View Full Version : Priorities poll
Artha
04-09-2004, 08:50 PM
The results of the poll on profession development caused us to question some other issues related to priorities. Please help us understand your desires for GemStone IV, and take the three priorities polls now added to the poll page.
https://www.play.net/gs4/poll/home.asp
Thank you for your assistance.
Melissa
Kitsun
04-09-2004, 09:25 PM
There wasn't a darn option for layered clothing inventory and keeping inventory straight or fiddling with inventory ordering.
I wanted Savants, Spell lists(1-20) done and a new high end hunting area.
I wanted fixed/completed spells, new 60-80 hunting grounds, and unarmed combat. Not necessarily in that order.
Artha
04-09-2004, 09:34 PM
I voted for Savants and Monks (I don't really care about paladins, savants need the most work done), and a 21-40 hunting ground (I want to hunt something that isn't a krolvin warfarer).
Snapp
04-09-2004, 09:38 PM
I voted complete missing spells 1-20, guild skills for guilds under 6 skills, and complete missing spells 21-50... I want a "All of the above before 2010" option.
Mistomeer
04-09-2004, 11:21 PM
I wanted a "I thought half this shit was supposed to be done already" option. That's what pisses me off, to this day. They have promised half of those things for years, and yet they take the time to fuck up skinning, release CHE bullshit, etc. and can't finish any of the things we actually want.
theotherjohn
04-10-2004, 12:03 AM
I voted for breakage
TheEschaton
04-10-2004, 12:56 AM
I voted for "non-combat related methods of experience gain".
I'd like to finally retire and open up shop somewhere.
-TheE-
I didn't bother to take the survey because no matter what we won't see a third of what is promised before i get my doctorate.
Galleazzo
04-10-2004, 01:05 AM
Good that they asked, though.
Thats like saying, "Good that she gave me a number, but too bad it was to blimpie subs."
MPSorc
04-10-2004, 01:18 AM
so many things that i have not understood why they were done, or why they were done before something meaningful was done i cannot even think on what to vote for
Fengus
04-10-2004, 03:49 PM
I put fill in the missing spell slots from 1-20, and breakage, and breakage. I think I can remove a vote and re-vote inwhich case I will vote for breakage again.
Although judging the number of things to vote for the results will be that none of those things gets more than 5% so they will do nothing as before.
Varsus
04-10-2004, 04:02 PM
MORE PREMI STUFF!
-Varsus
Nakiro
04-10-2004, 05:54 PM
non-comabt hunting methods
completion/enhancing spell slots 1 - 20
undead (hopefully in higher ranges)
I agree, this shit should be done before 2010, but it won't get anywhere.
Bobmuhthol
04-10-2004, 05:56 PM
Ability bonus items
Player-run shops
Cobbling improvements
The options in the poll suck.
Kitsun
04-10-2004, 06:21 PM
Originally posted by Nakiro
non-comabt hunting methods
LOL
Non-combat hunting eh?
Is that like non-tranquil pacifism?
Miss X
04-10-2004, 06:58 PM
I voted for hunting areas lvl 60-80
spell lists from 20-50
savants
MPSorc
04-10-2004, 07:13 PM
how bout the option.....quit thinking up new stupid shit for like a year, take those developers and GM's dedicated to thinking up new and stupid shit, and have them get to work with those few who actually try and make shit work and work on what you have been promising for 10 years.
Suppa Hobbit Mage
04-10-2004, 07:13 PM
I voted for 60-80 hunting, spell lists 20-50 and fix/tweak existing spells
Kitsun
04-11-2004, 01:04 AM
Bah everyone that is voting for the 60-80 range isn't thinking far enough ahead. By the time it comes out, you'll have wished you voted for 80-100. But you have time to be forgiven! Go and recast your vote today!
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.