 * .190 = 14.44
punch v plate, 4x tiger claw
UAF: 210 vs UDF: 150 = 1.4 * MM: 85 + d100: 50 = 169
69 * .215 = 14.84
punch v plate, 4x cestus x2
UAF: 210 vs UDF: 150 = 1.4 * MM: 90 + d100: 50 = 176
76 * .190 = 14.44
punch v plate, 4x knuckleblade x2
UAF: 210 vs UDF: 150 = 1.4 * MM: 80 + d100: 50 = 162
62 * .240 = 14.88
punch v plate, 4x tiger claw x2
UAF: 210 vs UDF: 150 = 1.4 * MM: 70 + d100: 50 = 148
48 * .290 = 13.92
SCALE
punch v scale, empty hands
UAF: 200 vs UDF: 150 = 1.33 * MM: 100 + d100: 50 = 183
83 * .200 = 16.6
punch v scale, 4x cestus
UAF: 210 vs UDF: 150 = 1.4 * MM: 95 + d100: 50 = 183
83 * .225 = 18.68
punch v scale, 4x cestus x2
UAF: 210 vs UDF: 150 = 1.4 * MM: 90 + d100: 50 = 176
76 * .250 = 19
punch v scale, 4x knuckleblade
UAF: 210 vs UDF: 150 = 1.4 * MM: 90 + d100: 50 = 176
76 * .250 = 19
punch v scale, 4x knuckleblade x2
UAF: 210 vs UDF: 150 = 1.4 * MM: 80 + d100: 50 = 162
62 * .300 = 18.6
punch v scale, 4x tiger claw
UAF: 210 vs UDF: 150 = 1.4 * MM: 85 + d100: 50 = 169
69 * .275 = 18.98
punch v scale, 4x tiger claw x2
UAF: 210 vs UDF: 150 = 1.4 * MM: 70 + d100: 50 =
48 * .350 = 16.8
Just some back-of-the-envelope calculations. It would be neat if someone mathematically minded found an optimal combination, since you can use different weights of brawling weapons together. My gut instinct right now is to go for the single knuckleblade-weight brawler.
PLATE
punch v plate, empty hands
UAF: 200 vs UDF: 150 = 1.33 * MM: 100 + d100: 50 = 183
83 * .140 = 11.62
punch v plate, 4x cestus
UAF: 210 vs UDF: 150 = 1.4 * MM: 95 + d100: 50 = 183
83 * .165 = 13.7
punch v plate, 4x knuckleblade
UAF: 210 vs UDF: 150 = 1.4 * MM: 90 + d100: 50 = 176
76 * .190 = 14.44
punch v plate, 4x tiger claw
UAF: 210 vs UDF: 150 = 1.4 * MM: 85 + d100: 50 = 169
69 * .215 = 14.84
punch v plate, 4x cestus x2
UAF: 210 vs UDF: 150 = 1.4 * MM: 90 + d100: 50 = 176
76 * .190 = 14.44
punch v plate, 4x knuckleblade x2
UAF: 210 vs UDF: 150 = 1.4 * MM: 80 + d100: 50 = 162
62 * .240 = 14.88
punch v plate, 4x tiger claw x2
UAF: 210 vs UDF: 150 = 1.4 * MM: 70 + d100: 50 = 148
48 * .290 = 13.92
SCALE
punch v scale, empty hands
UAF: 200 vs UDF: 150 = 1.33 * MM: 100 + d100: 50 = 183
83 * .200 = 16.6
punch v scale, 4x cestus
UAF: 210 vs UDF: 150 = 1.4 * MM: 95 + d100: 50 = 183
83 * .225 = 18.68
punch v scale, 4x cestus x2
UAF: 210 vs UDF: 150 = 1.4 * MM: 90 + d100: 50 = 176
76 * .250 = 19
punch v scale, 4x knuckleblade
UAF: 210 vs UDF: 150 = 1.4 * MM: 90 + d100: 50 = 176
76 * .250 = 19
punch v scale, 4x knuckleblade x2
UAF: 210 vs UDF: 150 = 1.4 * MM: 80 + d100: 50 = 162
62 * .300 = 18.6
punch v scale, 4x tiger claw
UAF: 210 vs UDF: 150 = 1.4 * MM: 85 + d100: 50 = 169
69 * .275 = 18.98
punch v scale, 4x tiger claw x2
UAF: 210 vs UDF: 150 = 1.4 * MM: 70 + d100: 50 =
48 * .350 = 16.8
Just some back-of-the-envelope calculations. It would be neat if someone mathematically minded found an optimal combination, since you can use different weights of brawling weapons together. My gut instinct right now is to go for the single knuckleblade-weight brawler.