PDA

View Full Version : New LichNet and Repository online



SpiffyJr
11-24-2009, 09:35 PM
There is a new LichNet server online that Tillmen and I have access to. This should eliminate the disconnects that are happening and should provide a means for those who notice issues to contact someone who can take care of them in a reasonable timeframe. All you have to do is change the server to lichproject.com in lnet, repo, updater, and infomon to use the new server.

The repository is lacking any of the scripts that were on the old repository so it will be the responsibility of the script author to upload it to the new repository. Let me know if you experience any issues.

Flessen
11-24-2009, 10:17 PM
[lnet: error in listener_thread: Invalid argument]
[lnet: error in listener_thread: Invalid argument]
[lnet: error in listener_thread: Invalid argument]
[lnet: error in listener_thread: Invalid argument]
[lnet: error in listener_thread: Invalid argument]
[lnet: error in listener_thread: Invalid argument]
[lnet: error in listener_thread: Invalid argument]
[lnet: error in listener_thread: Invalid argument]
[lnet: error in listener_thread: Invalid argument]
[lnet: error in listener_thread: Invalid argument]
[lnet: error in listener_thread: Invalid argument]
[lnet: error in listener_thread: Invalid argument]
[lnet: error in listener_thread: Invalid argument]
[lnet: error in listener_thread: Invalid argument]
[lnet: error in listener_thread: Invalid argument]
[lnet: error in listener_thread: Invalid argument]
[lnet: error in listener_thread: Invalid argument]
[lnet: error in listener_thread: Invalid argument]
[lnet: error in listener_thread: Invalid argument]
[lnet: error in listener_thread: Invalid argument]


made changes and tried to ;who this is what I got

pabstblueribbon
11-24-2009, 10:21 PM
You're doing it wrong.

I changed mine and connect just fine.

spraggeth
11-24-2009, 10:29 PM
he's not doing it wrong. noldo just looked at mine and everything is correct and it is doing it to me as well.

funny thing is i was the second one on and talking to noldo then all of a sudden it happened. no idea what's going on.

pabstblueribbon
11-24-2009, 10:33 PM
That is odd... im the only one connected!


Aiiieee!!1

Or im the only one doing it right! Muhah!

SpiffyJr
11-24-2009, 10:35 PM
It doesn't help my connect is going in and out so troubleshooting is nigh impossible.

pabstblueribbon
11-24-2009, 10:43 PM
Still connected..

>;who
Cylla says, "Back in a tick."
>

Currently linked to LichNet:
Baerden

Total: 1

Server has been up and running for 0 days.

I R TEH WINNAR!

pabstblueribbon
11-24-2009, 11:04 PM
It stayed connected for a good while. Then I lost connection. It would then reconnect and I would get this error while supposedly connected:

>;who
[lnet: error in listener_thread: Invalid argument]
[lnet: (eval):365:in `gets']
>

FWIW

SpiffyJr
11-24-2009, 11:16 PM
It... might... be... working.

Athgo
11-24-2009, 11:35 PM
Any idea what this is:
[lnet: keepalive error: An established connection was aborted by the software in your host machine.]

SpiffyJr
11-24-2009, 11:37 PM
Did you change all the files?

Alorn15
11-26-2009, 02:40 AM
Looking good!

Feature requests for the repository:
1. Categories (including a 'deprecated' category)
2. A GUI that would resemble a package manager. In my mind it would list all the scripts you have on the left and all the scripts on the repository on the right. Downloading would occur via drag and drop or double click of items on the right. Should include optional preview of first 5-10 lines of the script, and/or a script information field editable by the author. With the right functionality, it wouldn't just be a GUI for managing downloads but a GUI for keeping track of scripts already living on your machine.

Edited for more:
1. Optional changelog/version number parameters added to ;repos upload
2. Are scripts time-stamped at upload? The top of the manager list should be populated by *Updated* scripts, E.G. the version on the repository is newer than the one you have locally. (IMO This flag should appear based on time-stamps as opposed to version numbers, as the latter is not often indicated by the author.)